Crowdsourcing algorithms for entity resolution

Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment

Volumn 7, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 1071-1082

  Vesdapunt, Norases ^a   Bellare, Kedar ^b   Dalvi, Nilesh ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FACEBOOK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENTITY RESOLUTIONS; EQUALITY RELATIONS; HUMAN-MACHINE; ON-MACHINES; OPTIMAL STRATEGIES; PRODUCTION SYSTEM; THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK; THEORETICAL GUARANTEES;

CROWDSOURCING;

EID: 84905112588     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21508097     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.14778/2732977.2732982     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. http://www.facebook.com/places/editor.
2. http://www.facebook.com/about/location.
3. http://dbs.uni-leipzig.de/file/Abt-Buy.zip.
4. N. Bansal, A. Blum, and S. Chawla. Correlation clustering. In MACHINE LEARNING, pages 238-247, 2002.
5. M. Bilgic and L. Getoor. Active inference for collective classification. In Twenty-Fourth Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI NECTAR Track), pages 1652-1655, 2010.
6. N. N. Dalvi, A. Dasgupta, R. Kumar, and V. Rastogi. Aggregating crowdsourced binary ratings. In D. Schwabe, V. A. F. Almeida, H. Glaser, R. A. Baeza-Yates, and S. B. Moon, editors, WWW, pages 285-294. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee / ACM, 2013.
7. G. Demartini, D. E. Difallah, and P. Cudré-Mauroux. Zencrowd: leveraging probabilistic reasoning and crowdsourcing techniques for large-scale entity linking. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web, WWW '12, pages 469-478, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM.
8. M. Georgescu, D. D. Pham, C. S. Firan, W. Nejdl, and J. Gaugaz. Map to humans and reduce error: crowdsourcing for deduplication applied to digital libraries. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, CIKM '12, pages 1970-1974, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM.
9. A. Ghosh, S. Kale, and P. McAfee. Who moderates the moderators?: crowdsourcing abuse detection in user-generated content. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM conference on Electronic commerce, EC '11, pages 167-176, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.
10. A. Gruenheid, D. Kossmann, R. Sukriti, and F. Widmer. Crowdsourcing entity resolution: When is a=b? Technical Report 785, ETH Zurich, Sept. 2012.
11. S. R. Jeffery, L. Sun, M. DeLand, N. Pendar, R. Barber, and A. Galdi. Arnold: Declarative crowd-machine data integration. In CIDR. www.cidrdb.org, 2013.
12. D. R. Karger, S. Oh, and D. Shah. Iterative learning for reliable crowdsourcing systems. In J. Shawe-Taylor, R. S. Zemel, P. L. Bartlett, F. C. N. Pereira, and K. Q. Weinberger, editors, NIPS, pages 1953-1961, 2011.
13. A. Marcus, E. Wu, D. Karger, S. Madden, and R. Miller. Human-powered sorts and joins. Proc. VLDB Endow., 5(1):13-24, Sept. 2011.
14. A. McCallum. Cora dataset. http://www.cs.umass.edu/~mcallum/data/cora-refs.tar.gz, 2004.
15. J. Wang, T. Kraska, M. J. Franklin, and J. Feng. Crowder: crowdsourcing entity resolution. Proc. VLDB Endow., 5(11):1483-1494, July 2012.
16. J. Wang, G. Li, T. Kraska, M. J. Franklin, and J. Feng. Leveraging transitive relations for crowdsourced joins. In K. A. Ross, D. Srivastava, and D. Papadias, editors, SIGMOD Conference, pages 229-240. ACM, 2013.
17. S. E. Whang and H. Garcia-Molina. Developments in generic entity resolution. IEEE Data Eng. Bull., 34(3):51-59, 2011.
18. S. E. Whang, P. Lofgren, and H. Garcia-Molina. Question selection for crowd entity resolution. In PVLDB. Stanford InfoLab, August 2013.
19. W. E. Winkler, W. E. Winkler, and N. P. Overview of record linkage and current research directions. Technical report, Bureau of the Census, 2006.