Group decision making with the analytic hierarchy process in benefit-risk assessment: A tutorial

Patient

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 129-140

  Hummel, J Marjan ^a   Bridges, John F P ^a,b   IJzerman, Maarten J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GOAL ATTAINMENT; GROUP DECISION MAKING; GROUP PRACTICE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; GOALS; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS;

EID: 84905757508     PISSN: 11781653     EISSN: 11781661     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40271-014-0050-7     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Diaby V, Campbell K, Goeree R. Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) in health care: a bibliometric analysis. Oper Res Health Care. 2013;2:20-4.
2. Liberatore MJ, Nydick RL. The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: a literature review. EJOR. 2008;189(1):294-307.
3. Dyer RF, Forman EH. Group decision support with the analytic hierarchy process. Decis Support Syst. 1992;8:99-124.
4. Dolan JG, Boohaker E, Allison J, Imperiale TF. Patients' preferences and priorities regarding colorectal cancer screening. Med Decis Making. 2013;33(1):59-70.
5. Kitamura Y. Decision-making process of patients with gynecological cancer regarding their cancer treatment choices using the analytic hierarchy process. Japan J Nurs Sci. 2010;7(2):148-57.
6. Singh S, Dolan JG, et al. Optimal management of adults with pharyngitis: a multi-criteria decision analysis. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006;6:14.
7. Van Til JA, Renzenbrink GJ, Dolan JG, IJzerman MJ. The use of the analytic hierarchy process to aid decision making in acquired equinovarus deformity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(3):457-62. (Pubitemid 351273175)
8. Hilgerink MP, Hummel JM, Manohar S, et al. Assessment of the added value of the Twente Photoacoustic Mammoscope in breast cancer diagnosis. Med Devices (Auckl). 2011;4:107-15.
9. Kim K, Kyung T, Kim W, et al. Efficient management design for swimming exercise treatment. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2009;13(6):497-502.
10. Li XJ, Bin GF, Dhillon BS. Model to evaluate the state of mechanical equipment based on health value. Mech Mach Theory. 2011;46(3):305-11.
11. Baykasoglu A, Dereli T, et al. Application of cost/benefit analysis for surgical gown and drape selection: a case study. Am J Infect Control. 2009;37(3):215-26.
12. Hummel JM, Volz F, van Manen JG, Danner M, et al. Using the analytic hierarchy process to elicit patient preferences: prioritizing multiple outcome measures of antidepressant drug treatment. Patient. 2012;5(4):225-37.
13. Kim W, Han SK, Oh KJ, et al. The dual analytic hierarchy process to prioritize emerging technologies. Technol Forecast Social Change. 2010;77(4):566-77.
14. Smith J, Cook A, Packer C. Evaluation criteria to assess the value of identification sources for horizon scanning. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010;26(3):348-53.
15. Saaty TL. The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1980.
16. Saaty TL. Highlights and critical points in the theory and application of the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res. 1994;74:426-47.
17. DeSanctis G, Gallupe RB. A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Manag Sci. 1987;33:589-609. (Pubitemid 17586367)
18. Hummel JM, van Rossum W, Verkerke GJ, Rakhorst G. Product design planning with the analytic hierarchy process in interorganizational networks. R&D Manag. 2002;32(5):451-8.
19. Murphy CK. Limits of the analytical hierarchy process from its consistency index. Eur J Oper Res. 1993;65:138-9.
20. Holder RD. Some comments on the analytic hierarchy process. J Opl Res Soc. 1990;41(11):1073-6.
21. Saaty TL. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci. 2008;1(8):83-98.
22. Lootsma FA. Conflict resolution via pairwise comparison of concessions. Eur J Opl Res. 1989;40(1):109-16.
23. Beynon M. An analysis of distributions of priority values from alternative comparison scales within AHP. Eur J Oper Res. 2002;140(1):104-17. (Pubitemid 34249689)
24. Salo AA, Hämäläinen RP. On the measurement of preference in the analytic hierarchy process. J Multi Crit Decis Anal. 1997;6(6):309-19. (Pubitemid 127146248)
25. Ishizaka A, Balkenborg D, Kaplan T. Influence of aggregation and measurement scale on ranking a compromise alternative in AHP. J Oper Res Soc. 2011;62(4):700-10.
26. Saaty TL. Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/network processes. Eur J Oper Res. 2006;168:557-70. (Pubitemid 41329864)
27. Steele K, Carmel Y, Cross J, Wilcox C. Uses and misuses of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) in environmental decision making. Risk Anal. 2009;29(1):26-33.
28. Forman E, Peniwati K. Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res. 1998;108:165-9. (Pubitemid 128372596)
29. Ishizaka A, Labib A. Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Syst Appl. 2011;38(11):14336-45.
30. Millet I, Saaty TL. On the relativity of relative measures: accommodating both rank preservation and rank reversals in the AHP. Eur J Oper Res. 2000;121(1):205-12. (Pubitemid 30546356)
31. Forman EH, Gass SI. The analytic hierarchy process: an exposition. Oper Res. 2001;49(4):469-86.
32. Lootsma FA. Scale sensitivity in a multiplicative variant of the AHP and SMART. J Multi Crit Decis Anal. 1993;2:87-110.
33. Stam A, Duarte Silva AP. On multiplicative priority rating methods for the AHP. Eur J Oper Res. 2003;145(1):92-108.
34. Mareschal B. Weight stability intervals in multicriteria decision aid. Eur J Oper Res. 1988;33:54-64. (Pubitemid 18546735)
35. Triantaphyllou E, Sanchez A. A sensitivity analysis approach for some deterministic multi-criteria decision making methods. Decis Sci. 1997;28:151-94. (Pubitemid 127070910)
36. Hummel JM, Van Rossum W, Verkerke GJ, Rakhorst G. The effects of Team Expert Choice on group-decision making in collaborative new product development, a pilot study. J Multi Crit Decis Anal. 2000;9(1-3):90-8.
37. Kahraman C, Cebeci U, Ulukan Z. Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logist Inf Manag. 2003;16(6):382-94.
38. Saaty TL, Vargas LG. Decision making with the analytic network process: economic, political, social and technological applications with benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. New York: Springer Science and Business Media; 2006.
39. Thokala P, Duenas A. Multiple criteria decision analysis for health technology assessment. Value Health. 2012;15:1172-81.
40. Valerie Belton V, Theodor J, Stewart TJ. Multiple criteria decision analysis an integrated approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002.
41. Keeney RL, Raiffa H. Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993.
42. Lootsma FA, Schuijt H. The multiplicative AHP, SMART and ELECTRE in a common context. J Multi Crit Decis Anal. 1997;6:185-96. (Pubitemid 127095826)
43. Edwards W, Barton FH. Smarts and smarter: improved simple methods for multi attribute utility measurement. Organ Behav Human Decis Process. 1994;60:306-25.
44. von Winterfeldt D, Edwards W. Decision analysis and behavioral research. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1986.
45. Bana e Costa CA, Chagas MP. A career choice problem: an example of how to use MACBETH to build a quantitative value model based on qualitative value judgments. Eur J Oper Res. 2004;153(2):323-31.