Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers' understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States: Second Edition

Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics: Teachers' Understanding of Fundamental Mathematics in China and the United States: Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-169

  Ma, Liping ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905768667     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203856345     Document Type: Book

References (98)

1. Armstrong, B., & Bezuk, N. (1995). Multiplication and division of fractions: The search for meaning. In J.Sowder & B.Schappelle (Eds.), Providing a foundation for teaching mathematics in the, middle grades (pp. 85-119). Albany: State University of New York Press.
2. Ball, D. (1988a). Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, Massachusetts Summermath for teachers program and educational leaders in mathematics project. In National Center for Research on Teacher Education, Dialogues in teacher education (pp. 79-88). East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Education.
3. Ball, D. (1988b). Knowledge and reasoning in mathematical pedagogy: Examining what prospective, teachers bring to teacher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
4. Ball, D. (1988c). The subject matter preparation of prospective teachers: Challenging the, myths. East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Education.
5. Ball, D. (1989). Teaching mathematics for understanding: What do teachers need to know about the subject matter. East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Education.
6. Ball, D. (1990). Prospective elementary and secondary teachers' understanding of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(2), 132-144.
7. Ball, D. (1991). Research on teaching mathematics: Making subject matter knowledge part of the equation. In J.Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 1-48). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
8. Ball, D. (1992). Magical hopes: Manipulatives and the reform of math education. American Educator, 16(1), 14-18, 46-47.
9. Ball, D. (1993a). Halves, pieces, and twoths: Constructing and using representational contexts in teaching fractions. In T.Carpenter, E.Fennema, & T.Romberg (Eds.), Rational numbers: An integration of research (pp. 157-195). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Ball, D. (1993b). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 373-397.
11. Ball, D. (1996). Connecting to mathematics as a part of teaching to learn. In D.Schifter (Ed.), What's happening in math class?: Reconstructing professional identities (Vol. 2, pp. 36-45). New York: Teachers College Press.
12. Ball, D., & Cohen, D. (1996). Reform by the book: What is-or what might be-the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6-8, 14.
13. Ball, D., & Feiman-Nemser, S. (1988). Using textbooks and teachers' guides: A dilemma for beginning teachers and teacher educators. Curriculum Inquiry, 18, 401-423.
14. Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, and Zhejiang Associate Group for Elementary Mathematics Teaching Material Composing (1989). Shuxue, Diwuce [Mathematics Vol. 5]. Beijing, China: Beijing Publishing House.
15. Bruner, J. (1960/1977). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. California State Department of Education. (1985). Mathematics framework for California public schools. Sacramento, CA: California State Department of Education.
17. California State Department of Education. (1992). Mathematics framework for California public schools. Sacramento, CA: California State Department of Education.
18. Chang, L., & Ruzicka, J. (1986). Second international mathematics study, United States, Technical report I. Champaign, IL: Stipes.
19. Cipra, B. (Ed.). (1992). On the mathematical preparation of elementary school teachers. Report of a two-part conference held at the University of Chicago in January and May, 1991.
20. Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., & McNeal, B. (1992). Characteristics of classroom mathematics traditions: An interactional analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 573-604.
21. Cohen, D.K. (1991). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 311-330.
22. Coleman, J.S. (1975). Methods and results in IEA studies of effects of school on learning. Review of Educational Research, 45(3), 355-386.
23. Crosswhite, F.J. (1986). Second international mathematics study: Detailed report for the United States. Champaign, IL: Stipes.
24. Crosswhite, F.J., Dossey, J., Swafford, J., McKnight, C., & Cooney, T. (1985). Second international mathematics study. Summary report for the United States. Champaign, IL: Stipes.
25. Dewey, J. (1902/1975). The child and the curriculum. In M.Dworkin (Ed.), Dewey on education: Selections (pp. 91-111). New York: Teachers College Press.
26. Dowker, A. (1992). Computational strategies of professional mathematicians. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(1), 45-55.
27. Driscoll, M.J. (1981). Research within reach: Elementary school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
28. Duckworth, E. (1979, June). Learning with breadth and depth. Presented as the Catherine Molony Memorial Lecture, City College School of Education, Workshop Center for Open Education, NewYork.
29. Duckworth, E. (1987). Some depths and perplexities of elementary arithmetic. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 6, 43-94.
30. Duckworth, E. (1991). Twenty-four, forty-two, and I love you: Keep it complex. Harvard Educational Review, 61, 1-24.
31. Ferrini-Mundy, J., & Johnson, L. (1994). Recognizing and recording reform in mathematics: New questions, many answers. Mathematics Teacher, 87(3), 190-193.
32. Ferrucci, B. (1997). Institutionalizing mathematics education reform: Vision, leadership, and the Standards. In J.Ferrini-Mundy & T.Schram (Eds.), The Recognizing and Recording Reform in Mathematics Education Project: Insights, issues, and implications (pp. 35-47). Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph No. 8.
