Rail investment and port competition: A case study for the Betuweroute

European Transport - Trasporti Europei

Volumn , Issue 44, 2010, Pages 57-75

  Koetse, Mark J ^a   Rouwendal, Jan ^b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b TINBERGEN INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Betuweroute; Port competition; Rail investment; Transport pricing

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960570043     PISSN: 18253997     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Algemene Rekenkamer (2000) Beleidsinformatie Betuweroute (Policy Information Betuweroute, in Dutch), Den Haag.
2. CPB (1993) De Macro-Economische Effecten van de Betuweroute (The Macroeconomic Effects of the Betuweroute, in Dutch), Werkdocument 52, The Hague, The Netherlands.
3. CPB (1995) Economische Effecten van de Betuweroute op Basis van Recente Informatie (Economic Effects of the Betuweroute Based on Recent Information, in Dutch), Werkdocument 75, The Hague, The Netherlands.
4. De Palma, A., Proost, S. and Van der Loo, S. (2010) Assessing Transport Investments - Towards a Multi-Purpose Tool, Transportation Research B, available online 13 January 2010, doi:10.1016/j.trb.2009.12.006.
5. European Commission (2005) Trans-European Transport Network: TEN-T Priority Axis and Projects 2005, Brussels.
6. Farrell, S. (1999) Financing European Transport Infrastructure, MacMillan, London.
7. Haralambides, H.E. (2002) Competition, Excess Capacity, and the Pricing of Port Infrastructure, International Journal of Maritime Economics 4: 323-347.
8. Knight Wendling (1991) Evaluatie van de Betuwe Goederenspoorlijn: Kernpunten (Evaluation of the Betuwe Freight Railway: Core Issues, in Dutch), Amsterdam.
9. Knight Wendling (1992) Macro Economische en Maatschappelijke Kosten-Baten Analyse van de Betuwe Route (Macro Economic and Social Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Betuwe Route, in Dutch), Amsterdam.
10. Koetse, M.J. and Rouwendal, J. (2008) Transport and Welfare Consequences of Infrastructure Investment: A Case Study for the Betuweroute, Task report Deliverable 5, Funding Infrastructure:Guidelines for Europe - FUNDING, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
11. Meersman H., Voorde E. and Vanelslander T. (2002), Port Pricing Issues, paper presented at the second seminar of the IMPRINT-Europe Thematic Network, Antwerp.
12. NEA, STERC, TRANSCARE (2005) Vergelijkingskader Modaliteiten, Versie 1.4 (Comparison Framework for Freight Modes, Version 1.4, in Dutch), NEA Transport Research and Training, Rijswijk, The Netherlands.
13. Nellthorp J., Sansom T., Bickel P., Doll C. and Lindberg G. (2001), Valuation Conventions for UNITE, UNITE Deliverable 2, Funded by 5th Framework RTD Programme, ITS, University of Leeds, Leeds.
14. NS, Prorail (2006) Netwerkanalyse Spoor (Network Analysis Rail Infrastructure, in Dutch), NS/Prorail, Den Haag.
15. Smith, W.S., Hall, F.L., Montgomery, F.O. (1996), Comparing the Speed-Flow Relationship for Motorways with New Data from the M6, Transportation Research A 30: 89-101.
16. TCI, (2004) Onderzoek naar Infrastructuurprojecten: Reconstructie Betuweroute (Research on Infrastructure Projects: Reconstruction Betuweroute, in Dutch), Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal, Den Haag.
17. Van Wee, G.P., Thomas, R., Dunnewold, W., and van den Heuvel, M. (1994) Effecten van de Betuweroute op NOx en CO2 Emissie's (Impact of the Betuwe-line on NOx and CO2 Emissions, in Dutch), RIVM Rapport 251701015, National Institute for Public health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.