The harm paradox: Tort law and the unwanted child in an era of choice

The Harm Paradox: Tort Law and the Unwanted Child in an Era of Choice

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-204

  Priaulx, Nicolette ^a  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905609232     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203945131     Document Type: Book

References (257)

1. Abel, R (1981), 'A Critique of American Tort Law', 8 British Journal of Law & Society, pp 199-231.
2. Abel, R (2006), 'General Damages are Incoherent, Incalculable, Incommensurable, and Inegalitarian (But Otherwise a Great Idea)', 55 DePaul Law Review, pp 253-327.
3. Abrams, K (1990), 'Ideology and Women's Choices', 24 Georgia Law Review, pp 761-801.
4. Annandale, E (2001), The Sociology of Health and Medicine: A Critical Introduction, Cambridge: Polity.
5. Ashe, M (1988), 'Law-Language of Maternity: Discourse Holding Nature in Contempt', 22 New England Law Review, pp 521-59.
6. Atiyah, PS (1997), The Damages Lottery, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
7. Atkins, S and Hoggett, B (1984), Women and the Law, Oxford: Blackwell.
8. Bailey, R (1996), 'Prenatal Testing and the Prevention of Impairment: A Woman's Right to Choose?', in Morris, J (ed), Encounters with Strangers, Feminism and Disability, London: The Women's Press.
9. Bandes, S (1999), 'Introduction' in Bandes, S (ed) Passions of Law, London: New York University Press.
10. Barnes, C, Mercer, G and Shakespeare, T (1999), Exploring Disability, Oxford: Polity.
11. Bartlett, J (1994), Will you be Mother? Women who Choose to Say No, London: Virago.
12. Bartlett, K (1988), 'Re-Expressing Parenthood', 98 Yale Law Journal, pp 295-340.
13. Beatson, J (2002), Anson's Law of Contract, Oxford: OUP.
14. Beauchamp, T and Childress, J (1994), Principles of Biomedical Ethics, Oxford: OUP.
15. Beck, U (1992), Risk Society, Towards a New Modernity, London: Sage Publications.
16. Beck, U and Beck-Gernsheim, E (2003), Individualization, Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences, London: Sage Publications.
17. Belcher, A (2000), 'The Not-Mother Puzzle', 9 Social & Legal Studies, pp 539-56.
18. Bender, L (1989), 'Changing the Values in Tort Law', 25 Tulsa Law Journal, pp 759-773.
19. Bender, L (1993), 'Teaching Feminist Perspectives on Health Care Ethics and Law: A Review Essay', 61 University of Cincinnati Law Review, pp 1251-76.
20. Bergum, V and Bendfeld, M (2001), 'Shifts of Attention: The Experience of Pregnancy in Dualist and Nondualist Cultures', in Tong, R (ed), Globalizing Feminist Ethics, Crosscultural Perspectives, Oxford: Westview.
21. Bernstein, A (2001), 'Motherhood, Health Status and Health Care', 11 Women's Health Issues, pp 173-84.
22. Beverage, F and Mullally, S (1995), 'International Human Rights and Body Politics', in Bridgeman, J and Millns, S (eds), Law and Body Politics: Regulating the Female Body, Aldershot: Dartmouth.
23. Biggs, H (2003), 'A Pretty Fine Line, Death, Autonomy and Letting It B', 11 Feminist Legal Studies, pp 291-301.
24. Block, N (1984), 'Wrongful Birth: The Avoidance of Consequences Doctrine in Mitigation of Damages', 53 Fordham Law Review, pp 1107-25.
25. Bordo, S (1993), Unbearable Weight, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
26. Boyle, M (1997), Re-Thinking Abortion, Psychology, Gender, Power and the Law, London: Routledge.
27. Brazier, M (2003), Medicine, Patients and the Law, London: Penguin Books.
28. Brenkert, G (1998), 'Self-Ownership, Freedom and Autonomy', 2 The Journal of Ethics, pp 27-55.
29. Bridge, C (1993), 'Changing the nature of adoption: law reform in England and New Zealand', 13 Legal Studies, pp 81-102.
30. Bridgeman, J and Millns, S (1998), Feminist Perspectives on Law, Law's Engagement with the Female Body, London: Sweet & Maxwell.
31. Brown, B (1993), 'Bodily Oppositions/Controlling Fantasies', in Bridgeman, J (ed), Body Politics: 'Control versus Freedom', The Role of Feminism in Women's Personal Autonomy, University of Liverpool: Feminist Legal Research Unit.
