Incorporation of directivity effect in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and disaggregation of Tabriz city

Natural Hazards

Volumn 73, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 277-301

  Yousefi, Masood ^a   Taghikhany, Touraj ^a  

^a AMIRKABIR UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Disaggregation; Near field; Probability seismic hazard analysis; Pulse; Tabriz city

Indexed keywords

GROUND MOTION; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; MAPPING; PROBABILITY; SEISMIC HAZARD;

EAST AZERBAIJAN; IRAN; TABRIZ;

EID: 84905396190     PISSN: 0921030X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-014-1096-5     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abrahamson NA (2000) Effects of rupture directivity on probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Paper presented at the sixth international conference seismic zonation, Oakland, California.
2. Akkar S, Yazgan U, Gulkan P (2005) Drift estimates in frame buildings subjected to near-fault ground motions. Struct Eng 131: 1014-1024.
3. Ambraseys NN, Melville CP (1982) A history of Persian earthquakes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
4. Anderson JC, Bertero V (1987) Uncertainties in establishing design earthquakes. Struct Eng 113: 1709-1724.
5. Bazzurro P, Cornell CA (1999) Disaggregation of seismic hazard. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89: 501-520.
6. Bender B, Perkins DM (1987) SEISRISK III: a computer program for seismic hazard estimation 48.
7. Boore MD, Atkinson MG (2008) Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5 %-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0. 01 and 10. 0 s. Earthq Spectra 24: 99-138.
8. Bozorgnia Y, Campbell KW (2003) The vertical-to-horizontal response spectral ratio and tentative procedures for developing simplified V/H and vertical design spectra. Earthq Eng 8: 175-207.
9. Chioccarelli E, Iervolino I (2012) Near-source seismic hazard and design scenarios. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 42(4): 603-622.
10. Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58: 1583-1606.
11. Gardner JK, Knopoff L (1974) Is the sequence earthquakes in southern California, with aftershocks removed, poissonian? Bull Seismol Soc Am 64: 1363-1367.
12. Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1954) Seismicity of the earth and associated phenomena. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
13. Hessami K, Pantosti D, Tabassi H, Shabanian E, Abbassi M, Feghhi K, Solaymani S (2003) Paleoearthquakes and slip rates of the North-Tabriz fault, NW Iran: preliminary results. Ann Geophys 46: 903-915.
14. Iervolino I, Cornell CA (2008) Probability of occurrence of velocity pulses in near-source ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98: 2262-2277.
15. Iervolino I, Chioccarelli E, Convertito V (2011) Engineering design earthquakes from multimodal hazard disaggregation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31: 1212-1231.
16. Jackson J (1992) Partitioning of strike-slip and convergent motion between Eurasia and Arabia in Eastern Turkey and the Caucasus. Geophys Res 97: 12471-12479.
17. Kijko A, Sellevoll MA (1992) Estimation of earthquake hazard parameters from incomplete data files. Part II, incorporation of magnitude heterogeneity. Bull Seismol Soc Am 82: 120-134.
18. Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
19. Luco N, Cornell CA (2007) Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions. Earthq Spectra 23: 357-392.
20. Mavroeidis GP, Dong G, Papageorgiou AS (2004) Near-fault ground motions, and the response of elastic and inelastic single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 33: 1023-1049.
21. McGuire RK (1995) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and design earthquakes: closing the loop. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85: 1275-1284.
22. McGuire RK (2004) Seismic hazard and risk analysis. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley.
23. Mohajer-Ashjaee A, Nowroozi A (1978) Observed and probable intensity zoning of Iran. Tectonophysics 49: 149-160.
24. Nowroozi A (1985) Empirical relations between magnitudes and fault parameters for earthquakes in Iran. Bull Seismol Soc Am 75: 1327-1338.
25. Shahi KS, Baker JW (2011) An empirically calibrated framework for including the effects of near-fault directivity in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101: 742-755.
26. Shoja-Taheri J, Naserieh S, Hadi G (2010) A test of the applicability of NGA models to the strong ground-motion data in the Iranian plateau. Earthq Eng 14: 278-292.
27. Somerville PG (2003) Magnitude scaling of the near fault rupture directivity pulse. Phys Earth Planet 137: 201-212.
28. Somerville PG (2005) Engineering characterization of near fault ground motion. Paper presented at the New Zealand society for earthquake engineering conference, Taupo, New Zealand.
29. Somerville PG, Smith NF, Graves RW, Abrahamson NA (1997) Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity. Seismol Res Lett 68: 199-222.
30. Spudich P, Chiou BSJ (2008) Directivity in NGA earthquake ground motions: analysis using isochrone theory. Earthq Spectra 24: 279-298.
31. Tothong P, Cornell CA, Baker JW (2007) Explicit-directivity-pulse inclusion in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Earthq Spectra 23: 867-891.
32. Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84: 974-1002.
33. Zare M (2001) The risk of construction in neighborhood of North Tabriz Fault and seismic active faults across Iran. Earthq Eng Seismol Bull-Persian 4(2): 46-57.
34. Zare M, Sabzali S (2006) Spectral attenuation of strong motions in Iran. In: Proceedings, third international symposium on the effects of surface geology on seismic motion vol 1, pp 749-758.