Study of decision framework of wind farm project plan selection under intuitionistic fuzzy set and fuzzy measure environment

Energy Conversion and Management

Volumn 87, Issue , 2014, Pages 274-284

  Wu, Yunna ^a   Geng, Shuai ^a   Xu, Hu ^a   Zhang, Haobo ^a  

^a NORTH CHINA ELECTRIC POWER UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Compensatory problem of performance scores; Fuzzy measure; Intuitionistic fuzzy number; Multi criteria decision making (MCDM); Wind farm project plan selection

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ELECTRIC UTILITIES; FUZZY RULES; FUZZY SYSTEMS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

COMPENSATORY PROBLEM OF PERFORMANCE SCORES; FUZZY MEASURES; INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY NUMBER; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; PROJECT PLANS;

WIND POWER;

EID: 84905055912     PISSN: 01968904     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. A.H.I. Lee, H.H. Chen, and H.-Y. Kang Multi-criteria decision making on strategic selection of wind farms Renew Energy 34 2009 120 126
2. H.H. Chen, H.-Y. Kang, and A.H. Lee Strategic selection of suitable projects for hybrid solar-wind power generation systems Renew Sust Energy Rev 14 2010 413 421
3. H.H. Chen, A.H. Lee, and H.-Y. Kang A model for strategic selection of feeder management systems: a case study Int J Electr Power 32 2010 421 427
4. E. Lozano-Minguez, A. Kolios, and F.P. Brennan Multi-criteria assessment of offshore wind turbine support structures Renew Energy 36 2011 2831 2837
5. M. De, and K.W. Hipel A fuzzy multicriteria model for comparing energy projects Energy 12 1987 599 613
6. C. Tan, and X. Chen Intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral operator for multi-criteria decision making Expert Syst Appl 37 2010 149 157
7. Ö. Erol, and B. KIlkIş An energy source policy assessment using analytical hierarchy process Energy Convers Manage 63 2012 245 252
8. X. Liang, X. Sun, G. Shu, K. Sun, X. Wang, and X. Wang Using the analytic network process (ANP) to determine method of waste energy recovery from engine Energy Convers Manage 66 2013 304 311
9. A. Shanian, and O. Savadogo TOPSIS multiple-criteria decision support analysis for material selection of metallic bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte fuel cell J Power Sources 159 2006 1095 1104
10. M. Beccali, M. Cellura, and D. Ardente Decision making in energy planning: the ELECTRE multicriteria analysis approach compared to a fuzzy-sets methodology Energy Convers Manage 39 1998 1869 1881
11. A. Zakariazadeh, S. Jadid, and P. Siano Economic-environmental energy and reserve scheduling of smart distribution systems: a multiobjective mathematical programming approach Energy Convers Manage 78 2014 151 164
12. E. Heo, J. Kim, and K.-J. Boo Analysis of the assessment factors for renewable energy dissemination program evaluation using fuzzy AHP Renew Sust Energy Rev 14 2010 2214 2220
13. A.H. Lee, M.-C. Hung, H.-Y. Kang, and W. Pearn A wind turbine evaluation model under a multi-criteria decision making environment Energy Convers Manage 64 2012 289 300
14. F. Cavallaro Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for assessing thermal-energy storage in concentrated solar power (CSP) systems Appl Energy 87 2010 496 503
15. K.T. Atanassov Intuitionistic fuzzy sets Fuzzy Sets Syst 20 1986 87 96
16. F.E. Boran, S. Genç, M. Kurt, and D. Akay A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method Expert Syst Appl 36 2009 11363 11368
17. M. Grabisch Fuzzy integral in multicriteria decision making Fuzzy Set Syst 69 1995 279 298
18. M. Grabisch, M. Sugeno, and T. Murofushi Fuzzy measures and integrals: theory and applications 2000 Springer-Verlag, Inc. New York
19. D. Liginlal, and T.T. Ow Modeling attitude to risk in human decision processes: an application of fuzzy measures Fuzzy Set Syst 157 2006 3040 3054
20. F.R. Lima Jr., L. Osiro, and L.C.R. Carpinetti A fuzzy inference and categorization approach for supplier selection using compensatory and non-compensatory decision rules Appl Soft Comput 13 2013 4133 4147
21. S.d.F.D. Daher, and A.T. de Almeida Minimizing the compensatory effect of MCDM group decision additive aggregation using the veto concept Evolutionary multi-criterion optimization 2013 Springer 500 512
22. D. Bouyssou Some remarks on the notion of compensation in MCDM Eur J Oper Res 26 1986 150 160
23. T.w.e.p.c.o.t.C.r.e. institute, V.W. Systems(China). The research report of China's wind power generation evaluation system; 2011.
24. D. Arditi, and H.M. Gunaydin Total quality management in the construction process Int J Proj Manage 15 1997 235 243
25. T. Weaver Financial appraisal of operational offshore wind energy projects Renew Sust Energy Rev 16 2012 5110 5120
26. V. Gass, J. Schmidt, F. Strauss, and E. Schmid Assessing the economic wind power potential in Austria Energy Policy 2012
27. A. Clarke Wind farm location and environmental impact Int J Ambient Energy 10 1989 129 144
28. M. Madders, and D.P. Whitfield Upland raptors and the assessment of wind farm impacts Int J Ambient Energy 148 2006 43 56
29. G. Gamboa, and G. Munda The problem of windfarm location: a social multi-criteria evaluation framework Energy Policy 35 2007 1564 1583
30. X. Guo Social stability risk assessment should be added in the major project evaluation China Sci Forum 2012 18 22
31. M. Sugeno Fuzzy measures and fuzzy integrals: a survey Fuzzy Automata Decis Process 78 1977 89 102
32. K. Atanassov, G. Pasi, and R. Yager Intuitionistic fuzzy interpretations of multi-criteria multi-person and multi-measurement tool decision making Int J Syst Sci 36 2005 859 868
33. C. Tan, and X. Chen Intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral operator for multi-criteria decision making Expert Syst Appl 37 2010 149 157
34. C. Tan Generalized intuitionistic fuzzy geometric aggregation operator and its application to multi-criteria group decision making Soft Comput 15 2011 867 876