32. Buchanan, A, Brock, D, Daniels, N and Wikler, D (2000), From Chance to Choice, Genetics & Justice, Cambridge: CUP.
33. Budgeon, S (2003), 'Identity as an Embodied Event', 9 Body & Society, pp 35-55.
34. Calhoun, C (1999), 'Making up Emotional People: The Case of Romantic Love', in Bandes, S (ed), Passions of Law, London: NYUP.
35. Cane, P (1997), The Anatomy of Tort, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
36. Cane, P (2004), 'Another Failed Sterilisation', 120 Law Quarterly Review, pp 189-93.
37. Canguilhem, G (1991), The Normal and the Pathological, New York: Zone Books.
38. Carroll, L (1998), Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass, London: Penguin Books.
39. Chamallas, M and Kerber, L (1989), 'Women, Mothers, and the Law of Fright: A History', 88 Michigan Law Review, pp 814-64.
40. Clarke, L and Roberts, C (2002), 'Policy and rhetoric: The growing interest in fathers and grandparents in Britain', in Carling, A, Duncan, S and Edwards, R (eds), Analysing Families, Morality and Rationality in Policy and Practice, London: Routledge.
41. Colebrook, C (2000), 'Incorporeality: The Ghostly Body of Metaphysics', 6 Body & Society, pp 25-44.
42. Collier, R (2001), 'A Hard Time to Be a Father?: Reassessing the Relationship Between Law, Policy, and Family (Practices), 28 Journal of Law and Society, pp 520-45.
43. Comment (1995), 'Walkin v South Manchester HA [1995] 4 All ER 132', Journal of Personal Injury Litigation, pp 236-8.
44. Conaghan, J (1996), 'Tort Law and the Feminist Critique of Reason', in Bottomley, A (ed), Feminist Perspectives on the Foundational Subjects of Law, London: Cavendish Publishing.
45. Conaghan, J (1998), 'Tort Litigation in the Context of Intra-Family Abuse', 61 MLR, pp 132-61.
46. Conaghan, J (2002), 'Law, harm and redress: a feminist perspective', 22 Legal Studies, pp 319-39.
47. Conaghan, J (2003), 'Tort Law and Feminist Critique', 56 Current Legal Problems, pp 175-209.
48. Conaghan, J and Mansell, W (1999), The Wrongs of Tort, London: Pluto.
49. Cooke, J and Oughton, D (2000), The Common Law of Obligations, London: Butterworths.
50. Dalton, C (1985), 'An Essay in the Deconstruction of Contract Doctrine', 94 Yale Law Journal, pp 997-1114.
51. Davies, M (2001), Textbook on Medical Law, London: Blackstone Press.
52. Deech, R (1998), 'Family Law and Genetics', 61 MLR, pp 697-715.
53. Dick, P (1968), Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? London: Millennium.
54. Dickens, B (1990), 'Wrongful Birth and Life, Wrongful Death Before Birth, and Wrongful Law', in McLean, S (ed), Legal Issues in Human Reproduction, Dartmouth: Aldershot.
55. Diduck, A (1993), 'Legislating Ideologies of Motherhood', 2 Social & Legal Studies, pp 461-85.
56. Dixon, C (2004), 'An unconventional gloss on unintended children', 153 NLJ, pp 1732-33.
57. Donnelly, M (1997), 'The Injury of Parenthood: The Tort of Wrongful Conception', 48 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, pp 10-23.
58. Douglas, G (1991), Law, Fertility & Reproduction, London: Sweet & Maxwell.
59. Douzinas, C and McVeigh, S (1992), 'The Tragic Body: The Inscription of Autonomy in Medical Ethics and Law', in McVeigh, S and Wheeler, S (eds), Law, Health & Medical Regulation, Hants: Dartmouth Publishing.
60. Editorial (1998), 'Health care and the human body', 1 Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, pp 103-5.
61. Eisenstein, Z (1988), The Female Body and the Law, London: University of California Press.
62. Engelhadt, T (2001), 'The Many Faces of Autonomy', 9 Health Care Analysis, pp 283-97.
63. Estin, A (1994), 'Love and Obligation: Family law and the Romance of Economics', 36 William & Mary Law Review, pp 989-1087.
64. Evans, M (2001), 'The "Medical Body" As Philosophy's Arena', 22 Theoretical Medicine, pp 17-32.
65. Evans, M (2003), Love, an unromantic discussion, Cambridge: Polity.
66. Fathers Direct (2001), 'Father Facts: What Good are Dads?', accessed 22 October 2006, www.fathersdirect.com/index.php?id=3&cID=111.
