Optimization of multilocus sequence analysis for identification of species in the genus Vibrio

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 80, Issue 17, 2014, Pages 5359-5365

  Gabriel, Michael W ^a   Matsui, George Y ^a   Friedman, Robert ^a   Lovell, Charles R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOINFORMATICS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; RNA;

16S RRNA GENE SEQUENCE; GENE COMBINATIONS; MAXIMUM PARSIMONY; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; MULTILOCUS SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS; PHYLOGENETIC TREES; TREE CONSTRUCTION;

GENES;

BIOASSAY; GENE EXPRESSION; OPTIMIZATION; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENETICS;

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; RNA 16S;

CLASSIFICATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; EVALUATION STUDY; GENETICS; MULTILOCUS SEQUENCE TYPING; PHYLOGENY; PROCEDURES; VIBRIO;

BACTERIAL PROTEINS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; MULTILOCUS SEQUENCE TYPING; PHYLOGENY; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; VIBRIO;

EID: 84905920849     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01206-14     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Klein SL, Guitierrez West CK, Mejia DM, Lovell CR. 2014. Genes similar to the Vibrio parahaemolyticus virulence-related genes tdh, tlh, and vscC2 occur in other Vibrionaceae species isolated from a pristine estuary. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80:595-602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02895-13.
2. Sawabe T, Kita-Tsukamoto K, Thompson FL. 2007. Inferring the evolutionary history of vibrios by means of multilocus sequence analysis. J. Bacteriol. 189:7932-7936. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.00693-07.
3. Sawabe T, Ogura Y, Matsumura Y, Feng G, Amin AKMR, Mino S, Nakagawa S, Sawabe T, Kumar R, Fukui Y, Santomi M, Matsushima R, Thompson FL, Gomez-Gil B, Christian R, Maruyama F, Kurokawa K, Hayashi T. 2013. Updating the Vibrio clades defined by multilocus sequence phylogeny: proposal of eight new clades, and the novel description of Vibrio tritonius sp. nov. Front. Microbiol. 4:414. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2013.00414.
4. Brown MM, Friez MJ, Lovell CR. 2003. Expression of nifH genes by diazotrophic bacteria in the rhizosphere of short form Spartina alterniflora. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 43:411-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2003.tb01081.x.
5. Criminger JD, Hazen TH, Sobecky PA, Lovell CR. 2007. Nitrogen fixation by Vibrio parahaemolyticus and its implications for a new ecological niche. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:5959-5961. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00981-07.
6. Urdaci MC, Stal LJ, Marchand M. 1988. Occurrence of nitrogen fixation among Vibrio spp. Arch. Microbiol. 150:224-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00407784.
7. Miyashiro T, Ruby EG. 2012. Shedding light on bioluminescence regulation in Vibrio fischeri. Mol. Microbiol. 84:795-806. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08065.x.
8. Ruby EG. 1996. Lessons from a cooperative, bacterial-animal association: the Vibrio fischeri-Euprymna scolopes light organ symbiosis. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 50:591-624. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.50.1.591.
9. Stabb EV. 2006. The Vibrio fischeri-Euprymna scolopes light organ symbiosis, p 204-218. In Thompson FL, Austin B, Swings J (ed), The biology of vibrios. ASM Press, Washington DC.
10. Gómez-León J, Villamil L, Lemos ML, Novoa B, Figueras A. 2005. Isolation of Vibrio alginolyticus and Vibrio splendidus from aquacultured carpet shell clam (Ruditapes decussatus) larvae associated with mass mortalities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:98-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.1.98-104.2005.
11. Sugumar G, Nakai T, Hirata Y, Matsubara D, Muroga K. 1998. Vibrio splendidus biovar II as the causative agent in bacillary necrosis of Japanese oyster Crassostrea gigas larvae. Dis. Aquat. Org. 33:111-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/dao033111.
12. Luna-González A, Maeda-Martinez AN, Sainz JC, Ascencio-Valle F. 2002. Comparative susceptibility of veliger larvae of four bivalve mollusks to a Vibrio alginolyticus strain. Dis. Aquat. Org. 49:221-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/dao049221.
13. Amaro C, Biosca EG. 1996. Vibrio vulnificus biotype 2, pathogenic for eels, is also an opportunistic pathogen for humans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:1454-1457.
14. Tison DL, Nishibuchi M, Greenwood JD, Seidler RJ. 1982. Vibrio vulnificus biogroup 2: new biogroup pathogenic for eels. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 44:640-646.
15. Jones MK, Oliver JD. 2009. Vibrio vulnificus: disease and pathogenesis. Infect. Immun. 77:1723-1733. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01046-08.
