Responsible innovation and stakeholder management in infrastructures: The Nansha Port Railway Project

Ocean and Coastal Management

Volumn 100, Issue , 2014, Pages 1-9

  Ravesteijn, Wim ^a   He, Jia ^a,b   Chen, Chaohe ^c  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b Jiangsu Environmental Protection Group Co Ltd   (China)

^c SOUTH CHINA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; RAILROADS;

GUANGZHOU; INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT; INNOVATION PROCESS; PORT INFRASTRUCTURE; RAILWAY PROJECT; STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT; STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS;

RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION;

DECISION MAKING; INNOVATION; PORT DEVELOPMENT; PROJECT ASSESSMENT; STAKEHOLDER;

CHINA; GUANGDONG; GUANGZHOU; PACIFIC OCEAN; SOUTH CHINA SEA; SPRATLY ISLANDS;

EID: 84905402663     PISSN: 09645691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Alagappa M. Civil Society and Political Change in Asia: Expanding and Contracting Democratic Space 2004, Stanford University Press, Redwood City, CA.
2. Alexander D. Investing in Britain's Future 2013, Speech by Chief Secretary to the Treasury in Parliament.
3. Bajor T., Erdosi F. Alternative Routes between the Far East and Europe (With Special Regard to the Foreign Trade of Hungary) 2013, Institute for Regional Studies, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Discussion Papers, No. 92.
4. Brown B.B. Delphi Process: a Methodology Used for the Elicitation of Opinions of Experts 1968, RAND, Document No: P-3925, p. 15.
5. China Railway Siyuan Survey and Design Group CO Guangzhou Nansha Port Railway Environment Evaluation Report 2013.
6. Cuppen E. Putting Perspectives into Participation: Constructive Conflict Methodology for Problem Structuring in Stakeholder Dialogues 2010, Dissertation, VU University Amsterdam.
7. Dalkey N., Helmer O. An Experimental application of the Delphi Method to the use of experts. Manag. Sci. 1963, 9(3):458-467.
8. De Bruijn H., Ten Heuvelhof E. Management in Networks: on Multi-actor Decision Making 2008, Routledge, London, New York.
9. Dekker S. Quality Control Round TableMV2 2013, http://annualreport.portofrotterdam.com/en/stakeholders/sybilla-dekker/2219?paragraaf=2228.
10. Dix J. Better Scope Management during the Initiative, Design and Construction Phase of Infrastructure Projects 2010, TU Delft, Master thesis.
11. Dooms M., Verbeke A. Stakeholder management and path dependence in large-scale transport infrastructure development: the port of Antwerp case (1960-2010). J.Transp. Geogr. 2013, 27:14-25.
12. Ducruet C., Lee S.W., Ng K.Y.A. Centrality and vulnerability in liner shipping networks: revisiting the Northeast Asian port hierarchy. Marit. Policy Manag. 2010, 37(1):17-36.
13. Enserink B., Kwakkel J., Thissen W., Koppenjan J., Bots P. Policy Analysis of Multi-actor Systems 2010, Boom Lemma uitgevers, The Hague.
14. Franks D.M., Vanclay F. Social impact management plans: innovation in corporate and public policy. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2013, 43:40-48.
15. Grigalunas T.A., Luo M., Chang Y. Comprehensive Framework for Sustainable Container Port Development for the United States East Coast 2001, Year One Final Report. URI-TC Project, No. Grant 536106.
16. Guangzhou Port Authority 2011 Annual Working Report of Guangzhou Port Authority 2012.
17. Guangzhou Port Authority 2012 Annual Working Report of Guangzhou Port Authority 2013.
18. Hempe E.-M., Morrison C., Holland A. Exploring the boundary of a specialist service for adults with intellectual disabilities using a Delphi study: a quantification of stakeholder participation. Health Expect. 2013, 10.1111/hex.12107.
19. Hlača B., Rudić D., Hirnig S. Rail transport: an important factor in the Port of Rijeka development. Promet - Traffic & Transport. 2010, 22(5):379-388.
20. ICEI, 2014. http://www.ei.tbm.tudelft.nl/16thEvIConference.