67. Fegan, E (1999), "'Subjects" of Regulation/Resistance? Postmodern Feminism and Agency in Abortion-Decision Making', 7 Feminist Legal Studies, pp 241-73.
68. Fegan, E (2002), 'Recovering Women: Intimate Images and Legal Strategy', 11 Social & Legal Studies, pp 155-83.
69. Fegan, E and Rebouche, R (2003), 'Northern Ireland's Abortion Law: The Morality of Silence and the Censure of Agency', 11 Feminist Legal Studies, pp 221-54.
70. Feinberg, J (1984), Harm to Others, Oxford: OUP.
71. Fineman, M (1999), 'Cracking the Foundational Myths: Independence, Autonomy and Self-Sufficiency', 8 American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy and the Law, pp 13-29.
72. Feinberg, J (2004), The Autonomy Myth, London: The New Press.
73. Finley, L (1989), 'Breaking Women's Silence in law: The Dilemma of the Gendered Nature of Legal Reasoning', 64 Notre Dame Law Review, pp 886-910.
74. Fitzpatrick, P (1997), 'Distant Relations: The New Constructionism in Critical and Socio-Legal Studies', in Thomas, P (ed), Socio-Legal Studies, Dartmouth: Aldershot.
75. Fitzpatrick, T (2001), 'Contributory negligance and contract-a critical assessment', 30 Common Law World Review, pp 255-271.
76. Fleming, J (1992), The Law of Torts, Sydney: Law Book Co.
77. Fox, M (1998), 'A Woman's Right to Choose? A Feminist Critique', in Harris, J and Holm, S (eds), The Future of Reproduction, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
78. Franke, K (2001), 'Theorising Yes: An Essay on Feminism, Law and Desire', 101 Columbia Law Review, pp 181-208.
79. Friedman, D, Hechter, M and Kanazawa, S (1994), 'A Theory of the Value of Children', 31 Demography, pp 375-401.
80. Friedman, M (2003), Autonomy, Gender, Politics, Oxford: OUP.
81. Furedi, A (1998), 'Wrong but the Right Thing to Do: Public Opinion and Abortion', in Lee, E (ed), Abortion Law and Politics Today, London: Macmillan Press.
82. Furedi, F (1999), Courting Mistrust: The Hidden Growth of a Culture of Litigation in Britain, London: Centre for Policy Studies.
83. Furedi, F (2003), Culture of Fear, London: Continuum.
84. Galligan, T (1999), 'The Tragedy in Torts', 5 Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, pp 139-83.
85. Gardner, J (2003), 'The Mark of Responsibility', 23 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, pp 157-71.
86. Giddens, A (1991), Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Cambridge: Polity.
87. Giddens, A (1999a), 'Risk and Responsibility', 62 MLR, pp 1-10.
88. Giddens, A (1999b), 'Runaway World: the Reith Lectures Revisited', London: 1999-2000 Director's Lectures, accessed 23 September 2006, www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/ reith1999/.
89. Gilligan, C (1982), In A Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
90. Gilligan, C (1985), 'Feminist Discourse, Moral Values and the Law-A Conversation', 34 Buffalo Law Review, pp 11-87 (with discussants, DuBois, E, Dunlap, M, MacKinnon, A and Menkel-Meadow, C).
91. Glover, J (1977), Causing Death and Saving Lives, London: Penguin Books.
92. Goodrich, P (1995-96), 'Law in the Courts of Love: Andreas Capellanus and the Judgments of Love', 48 Stanford Law Review, pp 633-75.
93. Graycar, R (1995), 'Damaged Awards: The Vicissitudes of Life as a Woman', 3 Torts Law Journal, pp 1-21.
94. Graycar, R (1997), 'Hoovering as a Hobby and Other Stories', 31 British Columbia Law Review, pp 17-35.
95. Graycar, R (1998), 'The Gender of Judgments: Some Reflections on "Bias" ', 32 The University of British Columbia Law Review, pp 1-21.
96. Graycar, R (2002), 'Sex, golf and stereotypes: measuring, valuing and imagining the body in court', 10 Torts Law Journal, pp 205-21.
97. Graycar, R and Morgan, J (1996), ' "Unnatural rejection of womanhood and motherhood": Pregnancy, Damage and the Law, A note on CES v Superclinics (Aust) Pty', 18 The Sydney Law Review, pp 323-41.