16. Toranzo AE, Magariños B, Romalde JL. 2005. A review of the main bacterial fish diseases in mariculture systems. Aquaculture 246:37-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.01.002.
17. Schiewe MH, Trust TJ, Crosa JH. 1981. Vibrio ordalii sp. nov.: a causative agent of vibriosis in fish. Curr. Microbiol. 6:343-348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01567009.
18. Soto-Rodriguez SA, Gomez-Gil B, Lozano R. 2010. 'Bright-red' syndrome in Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei is caused by Vibrio harveyi. Dis. Aquat. Org. 92:11-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/dao02274.
19. Haldar S, Chatterjee S, Sugimoto N, Das S, Chowdhury N, Hinenoyu A, Asakura M, Yamasaki S. 2011. Identification of Vibrio campbellii isolated from diseased farm-shrimp from south India and establishment of its pathogenic potential in an Artemia model. Microbiology 157:179-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.041475-0.
20. Colwell RR, Brayton PR, Grimes DJ, Roszak DB, Huq SA, Palmer LM. 1985. Viable but non-culturable Vibrio cholerae and related pathogens in the environment: implications for release of genetically engineered microorganisms. Nat. Biotechnol. 3:817-820. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt0985-817.
21. Cottingham KL, Chiavelli DA, Taylor RK. 2003. Environmental microbe and human pathogen: the ecology and microbiology of Vibrio cholerae. Front. Ecol. Environ. 1:80-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/1540 -9295(2003)001[0080:EMAHPT]2.0.CO;2.
22. Dziejman M, Balon E, Boyd D, Fraser CM, Heidelberg JF, Mekalanos JJ. 2002. Comparative genomic analysis of Vibrio cholerae: genes that correlate with cholera endemic and pandemic disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:1556-1561. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.042667999.
23. Daniels NA, MacKinnon L, Bishop R, Altekruse S, Ray B, Hammond RM, Thompson S, Wilson S, Bean NH, Griffin PM, Slutsker L. 2000. Vibrio parahaemolyticus infections in the United States, 1973-1998. J. Infect. Dis. 181:1661-1666. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/315459.
24. Velazquez-Roman J, León-Sicairos N, Flores-Villaseñor H, Villafaña-Rauda S, Canizalez-Roman A. 2012. Association of pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6 present in the coastal environment of northwest Mexico with cases of recurrent diarrhea between 2004 and 2010. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78:1794-1803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.06953-11.
25. Strom MS, Paranjpye RN. 2000. Epidemiology and pathogenesis of Vibrio vulnificus. Microbes Infect. 2:177-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1286-4579(00)00270-7.
26. Brayton PR, Bode RB, Colwell RR, MacDonell MT, Hall HL, Grimes DJ, West PA, Bryant TN. 1986. Vibrio cincinnatiensis sp. nov., a new human pathogen. J. Clin. Microbiol. 23:104-108.
27. Igbinosa EO, Okoh AL. 2010. Vibrio fluvialis: an unusual enteric pathogen of increasing public health concern. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 7:3628-3643. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7103628.
28. Chakraborty R, Chakraborty S, De K, Sinha S, Mukhopadhyay AK, Khanam J, Ramamurthy T, Takeda Y, Bhattacharya SK, Nair GB. 2005. Cytotoxic and cell vacuolating activity of Vibrio fluvialis isolated from paediatric patients with diarrhoea. J. Med. Microbiol. 54:707-716. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.45820-0.
29. Chowdhury G, Pazhani GP, Dutta D, Guin S, Dutta S, Ghosh S, Izumiya H, Asakura M, Yamasaki S, Takeda Y, Arakawa E, Wantanabe H, Mukhpadhyay AK, Bhattacharya MK, Rajendran K, Nair GB, Ramamurthy T. 2012. Vibrio fluvialis in patients with diarrhea, Kolkata, India. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 18:1868 -1871. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1811.120520.
30. Brenner DJ, Hickman-Brenner FW, Lee JV, Steigerwalt AG, Fanning GR, Hollis DG, Farmer JJ, III, Weaver RE, Joseph SW, Seidler RJ. 1983. Vibrio furnissii (formerly aerogenic biogroup of Vibrio fluvialis), a new species isolated from human feces and the environment. J. Clin. Microbiol. 18:816-824.
31. Linde H-J, Kobuch R, Jayasinghe S, Reischal V, Lehn N, Kaulfuss S, Beutin L. 2004. Vibrio metschnikovii, a rare cause of wound infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:4909-4911. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.42.10.4909-4911.2004.
32. Dalsgaard A, Alarcon A, Lanata CF, Jensen T, Hansen HJ, Delgado F, Gil AI, Penny ME, Taylor D. 1996. Clinical manifestations and molecular epidemiology of five cases of diarrhoea in children associated with Vibrio metschnikovii in Arequipa, Peru. J. Med. Microbiol. 45:494-500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00222615-45-6-494.
33. Wallet F, Tachon M, Nseir S, Courcol RJ, Roussel-Delvallez M. 2005. Vibrio metschnikovii pneumonia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 11:1641-1642. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1110.050177.
