Ligasure versus stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: A meta-analysis of randomized control trials

Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 285-289

  Chen, Hong Lei ^a   Woo, Xiao Bin ^a   Cui, Ji ^a   Chen, Chuang Qi ^a   Peng, Jun Sheng ^a  

^a SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Hemorrhoidectomy; Hemorrhoids; Ligasure; Meta analysis; PPH; Stapled hemorrhoidectomy

Indexed keywords

ANAL STENOSIS; ANUS FISSURE; COCHRANE LIBRARY; DEFECATION DISORDER; DIFFICULT DEFECATING; FOLLOW UP; HEMORRHOID; HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INCONTINENCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIGASURE HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RECURRENCE RISK; REVIEW; STAPLED HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; STENOSIS; SURGICAL STAPLING; URINE RETENTION; VESSEL SEALING SYSTEM; DEVICES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEMORRHOIDS; LIGATION; PROCEDURES; SUTURING METHOD; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; HEMORRHOIDS; HUMANS; LIGATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; SURGICAL STAPLING; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84905490051     PISSN: 15304515     EISSN: 15344908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000009     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Chung YC, Wu HJ. Clinical experience of sutureless closed hemorrhoidectomy with LigaSure. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46: 87-92.
2. Ommer A, Hinrichs J, Möllenberg H, et al. Long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: a prospective study with a 6-year follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:601-608.
3. Kraemer M, Parulava T, Roblick M, et al. Prospective, randomized study: proximate PPH stapler vs. LigaSure for hemorrhoidal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1517-1522.
4. Basdanis G, Papadopoulos VN, Michalopoulos A, et al. Randomized clinical trial of stapled hemorrhoidectomy vs open with Ligasure for prolapsed piles. Surg Endosc. 2005;9: 235-239.
5. Chen S, Lai DM, Yang B, et al. Therapeutic comparison between procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids and Ligasure technique for hemorrhoids. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2007;10:342-345, Chinese.
6. Sakr MF, Moussa MM. LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy versus stapled hemorrhoidopexy: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:1161-1167.
7. Arslani N, Patrlj L, Rajković Z, et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing Ligasure versus stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22:58-61.
8. Fleshman J. Advanced technology in the management of hemorrhoids: stapling, laser, harmonic scalpel, and Ligasure. J Gastrointest Surg. 2002;6:299-301.
9. Khanna R, Khanna S, Bhadani S, et al. Comparison of Ligasure hemorrhoidectomy with conventional Ferguson's hemorrhoidectomy. Indian J Surg. 2010;72:294-297.
10. Tan EK, Cornish J, Darzi AW, et al. Meta-analysis of shortterm outcomes of randomized controlled trials of LigaSure vs conventional hemorrhoidectomy. Arch Surg. 2007;142: 1209-1218; discussion 1218.
11. Nienhuijs S, de Hingh I. Conventional versus LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy for patients with symptomatic Hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;21:CD006761.
12. Gentile M, De Rosa M, Pilone V, et al. Surgical treatment for IV-degree hemorrhoids: LigaSuret hemorrhoidectomy vs. conventional diathermy: a prospective, randomized trial. Minerva Chir. 2011;66:207-213.
13. Franceschilli L, Stolfi VM, D' Ugo S, et al. Radiofrequency versus conventional diathermy Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26:1345-1350.
14. Castellví J, Sueiras A, Espinosa J, et al. Ligasure versus diathermy hemorrhoidectomy under spinal anesthesia or pudendal block with ropivacaine: a randomized prospective clinical study with 1-year follow-up. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009; 24:1011-1018.