98. Graycar, R and Morgan, J (2002), The Hidden Gender of Law, Sydney: Federation Press.
99. Grosz, E (1994), Volatile Bodies, Toward a Corporeal Feminism, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
100. Grubb, A (1985), 'Failure of Sterilisation-damages for "wrongful conception" ', 44 Cambridge Law Journal, pp 30-2.
101. Hale, B (2001), 'The Value of Life and the Cost of Living-Damages for Wrongful Birth', 7 British Actuarial Journal, pp 747-63.
102. Harden, A and Ogden, J (1999), 'Young women's experiences of arranging and having abortions', 21 Sociology of Health & Illness, pp 426-44.
103. Harris, D, Campbell, D and Halson, R (2002), Remedies in Contract & Tort, London: Butterworths LexisNexis.
104. Harris, J (2001), 'Human Beings, Persons and Conjoined Twins: An Ethical Analysis of the Judgment in Re A', 9 Med L Rev, pp 221-36.
105. Heller, J (1961), Catch 22, London: Corgi Books.
106. Hensel, W (2005), 'The Disabling Impact of Wrongful Birth and Wrongful Life Actions', 40 Harvard Civil Rights Civil Liberties Law Review, pp 141-95.
107. Herbert, A (1936), Uncommon Law, London: Methuen & Co.
108. Hildt, E (2002), 'Autonomy and freedom of choice in prenatal genetic diagnosis', 5 Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, pp 65-71.
109. Himmelweit, S (2002), 'Economic theory, norms and the care gap, or why do economists become parents?', in Carling, A, Duncan, S and Edwards, R (eds), Analysing Families, Morality and Rationality in Policy and Practice, London: Routledge.
110. Hoyano, L (2002), 'Misconceptions about Wrongful Conception', 65 MLR, pp 883-906.
111. Hudson, A (1983), 'Refusal of Medical Treatment', 3 Legal Studies, pp 50-9.
112. Hyde, A (1997), Bodies of Law, Chichester: Princeton University Press.
113. Jackson, A (1995), 'Action for Wrongful Life, Wrongful Pregnancy and Wrongful Birth in the United States and England', 17 Loyola of Los Angeles International & Comparative Law Journal, pp 535-613.
114. Jackson, A (1996), 'Wrongful Life and Wrongful Birth', 17 The Journal of Legal Medicine, pp 349-81.
115. Jackson, E (2000), 'Abortion, Autonomy and Prenatal Diagnosis', 9 Social & Legal Studies, pp 467-94.
116. Jackson, E (2001), Regulating Reproduction, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
117. Jackson, E (2002), 'Conception and the Irrelevance of the Welfare Principle', 65 MLR, pp 176-203.
118. Jackson, E (2005), Medical Law, Text, Cases and Materials, Oxford: OUP.
119. Jones, M (2002), Textbook on Torts, Oxford: OUP.
120. Judicial Studies Board (2004), Guidelines for the Assessment of General Damages in Personal Injury Cases, Oxford: OUP.
121. Karpin, I (1992), 'Legislating the Female Body: Reproductive Technology and the Reconstructed Woman', 3 Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, pp 325-49.
122. Kennedy, I (1981), The Unmasking of Medicine, London: George Allen & Unwin.
123. Keywood, K (2000), 'More than a Woman? Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Medical Law', 8 Feminist Legal Studies, pp 319-42.
124. Kosko, B (1994), Fuzzy Thinking, The New Science of Fuzzy Logic, London: Flamingo.
125. Kuhn, T (1996), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, London: University of Chicago Press.
126. Lacey, N (1998), Unspeakable Subjects, Feminist Essays in Legal and Social Theory, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
127. Lattimer, M (1998) 'Dominant Ideas versus Women's Reality: Hegemonic Discourses in British Abortion Law', in Lee, E (ed), Abortion Law and Politics Today, London: Macmillan Press.
128. Lawson, A (1996), 'The Things We Do For Love: Detrimental Reliance in the Family Home', 16 Legal Studies, pp 218-31.
129. Lee, E (2002), 'Psychologizing Abortion: Women's "Mental Health" and the Regulation of Abortion in Britain', in Morris, A and Nott, S (eds), Well women, the gendered nature of health care provision, Aldershot: Ashgate.
130. Lee, E (2003a), 'Tensions in the Regulation of Abortion in Britain', 30 Journal of Law and Society, pp 532-53.
131. Lee, E (2003b), Abortion, Motherhood and Mental Health, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
132. Lee, E (2003c), 'The Context for the Development of 'Post-Abortion Syndrome', accessed 23 September 2006, www.prochoiceforum.org.uk/psy_coun9.asp.
