Targeting neighborhoods, stimulating markets: The role of political, institutional, and technical factors in three cities

The City After Abandonment

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 104-132

  Thomson, Dale E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEARBORN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905764517     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. for the variations of and rationale for strategic geographic targeting, see dale e. thomson, "strategic, geographic targeting of housing and community development resources", urban affairs review 43, 5(2008):629-62.
2. Paul C. Brophy and Kim Burnett, "Building a New Framework for Community Development in Weak Market Cities", paper prepared for Community Development Partnership Network, 2003, http://www.community-wealth.org/-pdfs/articles-publications/cdcs/paper-brophy-burnettpdf.
3. Ingrid Gould Ellen, Michael H. Schill, Scott Susin, and Amy Ellen Schwartz, "Building H omes, Reviving Neighborhoods", Journal of H ousing R esearch 12, 2(2002):185-216;
4. Ingrid G. Ellen and Ioan Voicu, "Nonprofit Housing and Neighborhood Spillovers", Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 25, 1(2006):31-52;
5. George Galster, Peter Tatian, and John Accordino, "Targeting Investments in Neighborhood Revitalization", Journal of the American Planning Association 72, 4(2006):457-74;
6. George Galster et al., "Measuringthe Impact of Community Development Block Grant Spending on Urban Neighborhoods", Housing Policy Debate 15, 4(2004):903-31.
7. See William C. Baer, "On the Death of Cities", Public Interest 45(Fall 1976):3-19;
8. Anthony Downs, "Using the Lessons of Experience to Allocate Resources in the Community D evelopment Program", in Recommendations for Community Development Planning (Chicago: Real Estate Research Corporation, 1976), 1-28;
9. Nancy Kleniewski, "Triage and Urban Planning", International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 10, 4(1986):563-79.
10. Robert K. Yin, Case Study Research (Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage, 1994), 13.
11. David Boehlke, "Great Neighborhoods, Great City", paper prepared for Goldseker Foundation, Baltimore, 2004, htp://wwwgoldsekerfoundation. og/GNGC.pdf.
12. Brophy and Burnett, "Building a New Framework", 15.
13. H ealthy Neighborhoods, I nc, "H ealthy N eighborhoods NSP 2 Appl ication (Application Identification: 308558434)", Baltimore, 2009, http://www.healthyneighborhoodsorg/tuyandrenovate/NSP2-ApplicationFinalpdf.
14. Fore xample, see Tony Proscio, From I mprovement to Recovery, report for Cleveland and George Gund Foundations, Cleveland, 2003.
15. Village Capital Corporation, Investing in City Life (Cleveland: Village Capital, 2007).
16. City of Cleveland Department of C ommunity Development, "Year 36 Community D evelopment Bio ck Gr ant C DC C ompetitive Gr ant P rogram Appl ication", 2010, http://www.city.cleveland.oh.us/clnd-images/PDF/CD/BlockGrantApp.pdf.
17. Cuyahoga County Land Reutilization Corporation, Neighborhood Stabilization P rogram A ction P Ian, re port for the U. S. D epartment of H ousing and U rban Development, 2010, http://hudnsphelp. info/media/GAReports/A-B-09-CN-OH-0032.pdf.
18. Local Initiatives Support Corporation, "Detroit LISC Announces Plans for Its Largest Effort in Detroit-The $40M 'Neighborhoods Now' Campaign", news release, February 15, 2005, htp://wwwprnewswirecom/rewsreleases/Atroitlisc-announces-plans-for-its-largest-effort-in-detroit-the-40m-neighborhoods-now-campaign-54072292html.
19. Local Initiatives Support Corporation, 2008 Annual Report to the Community, Detroit, 2009.
20. For an account of NDNI's experience, see Dale E. Thomson, "Strategic Geographic Targeting in Community Development", Urban Affairs Review 47, 4(2011):564-94
21. John R. P. French and Bertram Raven, "The Bases of Social Power", in Studies in Social Power, ed. Dorwin Cartwright (Ann Arbor, Mich.: Institute for Social Research, 1959), 150-67.
22. Paul Hersey, Kenneth H. Blanchard, and Walter E. Natemeyer, "Situational Leadership, Perception, and the Impact of P ower", Group and Or gm isa ion d Studies 4, 4(1979):418-28.
23. Thomson, "Strategic Geographic Targeting in Community Development"
24. Thirty-four percent of CDBG and HOME dollars, less allocations for administration, nonprofit homeless services, and AIDS prevention services. City of Cleveland Department o f C ommunity De velopment, Community P lanning and D evelopment Programs Proposed 2010-2011 Action Plan for Public Review and Comment, report for U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, March 11, 2010.
25. Mayor's Council on City Living, The Mayor's Council on City Living Report, Baltimore, 2003, Http://fillcreekconsultants.com/documents/Ealtimore%HMayors%20Council%2) on%2DCity%2) Living.pdf.
26. Thomson, "Strategic Geographic Targeting in Community Development"
27. Percentages reflect total targeted funding reported earlier in the chapter divided by total annual HUD CDBG and HOME appropriations, http://www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/communitydevelopment/budget/. Targeted funds also came from other sources, including general obligation bonds, used for activities other than community development. Targeted funds as as hare of tot al funding from a 11 these prog rams would beam uch lo wer p ercentage. H owever, C DBG and H OME funds prov ide a more reasonable approximation of community development expenditures in a given year.