Impact of lung cancer screening results on smoking cessation

Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Volumn 106, Issue 6, 2014, Pages

  Tammemägi, Martin C ^a   Berg, Christine D ^b   Riley, Thomas L ^c   Cunningham, Christopher R ^c   Taylor, Kathryn L ^d  

^a BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC   (United States)

^d GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; LUNG CANCER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PASSIVE SMOKING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SMOKING CESSATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; ETHNOLOGY; LUNG TUMOR; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK; SMOKING; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

AGED; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ODDS RATIO; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TOBACCO SMOKE POLLUTION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84905158348     PISSN: 00278874     EISSN: 14602105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju084     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. New Engl J Med. 2011;365(5):395-409.
2. Moyer VA. Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2013. [published ahead of print December 31, 2013].
3. Bach PB, Mirkin JN, Oliver TK, et al. Benefits and harms of CT screening for lung cancer: a systematic review. JAMA. 2012;307(22):2418-2429.
4. Wood DE, Eapen GA, Ettinger DS, et al. Lung cancer screening. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2012;10(2):240-265.
5. Jacobson FL, Austin JH, Field JK, et al. Development of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery guidelines for low-dose computed tomography scans to screen for lung cancer in North America: recommendations of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery Task Force for Lung Cancer Screening and Surveillance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144(1):25-32.
6. Jaklitsch MT, Jacobson FL, Austin JH, et al. The American Association for Thoracic Surgery guidelines for lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography scans for lung cancer survivors and other high-risk groups. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144(1):33-38.
7. Wender R, Fontham ET, Barrera E Jr, et al. American Cancer Society lung cancer screening guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63(2):106-117.
8. McBride CM, Emmons KM, Lipkus IM. Understanding the potential of teachable moments: the case of smoking cessation. Health Educ Res. 2003;18(2):156-170.
9. Ostroff JS, Buckshee N, Mancuso CA, et al. Smoking cessation following CT screening for early detection of lung cancer. Prev Med. 2001;33(6):613-621.
10. Cox LS, Clark MM, Jett JR, et al. Change in smoking status after spiral chest computed tomography scan screening. Cancer. 2003;98(11):2495-2501.
11. Townsend CO, Clark MM, Jett JR, et al. Relation between smoking cessation and receiving results from three annual spiral chest computed tomography scans for lung carcinoma screening. Cancer. 2005;103(10):2154-2162.
12. Taylor KL, Cox LS, Zincke N, et al. Lung cancer screening as a teachable moment for smoking cessation. Lung Cancer. 2007;56(1):125-134.
13. Anderson CM, Yip R, Henschke CI, et al. Smoking cessation and relapse during a lung cancer screening program. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18(12):3476-3483.
14. Ashraf H, Tonnesen P, Holst Pedersen J, et al. Effect of CT screening on smoking habits at 1-year follow-up in the Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial (DLCST). Thorax. 2009;64(5):388-392.
15. van der Aalst CM, van Klaveren RJ, van den Bergh KA, et al. The impact of a lung cancer computed tomography screening result on smoking abstinence. Eur Respir J. 2011;37(6):1466-1473.
16. Shi L, Iguchi MY. "Risk homeostasis"or "teachable moment"? the interaction between smoking behavior and lung cancer screening in the Mayo Lung Project. Tob Induc Dis. 2011;9(1):2.
17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health. How Tobacco Smoke Causes Disease: The Biology and Behavioral Basis for Smoking-Attributable Disease: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2010.
18. United States Public Health Service, Office of the Surgeon General, Office on Smoking and Health. The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service; 2004.
19. Barry SA, Tammemagi MC, Penek S, et al. Predictors of adverse smoking outcomes in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(21):1647-1659.
20. Aberle DR, Berg CD, Black WC, et al. The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. Radiology. 2011;258(1):243-253.
21. Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, et al. Baseline characteristics of participants in the randomized national lung screening trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(23):1771-1779.
22. Harrell FE. Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis. New York: Springer; 2001.
23. Styn MA, Land SR, Perkins KA, et al. Smoking behavior 1 year after computed tomography screening for lung cancer: effect of physician referral for abnormal CT findings. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18(12):3484-3489.
24. Studts JL, Ghate SR, Gill JL, et al. Validity of self-reported smoking status among participants in a lung cancer screening trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(10):1825-1828.
25. McWilliams A, Tammemagi M, Mayo J, et al. Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening computed tomography. New Engl J Med. 2013;369(10):910-919.