133. Lee, E and Jackson, E (2002), 'The Pregnant Body', in Evans, M and Lee, E (eds), Real Bodies, A Sociological Introduction, Hampshire: Palgrave.
134. Levine, P and Steiger, D (2001), 'Abortion as Pregnancy Insurance', accessed 23 September 2006, http://irm.wharton.upenn.edu/F01-Levine.pdf.
135. Lunney, M (2004), 'A Right Old Mess: Rees v Darlington Health Authority [2003] 3 WLR 1091', 1 UNELJ, pp 145-55.
136. Lupton, D (1999), Risk, London: Routledge.
137. Lury, C (1998), Prosthetic Culture: Photography, Memory and Identity, London: Routledge.
138. MacKenzie, C (1992), 'Abortion and Embodiment', 70 Australian Journal of Philosophy, pp 136-55.
139. Mackenzie, R (1999), 'From Sanctity to Screening: Genetic Disabilities, Risk and Rhetorical Strategies in Wrongful Birth and Wrongful Conception Cases', 7 Feminist Legal Studies, pp 175-91.
140. Macklem, T and Gardner, J (2001), 'Provocation and Pluralism', 64 MLR, pp 815-30.
141. Maclean, A (2000), 'McFarlane v Tayside Health Board: A Wrongful Conception in the House of Lords', 3 Web JCLI, accessed 23 September 2006, http://webjcli.ncl.ac.uk/2000/issue3/maclean3.html.
142. Maclean, A (2004), 'Distributing the Burden of a Blessing', 3 Journal of Obligations & Remedies, pp 23-45.
143. Mahendra, B (1995), 'Thrown to Woolf', 145 NLJ, pp 1375-76.
144. Mark, D (1976), 'Liability for Failure of Birth Control Methods', 76 Columbia Law Review, pp 1187-204.
145. Markesinis, B and Deakin, S (1999), Tort Law, Oxford: OUP.
146. Mason, J (1990/1998), Medico-Legal Aspects of Reproduction and Parenthood, Aldershot: Ashgate.
147. Markesinis, B (2000), 'Unwanted Pregnancy: A Case of Retroversion?', 4 Edinburgh Law Review, pp 191-206.
148. Markesinis, B (2002), 'Wrongful Pregnancy, Wrongful Birth and Wrongful Terminology', 6 The Edinburgh Law Review, pp 46-66.
149. Markesinis, B (2004), 'A Turn-up Down Under: McFarlane in the Light of Cattanach', 1:1 Script-ed, pp 1-18, accessed 23 September 2006, www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrb/script-ed/ docs/mason.pdf.
150. Markesinis, B, McCall Smith, R and Laurie, G (1999/2002), Law and Medical Ethics, London: Butterworths LexisNexis.
151. McCall Smith, A (1997), 'Beyond Autonomy', 14 Journal of Contemporary Health Law & Policy, pp 23-39.
152. McDonagh, E (1996), Breaking the Abortion Deadlock: From Choice to Consent, New York: OUP.
153. Mee, J (1992), 'Wrongful Conception: The Emergence of a Full Recovery Rule', 70 Washington University Law Quarterly, pp 887-914.
154. Meyer, D (2000), 'The Paradox of Family Privacy', 53 Vanderbilt Law Review, pp 527-95.
155. Millns, S (2001), 'The Human Rights Act 1998 and Reproductive Rights', 54 Parliamentary Affairs, pp 475-94.
156. Milsteen, J (1983), 'Recovery of Childrearing Expenses in Wrongful Birth Cases: A Motivational Analysis', 32 Emory Law Journal, pp 1167-97.
157. Monti, G (1999), 'A reasonable woman standard in sexual harassment litigation', 19 Legal Studies, pp 552-79.
158. Moran, M (2003), Rethinking the Reasonable Person, Oxford, OUP.
159. Morell, C (2000), 'Saying No: Women's Experiences with Reproductive Refusal', 10 Feminism & Psychology, pp 313-22.
160. Morgan, D (1990), 'Abortion: the unexamined ground', Criminal Law Review, pp 687-94.
161. Morgan, D (2001), Issues in Medical Law and Ethics, London: Cavendish Publishing.
162. Morgan, J (2004), 'Tort, Insurance and Incoherence', 67 MLR, pp 384-401.
163. Morgan, K (1991), 'Women and the Knife: Cosmetic Surgery and the Colonization of Women's Bodies', in Sherwin, S and Parish, B (eds), Women, Medicine, Ethics and the Law, Aldershot: Ashgate.