21. India to Build Two New Ports 2013, http://www.portfinanceinternational.com/categories/regulation-policy/item/754-india-to-build-two-new-ports.
22. Koetse M.J., Rouwendal J. Rail investment and port competition: a case study for the Betuweroute. Eur. Transp. 2010, 44:57-75.
23. Leal Matamala E., Pérez Salas G. Port-rail integration: challenges and opportunities for Latin America. FAL Bull. 2012, 310(7).
24. Lichtenberg J.J.N. Maak innovatie hsl en Betuwelijn transparant. Cobouw 2005, January 25.
25. Merk O., Theo Notteboom T. The Competitiveness of Global Port-cities 2013, OECD Publishing, Paris.
26. Mulder K., Ferrer D., Van Lente H. What is Sustainable Technology? Perceptions, Paradoxes and Possibilities 2011, Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield.
27. National Port Management Office [[U+56FD][U+5BB6][U+6E2F][U+53E3][U+529E][U+516C][U+5BA4]] National Port Development Plan 2011-2015 2011.
28. Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society 2013, Wiley, Chichester. R. Owen, J. Bessant, M. Heintz (Eds.).
29. Pan K., Cao Y., Liang S., Wei H. New tendency of Chinese container port system: 1998-2010. GeoJournal 2014, 79(3):373-384.
30. Parkhill K., Pidgeon N., Corner A., Vaughan N. Deliberation and responsible innovation: a geoengineering case study. Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society 2013, Wiley, Chichester. R. Owen, J. Bessant, M. Heintz (Eds.).
31. Pesch U., Ravesteijn W. Maasvlakte 2: a laboratory for sustainable innovation. Paper for the 2nd Annual Responsible Innovation Conference, "Making Values Matter", 13-14 December, The Hague 2012.
32. Porras I.M. The Rio Declaration: a New Basis for International Co-operation 1992, Wiley Online Library.
33. Quist J. Backcasting for a Sustainable Future 2007, Dissertation, TU Delft.
34. Rajsman M., Horvat R. Public urban passenger transport as important factor in the development of cities. J.Traffic Logist. Eng. 2014, 2(3):172-175.
35. Rotterdam Mainport Development Project 2014, http://https://www.maasvlakte2.com/en/index/show/id/618/Rotterdam+Mainport+development.
36. Sager T. Cost-benefit analysis in participatory planning: deliberative theory coming to use. Paper for the 26th AESOP Congress, Ankara, July 11-15 2012.
37. Simakova E., Coenen C. Visions, hype, and expectations: a place for responsibility. Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society 2013, 241-268. Wiley, Chichester. R. Owen, J. Bessant, M. Heintz (Eds.).
38. Smit W.A., Van Oost E.C.J. De wederzijdse beïnvloeding van technologie en maatschappij 1999, Een technology assessment-benadering, Coutinho, Bussem.
39. Song X., Mulder K., Frostell B., Ravesteijn W., Wennersten R. Transition in public participation in Chinese water management. Eng. Sustain. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. 2011, 164(ES1):71-83.
40. Timberlake M., Wei Y.D., Mac X., Haoa J. Global cities with Chinese characteristics. Cities 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.02.009.
41. Top 50 World Container Ports 2013, http://www.worldshipping.org/about-the-industry/global-trade/top-50-world-container-ports.
42. Van de Poel I., Royakkers L. Ethics, Technology, and Engineering: an Introduction 2011, Wiley, Chichester.
43. Van den Hoven J., Wildschut E., Bakker E. Responsible innovation at port cities. Boll. del Dipartimento Conserv. dei Beni Archit. Ambient. 2012, 12(1):765-770.
44. Van den Hoven J., Jacob K., Nielsen L., Roure F., Rudze L., Stilgoe J. Options for Strengthening Responsible Research and Innovation 2013, European Commission.
45. Williams A. The Commodities Boom - the Effect on Port Infrastructure 2012, Port Strategy, January/February.
46. World Commission on Environment and Development Our Common Future. United Nations 1987, Brundtland Report.
47. Zhao J., Zhang W. The investigation of "Shatian Event" in Beihai, Guangxi Province. China Economic Weekly June 24, 2013, 56-58.