Translation Memory retrieval methods

14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2014, EACL 2014

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 202-210

  Bloodgood, Michael ^a   Strauss, Benjamin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

AMAZON'S MECHANICAL TURKS; COMMERCIAL SYSTEMS; EDIT DISTANCE; HUMAN JUDGMENTS; LANGUAGE PAIRS; MATCHING ALGORITHM; MULTIPLE DOMAINS; TRANSLATION MEMORY;

TRANSLATION (LANGUAGES);

EID: 84905680169     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/v1/e14-1022     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Peter J Arthern. 1978. Machine translation and computerized terminology systems: A translator's viewpoint. In Translating and the Computer: Proceedings of a Seminar, pages 77-108.
2. Timothy Baldwin and Hozumi Tanaka. 2000. The effects of word order and segmentation on translation retrieval performance. In Proceedings of the 18th conference on Computational linguistics-Volume 1, pages 35-41. Association for Computational Linguistics.
3. Michael Bloodgood and Chris Callison-Burch. 2010a. Bucking the trend: Large-scale cost-focused active learning for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 854-864. Association for Computational Linguistics.
4. Michael Bloodgood and Chris Callison-Burch. 2010b. Using mechanical turk to build machine translation evaluation sets. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Creating Speech and Language Data with Amazon's Mechanical Turk, pages 208- 211. Association for Computational Linguistics.
5. Lynne Bowker and Michael Barlow. 2008. A comparative evaluation of bilingual concordancers and translation memory systems. Topics in Language Resources for Translation and Localization, Amsterdam-Filadelfia: John Benjamins, pages 1-22.
6. Chris Callison-Burch. 2009. Fast, cheap, and creative: Evaluating translation quality using Amazon's Mechanical Turk. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 286-295, Singapore, August. Association for Computational Linguistics.
7. Tina Paulsen Christensen and Anne Gram Schjoldager. 2010. Translation-memory (tm) research: what do we know and how do we know it? Hermes, 44:89- 101.
8. George Doddington. 2002. Automatic evaluation of machine translation quality using n-gram cooccurrence statistics. In Proceedings of the second international conference on Human Language Technology Research, HLT '02, pages 138-145, San Francisco, CA, USA. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
9. Ignacio Garcia. 2007. Power shifts in web-based translation memory. Machine Translation, 21(1):55-68.
10. Yifan He, Yanjun Ma, Andy Way, and Josef Van Genabith. 2010. Integrating n-best smt outputs into a tm system. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters, pages 374-382. Association for Computational Linguistics.
11. Martin Kay. 1980. The proper place of men and machines in language translation. In Research Report CSL-80-11, Xerox PARC, Palo Alto, CA. Reprinted in Machine Translation 12, 3-23, 1997.
12. Philipp Koehn and Jean Senellart. 2010. Convergence of translation memory and statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of AMTA Workshop on MT Research and the Translation Industry, pages 21-31.
13. Alon Lavie, Kenji Sagae, and Shyamsundar Jayaraman. 2004. The significance of recall in automatic metrics for mt evaluation. In In Proceedings of the 6th Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas (AMTA-2004.
14. Vladimir I Levenshtein. 1966. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals. In Soviet physics doklady, volume 10, page 707.
15. Federica Mandreoli, Riccardo Martoglia, and Paolo Tiberio. 2006. Extra: A system for examplebased translation assistance. Machine Translation, 20(3):167-197.
16. Alan K Melby et al. 1981. A bilingual concordance system and its use in linguistic studies. In The Eighth Lacus Forum, pages 541-549, Columbia, SC.
17. Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei- Jing Zhu. 2002. Bleu: A method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting on association for computational linguistics, pages 311-318. Association for Computational Linguistics.
18. Michel Simard and Atsushi Fujita. 2012. A poor man's translation memory using machine translation evaluation metrics. In Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas 2012, San Diego, California, USA, October.
19. Harold L Somers. 2003. Computers and translation: A translator's guide, volume 35. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
20. Jorg Tiedemann. 2009. News from OPUS - A collection of multilingual parallel corpora with tools and interfaces. In N. Nicolov, K. Bontcheva, G. Angelova, and R. Mitkov, editors, Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, volume V, pages 237-248. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Borovets, Bulgaria.
21. Huihsin Tseng, Pichuan Chang, Galen Andrew, Daniel Jurafsky, and Christopher Manning. 2005. A conditional random field word segmenter for sighan bakeoff 2005. In Proceedings of the Fourth SIGHAN Workshop on Chinese Language Processing, volume 171. Jeju Island, Korea.
22. Edward K. Whyman and Harold L. Somers. 1999. Evaluation metrics for a translation memory system. Software-Practice and Experience, 29:1265-1284.
23. Fei Xia. 2000. The segmentation guidelines for the penn chinese treebank (3.0). Technical Report IRCS-00-06, University of Pennsylvania.