164. Morris, A (2004), 'Another fine mess. The aftermath of McFarlane and the decision in Rees v Darlington Memorial Hospital NHS Trust', 20(1) Professional Negligence, pp 2-16.
165. Morris, A and Nott, S (1995), 'The Law's Engagement with Pregnancy', in Bridgeman, J and Millns, S (eds), Law and Body Politics, Regulating the Female Body, Aldershot: Dartmouth.
166. Morris, J (1991), Pride Against Prejudice, London: The Women's Press.
167. Mullender, R (2003), 'Tort, Human Rights, and Common Law Culture', 23 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, pp 301-18.
168. Mullin, A (2002), 'Pregnant bodies, pregnant minds', 3 Feminist Theory, pp 27-44.
169. Mullis, A (1993), 'Wrongful Conception Unravelled', 1 Med L Rev, pp 320-35.
170. Murphy, J (1994), 'Some ruminations on women, violence, and the criminal law', in Coleman, J and Buchanan, A (eds), In Harm's Way, Essays in Honor of Joel Feinberg, Cambridge: CUP.
171. Naffine, N (1994), 'Possession: Erotic Love in the Law of Rape', 57 MLR, pp 10-37.
172. Naffine, N (1998), 'The Legal Structure of Self-Ownership: Or the Self-Possessed Man and the Woman Possessed', 25 Journal of Law and Society, pp 193-212.
173. Naffine, N (2002), 'In Praise of Legal Feminism', 22 Legal Studies, pp 71-101.
174. Naffine, N (2003), 'Who are Law's Persons? From Cheshire Cats to Responsible Subjects', 66 MLR, pp 346-67.
175. Nedelsky, J (1989), 'Reconceiving Autonomy: Sources, Thoughts and Possibilities', 1 Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, pp 7-36.
176. Naffine, N (1997), 'Embodied Diversity and the Challenges to Law', 42 McGill Law Journal, pp 91-117.
177. Nesse, R (2001), 'On the difficulty of defining disease: A Darwinian perspective', 4 Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, pp 37-46.
178. Norrie, K (1988), 'Compensation for Wrongful Birth: An Examination of the Principles Governing a Physician's Liability in Scots Law for the Failure of a Family Planning Procedure', unpublished PhD thesis, University of Aberdeen.
179. Norton, F (1999), 'Assisted Reproduction and the Frustration of Genetic Affinity: Interest, Injury, and Damages', 74 New York University Law Review, pp 793-843.
180. Nussbaum, M (2000), 'The Cost of Tragedy: Some Moral Limits of Cost-Benefit Analysis', in Adler, M and Posner, E (eds), Cost-Benefit Analyses, London: University of Chicago Press.
181. Orr, S and Miller, C (1997), 'Unintended Pregnancy and the Psychosocial Well-Being of Pregnant Women', 7 Women's Health Issues, pp 38-46.
182. O'Sullivan, J (2004), 'The answer is so simple. Just ask Dad', The Times, 23 November.
183. Peppin, P (1996), 'A Feminist Challenge to Tort Law', in Bottomley, A (ed), Feminist Perspectives on the Foundational Subjects of Law, London, Cavendish Publishing.
184. Petchesky, R (1986), Abortion and Women's Choice, Northeastern University Press.
185. Peters, T (1996), 'Multiple Choice in Baby Making', 16 Word & World, pp 11-23.
186. Petersen, K (1996), 'Wrongful Conception and Birth: The Loss of Reproductive Freedom and Medical Irresponsibility', 18 Sydney Law Review, pp 503-22.
187. Phillips, C (2001), 'Re-imagining the (Dis)Abled Body', 22 Journal of Medical Humanities, pp 195-208.
188. Pomeroy, J (1992), 'Reason, Religion and Avoidable Consequences: When Faith and the Duty to Mitigate Collide', 67 New York University Law Review, pp 1111-56.
189. Posner, R (1999), 'Emotion versus Emotionalism in Law', in Bandes, S (ed), Passions of Law, London: New York University Press.
190. Priaulx, N (2006), 'Beyond Health & Disability: Rethinking the "Foetal Abnormality" Ground in Abortion Law', in Biggs, H and Horsey K (eds), The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990: Reproducing Regulation, London: Routledge-Cavendish.
