Point-of-care hemoglobin A1c testing: An evidence-based analysis

Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series

Volumn 14, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1-30

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN A1C; GLYCOSYLATED HEMOGLOBIN; HEMOGLOBIN A1C PROTEIN, HUMAN;

AFFINITY CHROMATOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; BLOOD SAMPLING; CANADA; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIABETES MELLITUS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEMAGGLUTINATION INHIBITION TEST; HEMOGLOBIN ANALYSIS; HEMOGLOBINOMETER; HUMAN; IMMUNOASSAY; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LATEX AGGLUTINATION TEST; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; META ANALYSIS; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PATIENT CARE; POINT OF CARE TESTING; PREVALENCE; STANDARDIZATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; BLOOD;

DIABETES MELLITUS; HEMOGLOBIN A, GLYCOSYLATED; HUMANS; POINT-OF-CARE TESTING;

EID: 84905239607     PISSN: 19157398     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Forbes JM, Cooper ME. Mechanisms of diabetic complications. Physiol Rev. 2013 Jan;93(1):137-88.
2. White NH, Sun W, Cleary PA, Danis RP, Davis MD, Hainsworth DP, et al. Prolonged effect of intensive therapy on the risk of retinopathy complications in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: 10 years after the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 Dec;126(12):1707-15.
3. Albers JW, Herman WH, Pop-Busui R, Feldman EL, Martin CL, Cleary PA, et al. Effect of prior intensive insulin treatment during the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) on peripheral neuropathy in type 1 diabetes during the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) Study. Diabetes Care. 2010 May;33(5):1090-6.
4. Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HA. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 9;359(15):1577-89.
5. Gallagher EJ, Le RD, Bloomgarden Z. Review of hemoglobin A(1c) in the management of diabetes. J Diabetes. 2009 Mar;1(1):9-17.
6. Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee. Canadian Diabetes Association 2013 clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada [Internet]. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Diabetes Association; 2013 [cited 2013 Sep 19]. 212 p. Available from: http://guidelines.diabetes.ca/App_Themes/CDACPG/resources/cpg_2013_full_en.pdf
7. Statistics Canada. Diabetes by sex, provinces and territories [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Government of Canada; 2013 [cited 2013 Sep 19]. Available from: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/health54a-eng.htm
8. Kost GJ. Guidelines for point-of-care testing. Improving patient outcomes. Am J Clin Pathol. 1995 Oct;104(4 Suppl 1):S111-S127.
9. 1c standardisation: history, science and politics. Clin Biochem Rev. 2007 Nov;28(4):163-8.
10. Sacks DB, Arnold M, Bakris GL, Bruns DE, Horvath AR, Kirkman MS, et al. Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. Clin Chem. 2011 Jun;57(6):e1-e47.
11. National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program. NGSP News [Internet]. Missouri: National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program; 2013 [cited 2013 Sep 19]. Available from: http://www.ngsp.org/news.asp
12. National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program. Obtaining certification [Internet]. Missouri: National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program; 2013 [cited 2013 Sep 19]. 7 p. Available from: http://www.ngsp.org/cert/Manufinfo1113.pdf
13. 1c point-of-care instruments do not meet the general accepted analytical performance criteria. Clin Chem. 2010 Jan;56(1):44-52.
14. National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program. Meeting of the National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program Steering Committee minutes [Internet]. Missouri: National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program; 2011 [cited 2013 Sep 19]. 9 p. Available from: http://www.ngsp.org/docs/SC2011.pdf
15. 1c Assay Interferences [Internet]. Missouri: National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program; 2013 [cited 2013 Sep 19]. Available from: http://www.ngsp.org/interf.asp
16. National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program. List of NGSP certified methods [Internet]. Missouri: National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program; 2013 [cited 2013 Sep 19]. 17 p. Available from: http://www.ngsp.org/docs/methods.pdf
17. Cox NJ. Speaking Stata: Correlation with confidence, or Fisher's z revisited [Internet]. Texas: StataCorp LP; 2008 [cited 2013 Sep 19]. Available from: http://www.stata-journal.com/sjpdf.html?articlenum=pr0041
18. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):529-36.
19. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Schunemann HJ, Tugwell P, Knottnerus A. GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):380-2.
20. Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, Brozek J, Glasziou P, Jaeschke R, Vist GE, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ. 2008 May 17;336(7653):1106-10.
21. Arrendale JR, Cherian SE, Zineh I, Chirico MJ, Taylor JR. Assessment of glycated hemoglobin using A1cNow+ point-of-care device as compared to central laboratory testing. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008 Sep;2(5):822-7.
22. Leca V, Ibrahim Z, Lombard-Pontou E, Maraninchi M, Guieu R, Portugal H, et al. Point-of-care measurements of HbA(1c): simplicity does not mean laxity with controls. Diabetes Care. 2012 Dec;35(12):e85.
23. Leal S, Soto-Rowen M. Usefulness of point-of-care testing in the treatment of diabetes in an underserved population. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 Jul;3(4):672-6.
24. 1c determination. Diabetes Metab. 2010 Apr;36(2):158-64.
25. 1c point-of-care analyser Bio-Rad in2it in comparison with the DCA 2000 and central laboratory analysers. Ann Clin Biochem. 2009 Sep;46(Pt 5):373-6.
26. Goodman C. Literature searching and evidence interpretation for assessing health care practices. Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care. 1996. 81 p. SBU Report No. 119E.
27. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10.