Reply to O'Neill and Boykoff: Objective classification of climate experts

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 107, Issue 39, 2010, Pages

  Anderegg, William R L ^a   Prall, James W ^b   Harold, Jacob ^c  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOLOGY; CLIMATE CHANGE; LETTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS;

EID: 78049261424     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1010824107     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. Anderegg WRL, Prall JW, Harold J, Schneider SH (2010) Expert credibility in climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:12107-12109.
2. O'Neill SJ, Boykoff M (2010) Climate denier, skeptic, or contrarian? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:E151.
3. Diethelm P, McKee M (2009) Denialism: What is it and how should scientists respond? Eur J Public Health 19:2-4.
4. Jacques P, Dunlap R, Freeman M (2008) The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism. Env Polit 17:349-385. (Pubitemid 351911405)
5. Oreskes N, Conway EM (2010) Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming (Bloomsbury, New York).
6. Antilla L (2005) Climate of scepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change. Glob Environ Change 15:338-352. (Pubitemid 41608732)