Client feedback data in supervision: Effects on supervision and outcome

Training and Education in Professional Psychology

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 182-188

  Grossl, Alyssa B ^a   Reese, Robert J ^a   Norsworthy, Larry A ^a   Hopkins, Nathaniel B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Client progress and outcome; Psychotherapy supervision; Supervisory working alliance; Trainee satisfaction with supervision

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905088256     PISSN: 19313918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/tep0000025     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ackerman, S., Smith, B., Beutler, L. E., Gelso, C. J., Goldfried, M. R., Hill, C.,... Ranier, J. (2001). Empirically supported therapy relationships: Conclusions and recommendations of the Division 29 Task Force. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 38, 495-497. doi: 10.1037/0033-3204.38.4.495
2. American Psychological Association Commission on Accreditation. (2011). Commission on Accreditation Implementing Regulations. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/Ed/accreditation/about/policies/ implementing-guidelines.pdf
3. American Psychological Association Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 271-285. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.271
4. Bambling, M., King, R., Raue, P., Schweitzer, R., & Lambert, W. (2006). Clinical supervision: Its influence on client-rated working alliance and client symptom reduction in the brief treatment of major depression. Psychotherapy Research, 16, 317-331. doi:10.1080/ 10503300500268524
5. Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2009). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
6. Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 16, 252-260. doi:10.1037/h0085885
7. Brown, G. S., & Jones, D. R. (2005). Implementation of a feedback system in a managed care environment: What are patients teaching us? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 187-198. doi:10.1002/jclp.20110
8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Duncan, B. L. (2010). On becoming a better therapist. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/12080-000
10. Duncan, B. L. (2011). The Partners for Change Outcome Management System (PCOMS): Administration, scoring, interpreting update for the Outcome and Session Ratings Scale. Jensen Beach, FL: Author.
11. Efstation, J. F., Patton, M. J., & Kardash, C. M. (1990). Measuring the working alliance in counselor supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 322-329. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.37.3.322
12. Ellis, M. V. (1991). Critical incidents in clinical supervision and in supervisor supervision: Assessing supervisory issues. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 342-349. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.38.3.342
13. Ellis, M. V., & Ladany, N. (1997). Inferences concerning supervisees and clients in clinical supervision: An integrative review. In C. E. Watkins (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 447-507). New York, NY: Wiley.
14. Fernando, D. M., & Hulse-Killacky, D. (2005). The relationship of supervisory styles to satisfaction with supervision and the perceived selfefficacy of masters's level counseling students. Counselor Education and Supervision, 44, 293-304. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6978.2005.tb01757.x
15. Kozina, K., Grabovari, N., De Stefano, J., & Drapeu, M. (2010). Measuring changes in counselor self-efficacy: Further validation and implications for training and supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 29, 117-127. doi:10.1080/07325223.2010.517483
16. Ladany, N., Hill, C. E., Corbett, M. M., & Nutt, E. A. (1996). Nature, extent, and importance of what psychotherapy trainees do not disclose to their supervisors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 10-24. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.43.1.10
17. Lambert, M. J. (2001). Psychotherapy outcome and quality improvement: Introduction to the special section on patient-focused research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 147-149. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.69.2.147
18. Lambert, M. J., Hansen, N. B., Umphress, V., Lunnen, K., Okiishi, J., Burlingame, G. M., & Reisenger, C. W. (1996). Administration and scoring manual for the OQ 45.2. Stevenson, MD: American Professional Credentialing Services.
19. Lambert, M. J., & Hawkins, E. J. (2001). Using information about patient progress in supervision: Are outcomes enhanced? Australian Psychologist, 36, 131-138. doi:10.1080/00050060108259645
20. Lambert, M. J., & Shimokawa, K. (2011). Collecting client feedback. Psychotherapy, 48, 72-79. doi:10.1037/a0022238
21. Lehrman-Waterman, D., & Ladany, N. (2001). Development and validation of the Evaluation Process Within Supervision Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 168-177. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.48.2.168
22. Miller, S. D., & Duncan, B. L. (2000). The Outcome Rating Scale. Chicago, IL: Author.
23. Miller, S. D., Duncan, B. L., Brown, J., Sparks, J. A., & Claud, D. A. (2003). The Outcome Rating Scale: A preliminary study of the reliability, validity, and feasibility of a brief, visual, analog measure. Journal of Brief Therapy, 2, 91-100.
24. Miller, S. D., Duncan, B. L., & Johnson, L. D. (2000). The Session Rating Scale 3.0. Chicago, IL: Author.
25. Paccagnella, O. (2006). Centering or not centering in multilevel models? The role of the group mean and the assessment group effects. Evaluation Review, 30, 66-85. doi:10.1177/0193841X05275649
26. Patton, M. J., & Kivlighan, D. M. (1997). Relevance of supervisory alliance to the counseling alliance and to treatment adherence in counselor training. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44, 108-115. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.44.1.108
27. Peugh, J. L. (2010). A practical guide to multilevel modeling. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 85-112. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2009.09.002
28. Reese, R. J., Norsworthy, L. A., & Rowlands, S. (2009). Does a continuous feedback system improve psychotherapy outcome? Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 46, 418-431. doi:10.1037/a0017901
29. Reese, R. J., Usher, E. L., Bowman, D. C., Norsworthy, L. A., Halstead, J. L., Rowlands, S. R., & Chisolm, R. R. (2009). Using client feedback in psychotherapy training: An analysis of its influence on supervision and counselor self-efficacy. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3, 157-168. doi:10.1037/a0015673
30. Son, E., & Ellis, M. V. (2013). A cross-cultural comparison of clinical supervision in South Korea and the United States. Psychotherapy, 50, 189-205. doi:10.1037/a0033115
31. Sparks, J. A., Kisler, T. A., Adams, J. F., & Blumen, D. G. (2011). Teaching accountability: Using client feedback to train effective family therapists. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 37, 452-467. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00224.x
32. Stoltenberg, C. D. (2005). Enhancing professional competence through developmental approaches to supervision. American Psychologist, 60, 857-864. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.8.85
33. Stoltenberg, C. D., & McNeill, B. W. (2012). Supervision: Research, models, and competence. In N. A. Fouad & L. M. Subich (Eds.), ZAPA handbook of counseling psychology (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 295-327). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
34. Watkins, C. (2011). Does psychotherapy supervision contribute to patient outcomes? Considering thirty years of research. The Clinical Supervisor, 30, 235-256. doi:10.1080/07325223.2011.619417
35. Worthen, V. E., & Lambert, M. J. (2007). Outcome-oriented supervision: Advantages of adding systematic client tracking to supportive consultations. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 7, 48-53. doi:10.1080/ 14733140601140873