33. Freeman, D.J., & Porter, A.C. (1989). Do textbooks dictate the content of mathematics instruction in elementary schools? American Educational Rasearch Journal, 26(3), 403-421.
34. Fuson, K.C., Smith, S.T., & Lo Cicero, A.M. (1997). Supporting Latino first graders' ten-structured thinking in urban classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(6), 738-766.
35. Geary, D., Siegler, R., & Fan, L. (1993). Even before formal instruction, Chinese children outperform American children in mental addition. Cognitive Development, 8(4), 517-529.
36. Greer, B. (1992). Multiplication and division as models of situations. In D.Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 276-295). New York: Macmillan.
37. Grossman, P., Wilson, S., & Shulman, L. (1989). Teachers of substance: Subject matter knowledge for teaching. In M.Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher (pp. 23-36). New York: Pergamon Press.
38. Heaton, R. (1992). Who is minding the mathematics content?: A case study of a fifth grade teacher. Elementary School Journal, 93(2), 153-162.
39. Hiebert, J. (1984). Children's mathematics learning: The struggle to link form and understanding. Elementary School Journal, 84, 497-513.
40. Hirsch, E.D., Jr. (1996). The schools we need and why we don't have them. New York: Doubleday.
41. Husen, T. (1967a). International study of achievement in mathematics (Vol. 1). New York: Wiley.
42. Husen, T. (1967b). International study of achievement in mathematics (Vol. 2). New York: Wiley.
43. Kaput, J. (1994). Democratizing access to calculus: New routes to old roots. In A.Schoenfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking and problem solving (pp. 77-156). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
44. Kaput, J., & Nemirovsky, R. (1995). Moving to the next level: A mathematics of change theme throughout the K-16 curriculum. UME Trends, 6(6), 20-21.
45. Kieran, C. (1990). Cognitive processes involved in learning school algebra. In P.Nesher & J.Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics and cognition: A research synthesis by the, International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics education (pp. 96-112). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
46. Kroll, L., & Black, A. (1993). Developmental theory and teaching methods: A pilot study of a teacher education program. Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 417-441.
47. Lange, L. (1964). The structure of mathematics. In G.Ford & L.Pugno (Eds.), The structure of knowledge and the curriculum (pp. 50-70). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
48. LaPointe, A.E., Mead, N.A., & Philips, G.W. (1989). A world of differences: An international assessment of mathematics and science. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
49. Lee, S.Y., Ichikawa, V., & Stevenson, H.W. (1987). Beliefs and achievement in mathematics and reading: A cross-national study of Chinese, Japanese, and American children and their mothers. In D.Kleiber & M.Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation (Vol. 7, pp. 149-179). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
50. Leinhardt, G. (1987). Development of an expert explanation: An analysis of a sequence of subtraction lessons. Cognition and Instruction, 4(4), 225-282.
51. Leinhardt, G., & Greeno, J. (1986). The cognitive skill of mathematics teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 75-95.
52. Leinhardt, G., Putnam, R., Stein, M., & Baxter, J. (1991). Where subject matter knowledge matters. In J.Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 87-113). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
53. Leinhardt, G., & Smith, D. (1985). Expertise in mathematics instruction: Subject matter knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 247-271.
54. Lindquist, M. (1997). NAEP findings regarding the preparation and classroom practices of mathematics teachers. In P.Kenney & E.Silver (Eds.), Results from the sixth mathematics assessment of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (pp. 61-86). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
55. Lynn, R. (1988). Educational achievement in Japan: Lessons for the West. NY: Sharpe.
56. Magidson, S. (1994, April). Expanding horizons: From a researcher's (development of her own instruction to the implementation of that material by others. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
57. Marks, R. (1987). Those, who appreciate: A case study of Joe, a beginning mathematics teacher (Knowledge Growth in a Profession Publication Series). Stanford, CA: Stanford University, School of Education.
58. McKnight, C., Crosswhite, F., Dossey, J., Kifer, E., Swafford, J., Travers, K., & Cooney, T. (1987). The under-achieving curriculum: Assessing U.S. schools from an international perspective. Champaign, IL: Stipes.
59. Miura, I., & Okamoto, Y. (1989). Comparisons of American and Japanese first graders' cognitive representation of number and understanding of place value. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 109-113.
60. National Center for Education Statistics. (1997). Pursuing excellence: A study of U.S. fourth-grade mathematics and science achievement in international context (NCES 97-255). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
61. National Center for Research on Teacher Education. (1988). Dialogues in teacher education. East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Education.
62. National Center for Research on Teacher Education. (1991). Findings from the teacher education and learning to teach study: Final report. East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Education.
63. National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. New York: Author.
64. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation: Standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
65. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
66. Paine, L., & Ma, L. (1993). Teachers working together: A dialogue on organizational and cultural perspectives of Chinese teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 19(8), 675-718.