34. Vieira VV, Teixeira LFM, Vicente ACP, Momen H, Salles CA. 2001. Differentiation of environmental and clinical isolates of Vibrio mimicus from Vibrio cholerae by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:2360-2364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.5.2360 -2364.2001.
35. Campos E, Bolaños H, Acuña MT, Diaz G, Matamoros MC, Raventós H, Sánchez LM, Sánchez O, Barquero C. 1996. Vibrio mimicus diarrhea following ingestion of raw turtle eggs. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:1141- 1144.
36. Chitov T, Kirikaew P, Yungyune P, Ruengprapan N, Sontikun K. 2009. An incidence of large foodborne outbreak associated with Vibrio mimicus. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 28:421-424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-008-0639-7.
37. Dorsch M, Lane D, Stackebrandt E. 1992. Towards a phylogeny of the Genus Vibrio based on 16S rRNA sequences. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 42:58-63.
38. AL, p 494-546. In Brenner DJ, Kreig NR, Staley JT, Garrity GM (ed), Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology, 2nd ed, vol 2part B. Springer, New York, NY.
39. Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM. 1994. Taxonomic note: a place for DNADNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 44:846-849.
40. Ruimy R, Breittmayer V, Elbaze P, Lafay B, Boussemart O, Gauthier M, Christen R. 1994. Phylogenetic analysis and assessment of the genera Vibrio, Photobacterium, Aeromonas, and Plesiomonas deduced from smallsubunit rRNA sequences. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 44:416-426.
41. Thompson CC, Thompson FL, Vandemeulebroecke K, Hoste B, Dawyndt P, Swings J. 2004. Use of recA as an alternative phylogenetic marker in the family Vibrionaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 54:919-924. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02963-0.
42. Thompson FL, Gomez-Gil B, Vasconcelos ATR, Sawabe T. 2007. Multilocus sequence analysis reveals that Vibrio harveyi and V. campbellii are distinct species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:4279-4285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00020-07.
43. Thompson FL, Gevers D, Thompson CC, Dawyndt P, Naser S, Hoste B, Munn CB, Swings J. 2005. Phylogeny and molecular identification of vibrios on the basis of multilocus sequence analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:5107-5115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.9.5107-5115.2005.
44. Martens M, Dawyndt P, Coopman R, Gillis M, De Vos P, Willems A. 2008. Advantages of multilocus sequence analysis for taxonomic studies: a case study using 10 housekeeping genes in the genus Ensifer (includingformer Sinorhizobium). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 58:200-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.65392-0.
45. Nishiguchi MK, Nair VS. 2003. Evolution of symbiosis in the Vibrionaceae: a combined approach using molecules and physiology. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 53:2019-2026. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02792-0.
46. Tracz DM, Backhouse PG, Olson AB, McCrea JK, Walsh JA, Ng LK, Gilmour MW. 2007. Rapid detection of Vibrio species using liquid microsphere arrays and real-time PCR targeting the ftsZ locus. J. Med. Microbiol. 56:56-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.46759-0.
47. Le Roux F, Gay M, Lambert C, Nicolas JL, Gouy M, Berthe F. 2004. Phylogenetic study and identification of Vibrio splendidus-related strains based on gyrB gene sequences. Dis. Aquat. Org. 58:143-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/dao058143.
48. Gevers D, Vandepoele K, Simillion C, Van de Peer Y. 2004. Gene duplication and biased functional retention of paralogs in bacterial genomes. Trends Micriobiol. 12:148-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2004.02.007.
49. Pascual J, Macián MC, Arahal DR, Garay E, Pujalte MJ. 2010. Multilocus sequence analysis of the central clade of the genus Vibrio by using 16S rRNA, recA, pyrH, rpoD, gyrB, rctB and toxR genes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 60:154-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.010702-0.
50. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28:2731-2739. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr121.
51. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2408678.
52. Alfaro ME, Zoller S, Lutzoni F. 2003. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20:255-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msg028.
53. Hedges SB. 1992. The number of replications needed for accurate estimation of the bootstrap P value in phylogenetic studies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9:366-369.
54. IBM Corp. 2012. IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, version 21.0. IBM Corp, Armonk, NY.
55. Stewart CB. 1993. The powers and pitfalls of parsimony. Nature 361:603- 607. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/361603a0.