Difference in brain activations during appreciating paintings and photographic analogs

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Volumn 8, Issue JULY, 2014, Pages

  Mizokami, Yoshinori ^a   Terao, Takeshi ^a   Hatano, Koji ^a   Hoaki, Nobuhiko ^a   Kohno, Kentaro ^a   Araki, Yasuo ^a   Kodama, Kensuke ^a   Makino, Mayu ^a   Izumi, Toshihiko ^a   Shimomura, Tsuyoshi ^a   Fujiki, Minoru ^a   Kochiyama, Takanori ^b  

^a OITA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE INTERNATIONAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Appreciation; Beauty; Cuneus; Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI); Lingual gyrus; Oil painting

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN ACTIVATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CUNEUS; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE DISPLAY; LINGUAL GYRUS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PAINTER; PAINTING; PHOTOGRAPHY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION; VOLUNTEER;

EID: 84905089415     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16625161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00478     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Brown, S., Gao, X., Tisdelle, L., Eickhoff, S. B., and Liotti, M. (2011). Naturalizing aesthetics: brain areas for aesthetic appraisal across sensory modalities. Neuroimage 58, 250-258. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.012
2. Cela-Conde, C. J., Ayala, F. J., Munar, E., Maestú, F., Nadal, M., Capó, M. A., et al. (2009). Sex-related similarities and differences in the neural correlates of beauty. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 106, 3847-3852. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900304106
3. Chatterjee, A., Thomas, A., Smith, S. E., and Aguirre, G. K. (2009). The neural response to facial attractiveness. Neuropsychology 23, 135-143. doi: 10.1037/a0014430
4. Cinzia, D. D., and Vittorio, G. (2009). Neuroaesthetics: a review. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 19, 682-687. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2009.09.001
5. Cupchik, G. C., Vartanian, O., Crawley, A., and Mikulis, D. J. (2009). Viewing artworks: contributions of cognitive control and perceptual facilitation to aesthetic experience. Brain Cogn. 70, 84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.01.003
6. Huang, M., Bridge, H., Kemp, M. J., and Parker, A. J. (2011). Human cortical activity evoked by the assignment of authenticity when viewing works of art. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 5:134. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00134
7. Ishizu, T., and Zeki, S. (2011). Toward a brain-based theory of beauty. PLoS One 6:e21852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021852
8. Kawabata, H., and Zeki, S. (2004). Neural correlates of beauty. J. Neurophysiol. 91, 1699-1705. doi: 10.1152/jn.00696.2003
9. Kirk, U. (2008). The neural basis of object-context relationships on aesthetic judgment. PLoS One 3:e3754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003754
10. Kirk, U., Skov, M., Christensen, M. S., and Nygaard, N. (2009a). Brain correlates of aesthetic expertise: a parametric fMRI study. Brain Cogn. 69, 306-315. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.08.004
11. Kirk, U., Skov, M., Hulme, O., Christensen, M. S., and Zeki, S. (2009b). Modulation of aesthetic value by semantic context: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 44, 1125-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.Neuroimage.2008.10.009
12. Lacey, S., Hagtvedt, H., Patrick, V. M., Anderson, A., Stilla, R., Deshpande, G., et al. (2011). Art for reward's sake: visual art recruits the ventral striatum. Neuroimage 55, 420-433. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.027
13. Vartanian, O., and Goel, V. (2004). Neuroanatomical correlates of aesthetic preference for paintings. Neuroreport 15, 893-897. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200404090-00032