Threats to objectivity in peer review: The case of gender

Trends in Pharmacological Sciences

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 371-373

  Kaatz, Anna ^a   Gutierrez, Belinda ^a,b   Carnes, Molly ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b WILLIAM S MIDDLETON MEMORIAL VETERANS HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVEMENT; ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; GENDER BIAS; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEXISM; STEREOTYPY;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PEER REVIEW; SEXISM; STEREOTYPING;

EID: 84905393243     PISSN: 01656147     EISSN: 18733735     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tips.2014.06.005     Document Type: Note

References (18)

1. M. Biernat Stereotypes and shifting standards: forming, communicating and translating person impressions P. Devine, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 2012 Academic Press 1 50
2. B.A. Nosek et al. Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 18 2007 36 88
3. C.A. Moss-Racusin et al. Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109 2012 16474 16479
4. M.E. Heilman, and M.C. Haynes Subjectivity in the appraisal process: a facilitator of gender bias in work settings E. Borgida, S.T. Fiske, Beyond Common Sense: Psychological Science in the Courtroom 2008 Blackwell Publishing 127 155
5. M. Biernat, and T.K. Vescio She swings, she hits, she's great, she's benched: implications of gender-based shifting standards for judgment and behavior Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 28 2002 66 77
6. A.H. Eagly, and S.J. Karau Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders Psychol. Rev. 109 2002 573 598
7. A.H. Eagly et al. Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: a meta-analysis comparing women and men Psychol. Bull. 129 2003 569 591
8. C. Isaac et al. Interventions that affect gender bias in hiring: a systematic review Acad. Med. 84 2009 1440 1446
9. P. Goldberg Are women prejudiced against women? Transaction 5 1968 316 322
10. M.R. Nakhaie Gender differences in publication among university professors in Canada Can. Rev. Sociol. Anthropol. 39 2002 151 179
11. M.R.E. Symonds et al. Gender differences in publication output: towards an unbiased metric of research performance PLoS ONE 1 2006 e127
12. C. Wenneras, and A. Wold Nepotism and sexism in peer-review Nature 387 1997 341
13. NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORT); NIH Data Book
14. T.J. Ley, and B.H. Hamilton The gender gap in NIH grant applications Science 322 2008 1472 1474
15. J.R. Pohlhaus et al. Sex differences in application, success, and funding rates for NIH extramural programs Acad. Med. 86 2011 759 767
16. A. Kaatz et al. A quantitative linguistic analysis of NIH R01 application critiques from investigators at one institution Acad. Med. 2014 (in press)
17. V. Demicheli, and C. Di Pietrantonj Peer review for improving the quality of grant applications Cochrane Database of Syst. Rev. 2007 2007 MR000003
18. M. Carnes et al. Promoting institutional change through bias literacy J. Divers. High. Educ. 5 2012 63 77