Effect of CT screening on smoking habits at 1-year follow-up in the Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial (DLCST)

Thorax

Volumn 64, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 388-392

  Ashraf, H ^a   Tonnesen P ^a   Holst Pedersen, J ^a   Dirksen, A ^a   Thorsen, H ^b   Dossing M ^c  

^a GENTOFTE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c Frederikssund Hospital   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON MONOXIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENMARK; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FORCED EXPIRATORY VOLUME; HUMAN; LUNG CANCER; LUNG FUNCTION TEST; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTIVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RELAPSE; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TOBACCO DEPENDENCE;

EID: 66049110582     PISSN: 00406376     EISSN: 14683296     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/thx.2008.102475     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Sasco AJ, Secretan MB, Straif K. Tobacco smoking and cancer: a brief review of recent epidemiological evidence. Lung Cancer 2004;45:S3-9. (Pubitemid 39488165)
2. Lawrence AL, Virginia LE, Kenneth EW, et al. Smoking and lung cancer: an overview. Cancer Research 1984;44:5940-5958
3. Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF, et al. Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 1999;354:99-105.
4. McMahon PM, Christiani DC. Editorial: Computed tomography screening for lung cancer. Results of randomised trials are needed before recommending its adoption. BMJ 2007;334:271-275
5. Gohagan J, Marcus P, Fagerstrom R, et al. Baseline findings of a randomized feasibility trial of lung cancer screening with spiral CT scan vs chest radiograph. Chest 2004;126:114-121
6. van Klaveren RJ, Habbema JDF, Pedersen JH, et al. Lung cancer screening by low-dose spiral computed tomography. Eur Respir J 2001;18:857-866
7. Iersel CA, de Koning HJ, Draisma G, et al. Risk based selection from the general population in a screening trial: selection criteria, recruitment and power for the Dutch-Belgian randomised lung cancer multi-slice CT screening trial. Int J Cancer 2006;120:868-874
8. Roberts HC, Patsios D, Paul NS, et al. Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography: Canadian experience. Can Assoc Radiol J 2007;58:225-235
9. Taylor KL, Sanderson C, Zinckea Nicole, et al. Lung cancer screening as a teachable moment for smoking cessation. Lung Cancer 2007;56:125-134
10. Ostroff NB, Mancuso CA, Yankelevitz DF, et al. Smoking cessation following CT screening for early detection of lung cancer. Prev Med 2001;33:613-621
11. Townsend CO, Clark MM, Jett JR, et al. Relation between smoking cessation and receiving results from three annual spiral chest computed tomography scans for lung carcinoma screening. Cancer 2005;15:2154-2162
12. TNS Gallup. Monitorering af danskernes rygevaner 2007. http://www.cancer.dk/NR/rdonlyres/75A6C400-146C-4C06-89B0-830F61641B1F/0/ FrekvenstabellerKvinderCATI.pdf (accessed 28 Mar 2008).
13. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, et al. The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict 1991;86:1119-1127
14. Kozlowski LT, Porter CQ, Orleans CT, et al. Predicting smoking cessation with self-reported measures of nicotine dependence: FTQ, FTND, and HSI. Drug Alcohol Depend 1994;34:211-216 (Pubitemid 24091666)
15. Payne TJ, Smith PO, McCracken LM, et al. Assessing nicotine dependence: a comparison of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire (FTQ) with the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) in a clinical sample. Addict Behav 1994;19:307-317
16. Fagerström KO. Towards better diagnoses and more individual treatment of tobacco dependence. Br J Addict 1991;86:543-547
17. Tønnesen P, Mikkelsen K, Markholst C, et al. Nurse-conducted smoking cessation with minimal intervention in a lung clinic: a randomized controlled study. Eur Respir J 1996;9:2351-2355
18. Thyrian JR, Panagiotakos DB, Polychronopoulos E, et al. The relationship between smokers' motivation to quit and intensity of tobacco control at the population level: a comparison of five European countries. BMC Public Health 2008;8:2. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/8/2 (accessed 8 Apr 2008).
19. Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Brusasco V, et al. Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. Eur Respir J 2005;26:948-968
20. Kentala J, Utriainen P, Pahkala K, et al. Verification of adolescent self-reported smoking. Addict Behav 2004;29:405-411
21. Morabia A, Bernstein MS, Curtin F, et al. Validation of self-reported smoking status by simultaneous measurement of carbon monoxide and salivary thiocyanate. Prev Med 2001;32:82-88
22. Attebring M, Herlitz J, Berndt AK, et al. Are patients truthful about their smoking habits? A validation of self-report about smoking cessation with biochemical markers of smoking activity amongst patients with ischaemic heart disease. J Intern Med 2001;249:145-151
23. MacRedmond R, Logan PM, Lee M, et al. Screening for lung cancer using low dose CT scanning. Thorax 2004;59:237-241
24. Nawa T, Nakagawa T, Kusano S, et al. Lung cancer screening using low-dose spiral CT. Chest 2002;122:15-20.
25. Cynthia OT, Matthew MC, James RJ, et al. Relationship between smoking cessation and receiving results from three annual spiral chest computed tomography scans for lung carcinoma screening. Cancer 2005;103:2154-2162
26. Nakamura H, Haruki T, Adachi Y, et al. Smoking affects prognosis after lung cancer surgery. Surg Today 2008;38:227-231
27. Bach PB, Jett JR, Pastorino U, et al. Computed tomography screening and lung cancer outcomes. JAMA 2007;297:953-961
28. Quantin X, Stoebner-Delbarre A, Guichenez P. Smoking cessation in patients with lung cancer. Rev Mal Respir 2007;24:16-21.
29. Cooley ME, Sipples RL, Murphy M, et al. Smoking cessation and lung cancer: oncology nurses can make a difference. Semin Oncol Nurs 2008;24:16-26.