On interactional expertise: Pragmatic and ontological considerations

Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 145-163

  Selinger, Evan ^a   Mix, John ^a  

^a ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Embodiment; Expertise; Science and technology studies

Indexed keywords

EID: 24644438177     PISSN: 15687759     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:PHEN.0000040825.60925.a4     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Collins, H. M. 1990. Artificial Experts: Social Knowledge and Intelligent Machines. Cambridge: MIT Press.
2. Collins, H. M. 1992. Dreyfus, forms of life, and a simple test for machine intelligence. Social Studies of Science 22: 726-739.
3. Collins, H. M. 1996. Embedded or embodied? A review of Hubert Dreyfus' What Computers Still Can't Do. Artificial Intelligence 80: 99-117.
4. Collins, H. M. 2000. Four kinds of knowledge, two (or maybe three) kinds of embodiment, and the question of artificial intelligence. In: M. Wrathall and J. Malpas (eds). Heidegger, Coping and Cognitive Science: Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus, vol. 2, pp. 179-195. Cambridge: MIT Press.
5. Collins, H. M. Interactional expertise as a third kind of knowledge. Phenomenology and Cognitive Science 3: 125-143 (this issue).
6. Collins, H. M. and Evans, R. 2002. The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science 32: 235-296.
7. Collins, H. M. and Kusch, M. 1998. The Shape of Actions: What Humans and Machines Can Do. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
8. Collins, H. M. and Yearley, S. 1992. Epistemological chicken. In: A. Pickering (ed), Science as Practice and Culture, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Collier, J. 2002. Holism and emergence: dynamical complexity beats laplace's demon. http://www.nu.ac.za/undphil/collier/papers/Vienna-Laplace.PDF.
10. Dreyfus, H. 1992a. What Computers Still Can't Do. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
11. Dreyfus, H. 1992b. Response to Collins, Artificial Experts. Social Studies of Science 22: 717-726.
12. Dreyfus, H. 2000a. Response to Carmen Taylor. In: M. Wrathall and J. Malpas (eds), Heidegger, Authenticity, and Modernity: Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus, vol. 1, pp. 306-312. Cambridge: MIT Press.
13. Dreyfus, H. 2000b. Response to Collins. In: M. Wrathall and J. Malpas (eds), Heidegger, Coping and Cognitive Science: Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus, vol. 2, pp. 345-346. Cambridge: MIT Press.
14. Dreyfus, H. 2001.On the Internet. NewYork: Routledge.
15. Dreyfus, H. and Dreyfus, S. 1986. Mind Over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer. New York: Free Press.
16. Dreyfus, H., Spinosa, C. and Flores, F. 1997. Disclosing New Worlds: Entrepreneurship, Demo-cratic Action, and the Cultivation of Solidarity. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
17. Epstein, S. 2000. Democracy, expertise, and AIDS treatment activism. In: D. Kleinman (ed), Science, Technology, and Democracy, pp. 15-32. New York: SUNY Press.
18. Sacks, O. 1998. The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat and Other Clinical Tales. New York: Simon and Schuster.
19. Sanders, J. 1997. An ontology of affordances. Ecological Psychology 9(1): 97-112.
20. Selinger, E. 2003a. Feyerabend's democratic argument against experts. Critical Review 15(3-4): 359-373.
21. Selinger, E. 2003b. Expertise and public ignorance. Critical Review 15(3-4): 375-385.
22. Selinger, E. 2003c. The necessity of embodiment: The Dreyfus-Collins debate. Philosophy Today 57(3): 266-279.
23. Selinger, E. and Crease, R. 2002. Dreyfus on expertise: The limits of phenomenological analysis. Continental Philosophy Review 35: 245-279.
24. Texas Education Agency. Nd. Skin diseases and disorders. Health Science Technology Cur-riculum. (http://www.texashste.com/html/ap inte.htm), April 6 2004.
25. Thompson, E. 2001. Empathy and consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8(5-7): 1-32.
26. Todes, S. 2001. Body and World. Massachusetts: MIT Press.