The scope of user-generated content: User-contributions within online journalism

Journalists, Sources, and Credibility: New Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 167-181

  Bergström, Annika ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906006050     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203835708     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Bergström, Annika (2005) “nyhetsvanor.nu: Nyhetsanvändning på internet 1998 till 2003” [News consumption practices on the Internet 1998 to 2003], Paper prepared for the Department of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Gothenburg.
2. Bergström, Annika (2008) “The reluctant audience: Online participation in the Swedish journalistic context,” Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture 5(2): pp. 60–80.
3. Chisholm, Jim (2004) “Question of news value driving papers,” Newspapers & Technology, February.
4. Chung, Deborah, S. (2007) “Profi ts and perils: Online news producers’ perceptions of interactivity and uses of interactive features,” Convergence 13(1): pp. 43–61.
5. Chung, Deborah (2008) “Interactive features of online newspapers: Identifying patterns and predicting use of engaged readers,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13: pp. 658–679.
6. Chung Deborah, S. and Chan Yun Yoo (2008) “Audience motivations for using interactive features: Distinguishing use of different types of interactivity on an online newspaper,” Mass Communication and Society 11(4): pp. 375–397.
7. Clark, Wayne (2002) Activism in the Public Sphere: Exploring the discourse of political participation, Aldershot: Ashgate.
8. Croteau, David (2006) “The growth of self-produced media content and the challenge to media studies,” In Critical Studies in Media Communication 23(4): pp. 340–344.
9. Davis, Richard (2005) Politics Online: Blogs, chatrooms and discussion groups in American democracy, New York/London: Routledge.
10. Domingo, David (2008) “Interactivity in the daily routines of online newsrooms: Dealing with an uncomfortable myth,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(3): pp. 680–704.
11. Gillmore, Dan (2004) We the Media. Grassroots Journalism by the People for the People. Sebastopol-Farnham: O’Reilly.
12. Hallin, Dan and Mancini, Paolo (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Hedman, Ulrika (2009) Läsarmedverkan: Lönande logiskt lockbete [User-contributions as part of the company strategy], Gothenburg: Department of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Gothenburg.
14. Hujanen, Jaana and Pietikäninen, Sari (2004) “Interactive uses of journalism: crossing between technological potential and young people’s news using practices,” New Media & Society 6(3): pp. 383–401.
15. Karlsson, Michael (2006) “Nätjournalistik: En explorative fallstudie av digitala mediers karaktärsdrag på fyra svenska tidningssajter,” [Net Journalism: An explorative case study of character of news sites], Lund Studies in Media and Communication 9. pp. 1–239.
16. Lasica Joseph, D. “The promise of the daily me,” Online Journalism Review. Available: httm://www.ojr.org/ojr/lasica/1017779142.php.
17. Limonard, Sander (2007) “Business Requirements and Potential Bottlenecks for Successful New Citizen Media Applications,” Report prepared for the Sixth Framework Programme: Citizen Media Project.
18. Madden, Mary and Fox, Susannah (2006) “Riding the Waves of ‘Web 2.0’,” Pew Internet Project. Available: www.pewinternet.org. Accessed July 9, 2010.
19. Matheson, Donald (2004) “Weblogs and the epistemology of the news: Some trends in online journalism,” New Media & Society 6(4): pp. 443–468.
20. McMillan, Sally J. (2002) “A four-part model of cyber-interactivity: Some cyberplaces are more interactive than others,” New Media & Society 4(2): pp. 271–291.
21. Neuberger, Christoph (2007) “Weblogs und Journalismus: Konkurrenz, Ergänzung oder Integration?,” Medieperspektiven 2. Available: charlottabaltazar. fi les.wordpress.com/…/bloggen-en-asiktsmaskin-av-c-baltazar2.pdf.
22. Nielsen, Jakob (2006) “Participation inequality: Encouraging more users to contribute,” Jacob Nielsen’s Alertbox. Available: www.useit.com/alertbox/participation_ inequality.html.
23. Nilsson, Åsa (2009) “Den nationella SOM-undersökningen 2008 [The national SOM-survey 2008],” in Sören Holmberg and Lennart Weibull (Eds) Svensk Höst [Swedish Fall], Report no. 41, Gothenburg: The SOM-Institute, University of Gothenburg.
24. Nip Joyce, M. (2006) “Exploring the second phase of journalism charlottabaltazar. files.wordpress.com/…/bloggen-en-asiktsmaskin-av-c-baltazar2.pdf, Journalism Studies7(2): pp. 212–236.
25. OECD (2007) “Participative Net and User-Created Content. Web 2.0, Wikis and Social Networking.” Available: http://www.oecd.org/document/40/0,3343, en_ 2649_34223_39428648_1_1_1_1,00.html. Accessed July 10, 2010.
26. Örnebring, Henrik (2008) “The consumer as producer—of what? User-generated tabloid content in The Sun (UK) and Aftonbladet (Sweden),” Journalism Studies 9(5): pp. 771–785.
27. Paulussen, Steve, Heinonen, Ari, Domingo, David, and Quandt Thorsten (2007) “Doing it together: Citizen participation in the professional news making process,” Observatorio Journal 3: pp. 131–154.
28. Rafaeli, Sheizaf and Sudweeks, Fay (1997) “Networked interactivity”’ Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2(4). Available at: http://jcmc.indiana. edu/vol2/issue4/rafaeli.sudweeks.html. (accessed June 2008).
29. Roscoe, Timothy (1999) “The construction of the World Wide Web audience,” Media, Culture and Society 21. vol. 5, pp. 673–684.
30. Singer, Jane (2006) “Stepping back from the gate: Online newspaper editors and the co-production of content in ‘Campaign 2004’,” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 83(2): pp. 265–280.
31. Strid, Jan (2008) “Morgonpressens innehåll—vad är läst och vad är viktigt 2007?” [The content in morning papers—what is read and what is important in 2007?], in Sören Holmberg and Lennart Weibull (Eds) Skilda världar: Trettioåtta kapitel om politik, medier och samhälle [Separate worlds], Report no. 44, Gothenburg: The SOM-Institute, University of Gothenburg.
32. Stromer-Galley, Jennifer (2000) “On-line interaction and why candidates avoid it,” Journal of Communication 50(4): pp. 111–132.
33. Thurman, Neil (2008) “Forum for citizen journalists? Adoption of user generated content initiatives by online news media,” New Media & Society 10. vol. 1, pp. 139–157.
34. Tancer, Bill (2007) “Measuring Web 2.0 Consumer Participation.” Available www. hitwise.com/down-loads/reports/Hitwise_US_Measuring_Web_2.0_Consumer_ Participation_June_2007.pdf.
35. Weibull, Lennart and Jönsson, Anna Maria (2007) “The Swedish Media Landscape,” in Georgiao Terzis (Ed) European Media Governance: National and Regional Dimensions, Bristol: Intellect Books, The Mill. Avialable: www.som.gu.se/.