Primary care physicians' concerns may affect adolescents' access to intrauterine contraception

Journal of Primary Care and Community Health

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 216-219

  Rubin, Susan E ^a   Campos, Giselle ^a   Markens, Susan ^b,c  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescents; Birth control; Contraception counseling; Intrauterine contraception; Intrauterine device; Primary care; Qualitative research

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENT PREGNANCY; ADOLESCENTS; ARTICLE; BIRTH CONTROL; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTRACEPTION COUNSELING; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; GYNECOLOGY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; MALE; PEDIATRICS; PREGNANCY; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE; STANDARD; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADOLESCENTS; BIRTH CONTROL; CONTRACEPTION COUNSELING; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTION; INTRAUTERINE DEVICE; PRIMARY CARE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGY; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES; MALE; NEW YORK CITY; PEDIATRICS; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; PHYSICIANS, PRIMARY CARE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY IN ADOLESCENCE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84905636434     PISSN: 21501319     EISSN: 21501327     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/2150131912465314     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Ventura SJ, Curtin SC, Abma JC, Henshaw SK. Estimated pregnancy rates and rate of pregnancy outcomes for the United States, 1990-2008. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2012;60(7): 1-21.
2. Winner B, Peipert JF, Zhao Q, et al. Effectiveness of longacting reversible contraception. N Engl J Med. 2012;366: 1998-2007.
3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Long- Acting Reversible Contraception: Implants and Intrauterine Devices (Practice Bulletin No. 121). July 2011.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. U.S. medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2010. MMWR Early Release. 2010;59:88.
5. Committee Opinion 539, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:983-988.
6. Finer LB, Jerman J, Kavanaugh ML. Changes in use of longacting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007-2009. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:893-897.
7. Rubin SE, Fletcher J, Stein T, Segall-Gutierrez P, Gold M. Determinants of intrauterine contraception provision among US family physicians: a national survey of knowledge, attitudes and practice. Contraception. 2011;83:472-478.
8. Rubin SE, Fletcher J, Stein T, Gold M, Segall-Gutierrez P. Underuse of the IUD in contraceptive care and training. Fam Med. 2010;42:387-388.
9. Rubin SE, Davis K, McKee MD. New York City physicians' views of providing long-acting reversible contraception to adolescents. Ann Fam Med. In press.
10. Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Antibiotic prophylaxis for intrauterine contraceptive device insertion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(3).
11. Elders MJ. Contraceptive availability to adolescents: do American values violate our most vulnerable? Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;84:741-745.