Aspettandosi il male minore dall'ingroup Asimmetrie di potere tra gruppi e distribuzione di penalità

Psicologia Sociale

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 425-446

  Moscatelli, Silvia ^a   Rubini, Monica ^a   Albarello, Flavia ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905573170     PISSN: 18272517     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1482/28381     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Amiot C.E., Bourhis R.Y. (2005). Discrimination between dominant and subordinate groups: The positive-negative asymmetry effect and normative processes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 289-308.
2. Baron R.M., Kenny D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
3. Brown R.J. (2000). Social Identity Theory: Past achievement, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 745-778.
4. Diehl M. (1990). The minimal group paradigm: Theoretical explanations and empirical findings. In W. Stroebe, M. Hewstone (a cura di), European Review of Social Psychology. Chichester: Wiley, vol. 1, pp. 263-292.
5. Doise W. (2004). On the difficulty of broadening perspectives in the study of intergroup relations. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 31, 95-98.
6. Doise W. (2007). Vers un monde plus juste. Manoscritto inviato per revisione.
7. Gaertner L., Insko C.A. (2000). Intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: Categorisation, reciprocation, or fear? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 77-94.
8. Gaertner L., Sedikides C., Graetz K. (1999). Motivational primacy of the individual self, motivational primacy of the collective self, or contextual primacy? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 5-18.
9. Gardham K., Brown R.J. (2001). Two forms of intergroup discrimination with positive and negative outcomes: Explaining the positive-negative asymmetry effect. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 23-34.
10. Hornsey M.J., Spears R., Cremers I., Hogg M.A. (2003). Relations between high and low power groups: The importance of legitimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 216-227.
11. Horwitz M. (1963). Hostility and its management in classroom groups. In W.W. Charters, N.L. Gage (a cura di), Readings in the social psychology of education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
12. Horwitz M., Rabbie J.M. (1982). Individuality and membership in the intergroup system. In H. Tajfel (a cura di), Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 241-274.
13. Jones J.M. (1972). Prejudice and racism. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishers.
14. Lewin K. (1948). Resolving social conflict. New York: Harper e Row.
15. Maass A. (1999). Linguistic intergroup bias: Stereotypes-perpetuation through language. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 79-131.
16. Messick D.M., Mackie D.M. (1989). Intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 45-81.
17. Mlicki P.P. (1993). Us and Them. The effects of categorisation and interdependence on identification within, and differentiation between categories and groups. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.
18. Moscatelli S., Rubini M., Albarello F. (2005, luglio). Group size, group status and common fate as determinants of group interdependence and linguistic intergroup discrimination. Poster presentato al XIV General Meeting of the EAESP, Wörzburg, Germany.
19. Mummendey A., Otten S., Berger U., Kessler T. (2000). Positive-negative asymmetry in social discrimination: Valence of evaluation and salience of categorization. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 26, 1258-1270.
20. Mummendey A., Simon B., Dietze C., Grunert M., Haeger G., Kessler S., Lettgen S., Schaferhoff S. (1992). Categorisation is not enough: Intergroup discrimination in negative outcome allocation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 125-144.
21. Ng S.H. (1982). Power and intergroup discrimination. In H. Tajfel (a cura di), Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 179-206.
22. Otten S., Mummendey A. (2000). Valence-dependent probability of ingroup favouritism between minimal groups: An integrative view of the positive-negative asymmetry in social discrimination. In D. Capozza, R.J. Brown (a cura di), Social identity processes: Trends in theory and research. London: Sage Publications, pp. 33-49.
23. Otten S., Mummendey A., Blanz M. (1996). Intergroup discrimination in positive and negative outcome allocations: Impact of stimulus valence, relative group status, and relative group size. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 568-581.
24. Perreault S., Bourhis R.Y. (1998). Social identification, interdependence and discrimination. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 1, 49-66.
25. Rabbie J.M. (1993). A behavioural interaction model: Towards an integrative framework for studying intra-And intergroup relations. In K.S. Larson (a cura di), Conflict and Social Psychology. Beverly Hills, CA: PRIO/Sage, pp. 86-109.
26. Rabbie J.M., Horwitz M. (1988). Categories versus groups as explanatory concepts in intergroup relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 117-122.
27. Rabbie J.M., Schot J.C., Visser L. (1989). Social identity theory: A conceptual and empirical critique from the perspective of a behavioural interaction model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 171-202.
28. Rubini M. (2003). Henry Tajfel: dai processi di categorizzazione al pregiudizio sociale. In A. Palmonari e N. Cavazza (a cura di), Ricerche e protagonisti della psicologia sociale. Bologna: Il Mulino.
29. Rubini M., Moscatelli S. (2004a). Categorie o gruppi sociali? Alle radici della discriminazione intergruppi. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 31, 25-68.
30. Rubini M., Moscatelli S. (2004b). Categorizzazione ed interdipendenza: due punti di vista epistemologici per lo studio delle relazioni intergruppi. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 31, 875-886.
31. Rubini M., Moscatelli S., Albarello F., Palmonari A. (2007). Group power as a determinant of interdependence and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1203-1221.
32. Sachdev I., Bourhis R.Y. (1985). Social categorisation and power differentials in group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 415-434.
33. Sachdev I., Bourhis R.Y. (1991). Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 1-24.
34. Scheepers D., Spears R., Doosje B., Manstead A.S.R. (2005). Integrating identity and instrumental approaches to intergroup differentiation: Different contexts, different motives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1455-1467.
35. Sherif M. (1966). Group conflict and co-operation. London: Routledge e Kegan Paul.
36. Stroebe K., Lodewijkx H.F.M., Spears R. (2005). Do unto others as they do unto you: Reciprocity and social identification as determinants of ingroup favouritism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 831-845.
37. Tajfel H. (1982). Instrumentality, identity, and social comparisons. In H. Tajfel (a cura di), Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 483-507.
38. Tajfel H., Billig M.G., Bundy R.P., Flament C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178.
39. Tajfel H., Turner J.C. (1979). An integrative theory of social conflicts. In W.G. Austin, S. Worchel (a cura di), The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey: Brooks-Cole, pp. 33-47.
40. Turner J.C., Bourhis R.Y. (1996). Social identity, interdependence and the social group: A reply to Rabbie et al. In W.P. Robinson (a cura di), Social groups and identity: Developing the legacy of Henry Tajfel. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
41. Turner J.C., Brown R.J., Tajfel H. (1979). Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 159-171.
42. Yamagishi T., Kiyonari T. (2000). The group as the container of generalized reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 116-132.