Breast tomosynthesis: A replacement or an adjunct to conventional diagnostic mammography?

Current Breast Cancer Reports

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 132-137

  Geisel, Jaime L ^a   Philpotts, Liane E ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer screening; Digital breast tomosynthesis; Mammography; Synthesizedmammography

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONVENTIONAL DIAGNOSTIC MAMMOGRAPHY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RADIATION EXPOSURE; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STEREOTACTIC BIOPSY;

EID: 84905729975     PISSN: 19434588     EISSN: 19434596     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12609-014-0146-z     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R, Eben EB, Ekseth U, Haakenaasen U, et al. Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. Radiology. 2013;267(1):47-56.
2. Ciatto S, Houssami N, Bernardi D, Caumo F, Pellegrini M, Brunelli S, et al. "Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study." Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(7):583-589.
3. Rafferty EA, Park JM, Philpotts LE, Poplack SP, Sumkin JH, Halpern EF, et al. Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multi-reader trial. Radiology. 2013;266:104-13.
4. Rose SL, Tidwell AL, Bujnoch LJ, Kushwaha AC, Nordmann AS, Sexton Jr R. Implementation of Breast Tomosynthesis in a Routine Screening Practice: An Observational Study. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(6):1401-8.
5. Haas BM, Kaira V, Geisel J, Raghu M, Durand M, Philpotts LE. Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening. Radiology. 2013;269:694-700.
6. Butler R, Hui A, Chen C, Durand M, Philpotts L. Effect of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening on Diagnostic Work-up Patterns.Radiological Society of North America 2012 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting; November 25-November 30, 2012 Chicago IL. rsna2012.rsna.org/search/event-display.cfm?em-id=12026179 Accessed February 7, 2014.
7. Hakim CM, Chough DM, Ganott MA, Sumkin JH, Zuley ML, Gur D. Digital breast tomosynthesis in the diagnostic environment: a subjective side-by-side review. Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195(2):W172-6.
8. Brandt KR, Craig DA, Hoskins TL, Henrichsen TL, Bendel EC, Brandt SR, et al. Can Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Replace Conventional Diagnostic Mammography Views for Screening Recalls Without Calcifications? A Comparison Study in a Simulated Clinical Setting. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(2):291-8.
9. Noroozian M, Hadjiiski L, Rahnama-Moghadam S, Klein KA, Jeffries DO, Pinsky RW, et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis is comparable to mammographic spot views for mass characterization. Radiology. 2012;262(1):61-8.
10. Zuley ML, Bandos AI, Ganott MA, Sumkin JH, Kelly AE, Catullo VJ, et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus supplemental diagnostic mammographic views for evaluation of noncalcified breast lesions. Radiology. 2013;266(1):89-95.
11. Spangler LM, Zuley ML, Sumkin JH, Abrams G, Ganott MA, Hakim C, et al. Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(2):320-4.
12. Dang PA, Freer PE, Humphrey KL, Halpern EF, Rafferty EA. Addition of Tomosynthesis to Conventional Digital Mammography: Effect on Image Interpretation Time of Screening Examinations. Radiology. 2014;270(1):49-56.
13. Zuley ML, Bandos AI, Abrams GS, Cohen C, Hakim CM, Sumkin JH, et al. Time to diagnosis and performance levels during repeat interpretations of digital breast tomosynthesis: preliminary observations. Acad Radiol. 2010;17(4):450-5.
14. Gur D, Abrams GS, Chough DM, Ganott MA, Hakim CM, Perrin RL, et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(2):586-91.
15. Good WF, Abrams GS, Catullo VJ, Chough DM, Ganott MA, Hakim CM, et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: a pilot observer study. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190(4):865-9. (Pubitemid 351571506)
16. Bernardi D, Ciatto S, Pellegrini M, Anesi V, Burlon S, Cauli E, et al. Application of breast tomosynthesis in screening: incremental effect on mammography acquisition and reading time. Br J Radiol. 2012;85(1020):e1174-8.
17. Kalra V, Haas B, Butler R, Geisel J, Hooley R, Andrejeva L, et al. Time for Tomosynthesis: Screening Combined Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs. Full-Field Digital Mammography Interpretation Time in Clinical Practice: A Prospective Study of 300 Cases.Radiological Society of North America 2012 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting; November 25- November 30, 2012 Chicago IL. rsna2012.rsna.org/search/event-display.cfm?em-id=12029139 Accessed February 10, 2014.
18. Zuley ML, et al. " Comparison of Two-dimensional Synthesized Mammograms versus Original Digital Mammograms Alone and in Combination with Tomosynthesis Images." Radiology. 2014. doi:10.1148/radiol.13131530
19. Skaane P, Bandos AI, Eben EB, Jebsen IN, Krager M, Haakenaasen U, et al. "Two-View Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening with Synthetically Reconstructed Projection Images: Comparison with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Full-Field Digital Mammographic Images." Radiology. 2014. doi:10.1148/radiol.13131391
20. Viala J, Gignier P, Perret B, Hovasse C, Hovasse D, Chancelier-Galan M-D, et al. Stereotactic Vacuum-Assisted Biopsies on a Digital Breast 3D-Tomosynthesis System. Breast J. 2013;19(1):4-9.
21. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh-docs/pdf12/k122836.pdf