191. Prosser, W (1971), Handbook of the Law of Torts, St Paul: West Publishing Co.
192. Purdy, L (1997), 'Babystrike!', in Nelson, H (ed), Feminism and Families, New York: Routledge.
193. Purdy, L (2001), 'Medicalization, Medical Necessity and Feminist Medicine', 15 Bioethics, pp 248-61.
194. Purdy, L (2006), 'Women's reproductive autonomy: medicalisation and beyond', 32 JME, pp 287-91.
195. Quick, O (2002), 'Damages for Wrongful Conception', Tort Law Review, pp 5-10.
196. Rackley, E (2006), 'Difference in the House of Lords', 15 Social & Legal Studies, pp 163-85.
197. Radcliffe-Richards, J (1999), 'Abortion on grounds of foetal abnormality', in Biggs, H and Lee, L (eds), Abortion, Ethics and the Law, Canterbury: University of Kent.
198. Radin, M (1987), 'Market-Inalienability', 100 Harvard Law Review, pp 1849-932.
199. Radley-Gardener, O (2002), 'Wrongful Birth Revisited', 118 The Law Quarterly Review, pp 11-15.
200. Rawlinson, Lord (1994), 'The Physical and Psycho-Social Effects of Abortion upon Women', London: A Report by the Commission of Inquiry into the Operation and Consequence of the Abortion Act.
201. Read, J (2000), Disability, The Family and Society, Listening to Mothers, Buckingham: Open University Press.
202. Reece, H (2003), Divorcing Responsibly, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
203. Reichman, A (1985), 'Damages in Tort For Wrongful Conception-Who Bears the Cost of Raising the Child?', 10 Sydney Law Review, pp 568-90.
204. Richardson, J (2004), 'Feminist perspectives on the law of tort and the technology of risk', 33 Economy and Society, pp 98-120.
205. Ripstein, A (1999), Equality, Responsibility and the Law, Cambridge: CUP.
206. Robertson, G (1978), 'Civil Liability Arising from "Wrongful Birth" Following an Unsuccessful Sterilization Operation', 4 American Journal of Law and Medicine, pp 131-156.
207. Rogers, W (1985), 'Legal Implications of Ineffective Sterilization', Legal Studies, pp 296-313.
208. Rogers, W (2002), Winfield and Jolowicz on Tort, London: Sweet & Maxwell.
209. Rosenbaum, T (2003), The Myth of Moral Justice, New York: HarperCollins.
210. Rössler, B (2002), 'Problems with Autonomy', 17 Hypatia, pp 143-62.
211. Rothman, B (1988), The Tentative Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis and the Future of Motherhood, London: Pandora Press.
212. Rúdólfsdóttir, A (2000), ' "I Am Not a Patient, and I Am Not a Child": The Institutionalization and Experience of Pregnancy', 10 Feminism & Psychology, pp 337-50.
213. Ryan, M (1999), 'The Argument for Unlimited Procreative Liberty: A Feminist Critique', in Robertson, J, Berry, R and McDonnell, K (eds), A Health Law Reader, Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
214. Ryan, S (1994), 'Wrongful Birth: False Representations of Women's Reproductive Lives', 78 Minnesota Law Review, pp 857-909.
215. Samuel, G (2001), Law of Obligations and Legal Remedies, London: Cavendish Publishing.
216. Savulescu, J (2001), 'Is current practice around late termination of pregnancy eugenic and discriminatory? Maternal interests and abortion', 27 JME, pp 165-71.
217. Savulescu, J (2002), 'Is there a "right not to be born"? Reproductive decision-making, options and the right to information', 28 JME, pp 65-67.
218. Schwartz, B (2004), The Paradox of Choice, New York: HarperCollins.
219. Scott, R (2003), 'Prenatal Screening, Autonomy and Reasons: The Relationship Between the Law of Abortion and Wrongful Birth', 11 Med L Rev, 265-325.
220. Seuffert, N (1999), 'Domestic Violence, Discourses of Romantic Love and Complex Personhood in the Law', 23 Melbourne University Law Review, pp 211-40.
221. Seymour, J (2000), Childbirth and the Law, Oxford: OUP.
222. Sheldon, S (1995), 'The Law of Abortion and the Politics of Medicalisation', in Bridgeman, J and Millns, S (eds), Law and Body Politics: Regulating the Female Body, Aldershot: Dartmouth.
223. Sheldon, S (1997), Beyond Control, Medical Power and Abortion Law, London: Pluto Press.
224. Sheldon, S (1998), 'The Abortion Act 1967: A Critical Perspective', in Lee, E (ed), Abortion Law and Politics Today, London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
225. Sheldon, S (1999), 'Re Conceiving Masculinity: Imagining Men's Reproductive Bodies in Law', 26 Journal of Law and Society, pp 129-49.
