Interactional expertise: A pluralistic approach

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A

Volumn 47, Issue , 2014, Pages 60-68

  Plaisance, Kathryn S ^a   Kennedy, Eric B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Diversity; Interactional expertise; Pluralism; Social epistemology; Studies of expertise and experience (SEE)

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905408106     PISSN: 00393681     EISSN: 18792510     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2014.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Carolan M.S. Sustainable agriculture, science and the co-production of 'expert' knowledge: The value of interactional expertise. Local Environment 2006, 11(4):421-431.
2. Code L.B. Is the sex of the knower epistemologically significant?. Metaphilosophy 1981, 12(3-4):267-276. 10.1111/j.1467-9973.1981.tb00760.x.
3. Collins H. Interactional expertise as a third kind of knowledge. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2004, 3(2):125-143. 10.1023/B:PHEN.0000040824.89221.1a.
4. Collins H. Language and practice. Social Studies of Science 2011, 41(2):271-300. 10.1177/0306312711399665.
5. Collins H., Evans R. The third wave of Science Studies Studies of Expertise and Experience. Social Studies of Science 2002, 32(2):235-296. 10.1177/0306312702032002003.
6. Collins H., Evans R. Rethinking expertise 2007, University Of Chicago Press, Chicago. 1st ed.
7. Collins H., Evans R., Ribeiro R., Hall M. Experiments with interactional expertise. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 2006, 37(4):656-674. 10.1016/j.shpsa.2006.09.005.
8. Epstein S. The construction of lay expertise: AIDS activism and the forging of credibility in the reform of clinical trials. Science, Technology & Human Values 1995, 20(4):408-437. 10.1177/016224399502000402.
9. Gorman M. Conclusion: Future research on trading zones and interactional expertise. Trading zones and interactional expertise: Creating new kinds of collaboration 2010, 289-296. MIT Press, Cambridge. M.E. Gorman (Ed.).
10. Grasswick H. Scientific and lay communities: Earning epistemic trust through knowledge sharing. Synthese 2010, 177(3):387-409. 10.1007/s11229-010-9789-0.
11. Grasswick H. Feminist social epistemology. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy 2013, (Spring 2013). Retrieved from. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/feminist-social-epistemology/, E.N. Zalta (Ed.).
12. Jenkins L.D. Bycatch: Interactional expertise, dolphins and the US tuna fishery. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 2007, 38(4):698-712. 10.1016/j.shpsa.2007.09.005.
13. Kennedy, E. B. Why they've immersed: A framework for understanding and attending to motivational differences among interactional experts. Manuscript in preparation.
14. Kennedy, E.B., & Plaisance, K. The Evolution and Application of 'Interactional Expertise'. Manuscript in preparation.
15. Longino H.E. Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry 1990, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
16. Longino H.E. Subjects, power, and knowledge: Description and prescription in feminist philosophies of science. Feminist Epistemologies 1993, 101-120. Routledge Press, New York. L. Alcoff, E. Potter (Eds.).
17. Longino H.E. The fate of knowledge 2002, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
18. Page S.E. The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies 2008, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
19. Plaisance, K. S. How interactional experts can make knowledge more objective. Manuscript in preparation (a).
20. Plaisance, K. S. The benefits of interactional expertise: A case study of philosophy of behavioral genetics. Manuscript in preparation (b).
21. Scheman N. Epistemology resuscitated: Objectivity as trustworthiness. (En)gendering rationalities 2001, 23-52. SUNY Press, Albany, NY. S. Morgen, N. Tuana (Eds.).
22. Selinger E., Mix J. On interactional expertise: Pragmatic and ontological considerations. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2004, 3(2):145-163. 10.1023/B:PHEN.0000040825.60925.a4.
23. Whyte K.P., Crease R.P. Trust, expertise, and the philosophy of science. Synthese 2010, 177(3):411-425. 10.1007/s11229-010-9786-3.
24. Wylie A. Why standpoint matters. Science and other cultures: Issues in philosophies of science and technology 2003, 26-48. Routledge, New York, NY. R. Figueroa, S.G. Harding (Eds.).
25. Wynne B. Sheepfarming after Chernobyl: A case study in communicating scientific information. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 1989, 31(2):10-39. 10.1080/00139157.1989.9928930.