Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the literature: A re-analysis

Energy Policy

Volumn 73, Issue , 2014, Pages 701-705

  Tol, Richard S J ^a,b,c,d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES   (Netherlands)

^c VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d TINBERGEN INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

^e CESIFO   (Germany)

Author keywords

Climate change; Consensus; Replication

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; ENERGY POLICY; GLOBAL WARMING;

ANTHROPOGENIC CLIMATE CHANGES; ANTHROPOGENIC GLOBAL WARMING; CLIMATE POLICY; CONSENSUS; IN COMPOSITIONS; REPLICATION; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; VALIDATION TEST;

GLOBAL WARMING; CLIMATE CHANGE;

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; CLIMATE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GLOBAL WARMING; LITERATURE REVIEW; MODEL VALIDATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

EID: 84905262870     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.045     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Anderegg W.R.L., Prall J.W., Harold J. Reply to O'Neill and Boykoff: objective classification of climate experts. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:39.
2. Anderegg W.R.L., Prall J.W., Harold J., Schneider S.H. Expert credibility in climate change. Proc. Nat Acad Sci U.S.A. 2010, 107(27):12107-12109.
3. Andrews T., Gregory J.M., Webb M.J., Taylor K.E. Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere-ocean climate models. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2012, 39:9.
4. Annan J.D., Hargreaves J.C. On the generation and interpretation of probabilistic estimates of climate sensitivity. Clim. Change 2011, 104(3-4):423-436.
5. Bray D. The scientifc consensus of climate change revisited. Environ. Sci. Policy 2010, 13(5):340-350.
6. Cook J., Nuccitelli D., Green S.A., Richardson M., Winkler B., Painting R., Way R., Jacobs P., Skuce A. Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environ. Res. Lett. 2013, 8:024024.
7. Doran P.T., Zimmerman M.K. Examining the scientific consensus on climate change. EOS 2009, 90(3):22-23.
8. Grundmann R. Climate change and knowledge politics. Environ. Polit. 2007, 16(3):414-432.
9. Hegerl G.C., Zwiers F.W., Braconnot P., Gillett N.P., Luo Y., Marengo Orsini J.A., Nicholls N., Penner J.E., Stott P.A. Understanding and attributing climate change. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis-Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007, 663-745. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. S. Solomon (Ed.).
10. Legates D.R., Soon W., Briggs W.M. Monckton of Brenchley. Climate consensus and misinformation: a rejoinder to agnotology, scientific consensus, and the teaching and learning of climate change. Sci. Educ. 2013, (Ref Type: In Press.).
11. Lyberg L.E., Biemer P.P. Quality assurance and quality control in surveys. International Handbook of Survey Methodology 2008, Psychology Press, Abingdon. E.D. de Leeuws, J.J. Hox, D. Dillman (Eds.).
12. Mohler P.P., Pennell B.-E., Hubbard F. Survey documentation: toward professional knowledge management in sample surveys. International Handbook of Survey Methodology 2008, Psychology Press, Abingdon. E.D. de Leeuws, J.J. Hox, D. Dillman (Eds.).
13. Montford A.W. Consensus? What Consensus? 2013, Global Warming Policy Foundation, London.
14. O'Neill S.J., Boykoff M. Climate denier, skeptic, or contrarian?. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:39.
15. Oreskes N. Beyond the ivory tower: the scientific consensus on climatic change. Science 2004, 306(5702):1686.
16. Poortinga W., Spence A., Whitmarsh L., Capstick S., Pidgeon N.F. Uncertain climate: an investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change. Global Environ. Change 2011, 21(3):1015-1024.
17. Randall D.A., Wood R.A., Bony S., Colman R., Fichefet T., Fyfe J., Kattsov V., Pitman A., Shukla J., Srinivasan J., Stouffer R.J., Sumi A., Taylor K.E. Climate models and their evaluation. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis-Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007, 589-662. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. S. Solomon (Ed.).
18. Reusswig F. History and future of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming. Environ. Res. Lett. 2013, 8:031003.
19. Rohling E.J., Sluijs A., Dijkstra H.A., Koehler P., van de Wal R.S.W., Von Der Heydt A.S., Beerling D.J., Berger A., Bijl P.K., Crucifix M., Deconto R., Drijfhout S.S., Fedorov A., Foster G.L., Ganopolski A., Hansen J., Haenisch B., Hooghiemstra H., Huber M., Huybers P., Knutti R., Lea D.W., Lourens L.J., Lunt D., Masson-Demotte V., Medina-Elizalde M., Otto-Bliesner B., Pagani M., Pälike H., Renssen H., Royer D.L., Siddall M., Valdes P., Zachos J.C., Zeebe R.E. Making sense of palaeoclimate sensitivity. Nature 2012, 491(7426):683-691.
20. Rosenberg S., Vedlitz A., Cowman D.F., Zahran S. Climate change: a profile of US climate scientists' perspectives. Clim. Change 2010, 101(3):311-329.
21. Schulte K.M. Scientific consensus on climate change?. Energy Environ. 2008, 19(2):281-286.
22. Singer E. Ethical issues in surveys. International Handbook of Survey Methodology 2008, Psychology Press, Abingdon. E.D. de Leeuws, J.J. Hox, D. Dillman (Eds.).