67. Pólya, G. (1973). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press (2nd printing).
68. Putnam, R. (1992). Teaching the "hows" of mathematics for everyday life: A case study of a fifthgrade teacher. The Elementary School Journal, 93(2), 163-177.
69. Putnam, R., Heaton, R., Prawat, R., & Remillard, J. (1992). Teaching mathematics for understanding: Discussing case studies of four fifth-grade teachers. Elementary School Journal, 93(2), 213-228.
70. Resnick, L.B. (1982). Syntax and semantics in learning to subtract. In T.Carpenter, P.Moser, & T.Romberg (Eds.), Addition and subtraction: A cognitive, perspective, (pp. 136-155). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
71. Robitaille, D.F., & Garden, R.A. (1989). The IEA study of mathematics II: Contexts and outcomes of school mathematics. New York: Pergamon.
72. Schifter, D. (1996a). Conclusion: Throwing open the doors. In D.Schifter (Ed.), What's happening in math class?: Reconstructing professional identities (Vol. 2, pp. 163-165). New York: Teachers College Press.
73. Schifter, D. (1996b). Introduction: Reconstructing professional identities. In D.Schifter (Ed.), What's happening in math class?: Reconstructing professional identities (Vol. 2, pp. 1-8). New York: Teachers College Press.
74. Schifter, D. (Ed.). (1996c). What's happening in math class?: Envisioning new practices through teacher narratives (Vol. 1). New York: Teachers College Press.
75. Schifter, D. (Ed.). (1996d). What's happening in math class?: Reconstructing professional identities (Vol. 2). New York: Teachers College Press.
76. Schmidt, W. (Ed.). (1996). Characterizing pedagogical flow: An investigation of mathematics and science teaching in six countries. Boston: Kluwer.
77. Schmidt, W., McKnight, C., & Raizen, S. (1997). A splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education. Boston: Kluwer.
78. Schoenfeld, A. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
79. Schram, P., Nemser, S., & Ball, D. (1989). Thinking about teaching subtraction with regrouping: A comparison of beginning and experienced teachers' responses to textbooks. East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Education.
80. Shen, B., & Liang, J. (1992). Xiao xue shu xue jiao xue fa [Teaching elementary mathematics-A teacher's manual]. Shanghai, Beijing: The Press of East China Normal University.
81. Shimahara, N., & Sakai, A. (1995). Learning to teach in two cultures: Japan and the United States. New York: Garland Publishing.
82. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.
83. Simon, M. (1993). Prospective elementary teachers' knowledge of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(3), 233-254.
84. Smith, D., & Mikami, Y. (1914). A history of Japanese mathematics. Chicago: Open Court Publishing Company.
85. Sosniak, L., & Stodolsky, S. (1993). Teachers and textbooks: Materials use in four fourth-grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 93(3), 2549-275.
86. Steen, L. (1990). Pattern. In L.Steen (Ed.), On the shoulders of giants (pp. 1-10). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
87. Stein, M., Baxter, J., & Leinhardt, G. (1990). Subject matter knowledge and elementary instruction: A case from functions and graphing. American Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 639-663.
88. Steinberg, R., Marks, R., & Haymore, J. (1985). Teachers' knowledge and structure content in mathematics (Knowledge Growth in a Profession Publication Series). Stanford, CA: Stanford University, School of Education.
89. Stevenson, H.W., Azuma, H., & Hakuta, K. (Eds.). (1986). Child development and education in Japan. New York: W.H.Freeman.
90. Stevenson, H.W., Lee, S., Chen, C., Lummis, M., Stigler, J., Fan, L., & Ge, E. (1990). Mathematics achievement of children in China and the United States. Child Development, 61, 1053-1066.
91. Stevenson, H.W., & Stigler, J.W. (1992). The learning gap. New York: Summit Books.
92. Stigler, J.W., Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (1996). Cultures of mathematics instruction in Japanese and American elementary classrooms. In T.Rohlen & G.LeTendre (Eds.), Teaching and learning in Japan (pp. 213-247). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
93. Stigler, J.W., Lee, S.Y., & Stevenson, H.W. (1986). Mathematics classrooms in Japan, Taiwan, and the United States. Child Development, 58(5), 1272-1285.
94. Stigler, J.W., & Perry, M. (1988a). Cross-cultural studies of mathematics teaching and learning: Recent findings and new direction. In D.Grouws & T.Cooney (Eds.), Perspectives on research on effective mathematics teaching (Vol. 1). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
95. Stigler, J.W., & Perry, M. (1988b). Mathematics learning in Japanese, Chinese, and American classrooms. New directions for child development, 41, 27-54.
96. Stigler, J.W., & Stevenson, H.W. (1991). How Asian teachers polish each lesson to perfection. American Educator, 14(4), 13-20, 43-46.
97. Walker, D. (1990). Fundamentals of curriculum. Santiago, Chile: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
98. Wilson, S. (1988). Understanding historical understanding: Subject matter knowledge and the, teaching of U.S. history. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.