226. Sheldon, S (2003), 'Unwilling Fathers and Abortion: Terminating Men's Child Support Obligations?', 66 MLR, pp 175-94.
227. Sheldon, S (2004), 'Revealing cracks in the "twin pillars"?', 16 Child and Family Law Quarterly, pp 437-52.
228. Sheldon, S and Wilkinson, S (2001), 'Termination of Pregnancy for Reason of Foetal Disability: Are There Grounds For A Special Exception In Law?', 9 Med L Rev, pp 85-109.
229. Sherwin, S (1998), 'A Relational Approach in the Politics of Health', in Sherwin, S (ed) The Politics of Women's Health, Exploring Agency and Autonomy, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
230. Silbaugh, K (1996), 'Turning Labour into Love: Housework and the Law', 91 Northwestern University Law Review, pp 25-86.
231. Simons, K (1997), 'Contributory Negligence: Conceptual and Normative Issues', in Owen, D (ed), Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law, Oxford: OUP.
232. Smith, S (2004), Contract Theory, Oxford: OUP.
233. Stapleton, J (1988), 'The Gist of Negligence', 104 The Law Quarterly Review, pp 213-38.
234. Stapleton, J (1995), 'Tort, Insurance and Ideology', 58 MLR, pp 820-45.
235. Stapleton, J (2001), 'Legal Cause: Cause-in-Fact and the Scope of Liability for Consequences' 54 Vanderbilt Law Review, pp 941-1009.
236. Steele, J (2004), Risks and Legal Theory, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
237. Strangeways, S (2003), 'You could have had abortion: Law Lord', UK Newsquest Regional Press-This is The NorthEast, 17 October 2003.
238. Stychin, C (1998), 'Body Talk: Rethinking Autonomy, Commodification and the Embodied Legal Self', in Sheldon, S and Thomson, M (eds), Feminist Perspectives On Health Care Law, London: Cavendish.
239. Symmons, C (1987), 'Policy Factors in Actions for Wrongful Birth', 50 MLR, pp 269-306.
240. Talbot, C and Williams, M (2003), 'Kinship Care', 33 Fam Law, pp 502-7.
241. Thomas, C (2002), 'The "Disabled" Body', in Evans, M and Lee, E (eds), Real Bodies, A Sociological Introduction, New York: Palgrave.
242. Vehmas, S (2002), 'Parental responsibility and the morality of selective abortion', 5 Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, pp 463-84.
243. Waldron, J (2000), 'The Role of Rights in Practical Reasoning: "Rights" versus "Needs" ', 4 The Journal of Ethics, pp 115-35.
244. Watson, N (1998), 'Enabling Identity: Disability, Self and Citizenship', in Shakespeare, T (ed), The Disability Reader, London: Continuum.
245. Weir, T (2000), A Casebook on Tort, London: Sweet & Maxwell.
246. Weir, T (2001), Tort Law, Oxford: OUP.
247. West, R (1985a), 'Authority, Autonomy and Choice: The Role of Consent in the Moral and Political Visions of Franz Kafka and Richard Posner', 99 Harvard Law Review, pp 384-428.
248. Weir, T (1985b), 'Submission, Choice and Ethics: A Rejoinder to Judge Posner', 99 Harvard Law Review, pp 1449-56.
249. Weir, T (1988), 'Jurisprudence and Gender', 55 University of Chicago Law Review, pp 1-72.
250. Weir, T (1997), Caring For Justice, London: NYUP.
251. Whitfield, A (1998), 'Actions Arising from Birth', in Kennedy, I and Grubb, A (eds), Principles of Medical Law, Oxford: OUP.
252. Whitfield, A (2002), 'The fallout from McFarlane', 18 Professional Negligence, pp 234-47.
253. Wilkinson, S (2003), Bodies for Sale, London: Routledge.
254. Williams, J (1988), 'Deconstructing Gender', 87 Michigan Law Review, pp 797-845.
255. Witting, C (2002), 'Physical Damage in Negligence', 6 Cambridge Law Journal, pp 189-208.
256. Wong, S (1998), 'Constructive Trusts Over the Family Home: Lessons to be Learned from other Commonwealth Jurisdictions?', 18 Legal Studies, pp 369-90.
257. Wyndham, J (1955), The Chrysalids, London: Penguin Books.