What is the effect of laparoscopic colectomy on pattern of colon cancer recurrence? A propensity score and competing risk analysis compared with open colectomy

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 21, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 2627-2635

  Hasegawa, Hirotoshi ^a   Okabayashi, Koji ^a,b   Watanabe, Masahiko ^c   Ashrafian, Hutan ^b   Harling, Leanne ^b   Ishii, Yoshiyuki ^a   Sugiyama, Daisuke ^a   Seishima, Ryo ^a   Darzi, Ara ^b   Athanasiou, Thanos ^b   Kitagawa, Yuko ^a  

^a KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c KITASATO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SIZE; CANCER SURGERY; COLON CANCER; COLON RESECTION; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LIVER METASTASIS; LUNG METASTASIS; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; PROPENSITY SCORE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CANCER STAGING; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; LAPAROSCOPY; LIVER NEOPLASMS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; PATHOLOGY; PERITONEAL NEOPLASMS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROGNOSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SECONDARY; SURVIVAL RATE; TUMOR INVASION; TUMOR RECURRENCE;

AGED; COLECTOMY; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LIVER NEOPLASMS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; PERITONEAL NEOPLASMS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROGNOSIS; PROPENSITY SCORE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 84905110200     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3613-x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group, Buunen M, Veldkamp R, et al. Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:44-52
2. Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ. Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASSIC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1638-1645.
3. Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, et al. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246:655-662. (Pubitemid 47480618)
4. Billmeier SE, Ayanian JZ, Zaslavsky AM, Nerenz DR, Jaklitsch MT, Rogers SO. Predictors and outcomes of limited resection for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011; 103:1621-1629.
5. O'Connor ES, Greenblatt DY, LoConte NK, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer with poor prognostic features. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3381-3388.
6. Sunesen KG, Norgaard M, Lundby L, et al. Cause-specific colostomy rates after radiotherapy for anal cancer: a Danish multicentre cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3535-3540.
7. Stelzner S, Hellmich G, Koch R, Witzigmann H. Exactitude of relative survival compared with cause-specific survival and competing risk estimations based on a clinical database of patients with colorectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:1264-1271.
8. Hasegawa H, Kabeshima Y, Watanabe M, Yamamoto S, Kitajima M. Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:636-640. (Pubitemid 36397130)
9. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Japanese classification of colorectal carcinoma. Tokyo: Kanehara;2009.
10. Austin PC. Goodness-of-fit diagnostics for the propensity score model when estimating treatment effects using covariate adjustment with the propensity score. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008;17:1202-1217.
11. Austin PC. The relative ability of different propensity score methods to balance measured covariates between treated and untreated subjects in observational studies. Med Decis Making. 2009;29:661-677.
12. Rubin DB. Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:757-763. (Pubitemid 27446562)
13. Grunkemeier GL, Payne N, Jin R, Handy JR Jr. Propensity score analysis of stroke after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:301-305. (Pubitemid 34836956)
14. Ali A, Abu-Omar Y, Patel A, et al. Valve failure following homograft aortic valve replacement: does implantation technique have an effect? Eur Heart J. 2008;29:1454-1462. (Pubitemid 351806493)
15. Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc. 1999;94:496-509.
16. Compton CC. Pathologic prognostic factors in the recurrence of rectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2002;2:149-160.
17. Wexner SD, Cohen SM. Port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy. Br J Surg. 1995;82: 295-298.
18. Shen MY, Huang IP, Chen WS, Chang JT, Lin JK. Influence of pneumoperitoneum on tumor growth and pattern of intra-abdominal tumor spreading: in vivo study of a murine model. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008;55:947-951.
19. Wittich P, Mearadji A, Marquet RL, Bonjer HJ. Increased tumor growth after high pressure pneumoperitoneum with helium and air. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2004;14:205-208. (Pubitemid 39128703)
20. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359: 2224-2229. (Pubitemid 34717975)
21. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2050-2059.
22. Martel G, Boushey RP. Laparoscopic colon surgery: past, present and future. Surg Clin North Am. 2006;86:867-897. (Pubitemid 44192589)
23. Fitzmaurice G. Confounding: propensity score adjustment. Nutrition. 2006;22:1214-1216. (Pubitemid 44692453)
24. Lacy A. Colon cancer: laparoscopic resection. Ann Oncol. 2005;16(Suppl 2):88-92.
25. Coleman MG, Hanna GB, Kennedy R. The National Training Programme for Laparoscopic Colorectal (LAPCO) Surgery in England: a new training paradigm. Colorectal Dis. 2011; 13:614-616.
26. Fox J, Gross CP, Longo W, Reddy V. Laparoscopic colectomy for the treatment of cancer has been widely adopted in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:501-508.
27. Miskovic D, Wyles SM, Ni M, Darzi AW, Hanna GB. Systematic review on mentoring and simulation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Ann Surg. 2010;252:943-951.
28. Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM, Moyer VA. Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:433-441. (Pubitemid 47073566)
29. Desch CE, McNiff KK, Schneider EC, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/National Comprehensive Cancer Network quality measures. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3631-3637.
30. Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, Papadopoulos T, Merkel S. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation-technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11:354-364.
31. West NP, Hohenberger W, Weber K, Perrakis A, Finan PJ, Quirke P. Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:272-278.
32. Vecht JA, von Segesser LK, Ashrafian H, et al. Translation to success of surgical innovation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010; 37:613-625.
33. Stewart LA, Clarke MJ. Practical methodology of meta-analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data. Cochrane Working Group. Stat Med. 1995;14:2057-2079.
34. Ades AE, Mavranezouli I, Dias S, Welton NJ, Whittington C, Kendall T. Network meta-analysis with competing risk outcomes. Value Health. 2010;13:976-983.