Exploring the relationship among user satisfaction, compliance, and clinical outcomes of telemedicine services for glucose control

Telemedicine and e-Health

Volumn 20, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 712-720

  Rho, Mi Jung ^a   Kim, Si Ra ^a   Kim, Hun Sung ^a   Cho, Jae Hyoung ^a   Yoon, Kun Ho ^a   Mun, Seong K ^b   Choi, In Young ^a  

^a The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

compliance; diabetes management; hemoglobin A1c; telemedicine; user satisfaction

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; HEMOGLOBIN; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TELEMEDICINE;

COMPLIANCE; DIABETES MANAGEMENT; FACILITATING CONDITIONS; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SIMPLE LINEAR REGRESSION; TELEMEDICINE PROJECTS; USER SATISFACTION;

COMPLIANCE CONTROL;

GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; GLYCOSYLATED HEMOGLOBIN;

ADULT; ANALYSIS; BLOOD; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TELEMEDICINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; BLOOD GLUCOSE; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; HEMOGLOBIN A, GLYCOSYLATED; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TELEMEDICINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84905019182     PISSN: 15305627     EISSN: 15563669     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0309     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. World Health Organization. Diabetes programme: Facts & figures. 2010. Available at www.who.int/diabetes/facts/world-figures/en/(last accessed August 30, 2013
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes fact sheet: National estimates and general information on diabtes and prediabetes in the United States, 2011. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011.
3. Korean Diabetes Association. Korean diabetes research report. Seoul: Korean Diabetes Association, 2012.
4. Korea Health Industry Development Institute. Basic plan for U-healthcare R&D. Publication number 2008-44. Seoul: Korea Health Industry Development Institute, 2008.
5. Landau Z, Mazor-Aronovitch K, Boaz M, Blaychfeld-Magnazi M, Graph-Barel C, Levek-Motola N, Pinhas-Hamiel O. The effectiveness of Internet-based blood glucose monitoring system on improving diabetes control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 2012;13:203-207.
6. Lee JB, Rho MJ. Perception of influencing factors on acceptance of mobile health monitoring service: A comparison between users and non-users. Healthc Inform Res 2013;9:167-176.
7. Rho MJ, Kim HS, Chung KY, Cho IY. Factors influencing the acceptance of telemedicine for diabetes management. Cluster Comput 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s10586-014-0356-1.
8. Ferrer-Roca O, Cárdenas A, Diaz-Cardama A, Pulido P. Mobile phone text messaging in the management of diabetes. J Telemed Telecare 2004;10: 282-285.
9. Gammon DA, Arsand E, Walseth O, Andersson N, Jenssen M, Taylor T. Parentchild interaction using a mobile and wireless system for blood glucose monitoring. J Med Internet Res 2005;7:e57.
10. Bellazzi R, Larizza C, Montani S, Riva A, Stefanelli M, d'Annunzio G, Lorini R, Gomez EJ, Hernando E, Brugues E, Cermeno J, Corcoy R, de Leiva A, Cobelli C, Nucci G, Del Prato S, Maran A, Kilkki E, Tuominen J. A telemedicine support for diabetes management: The T-IDDM project. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2002;69:147-161.
11. Davis RM, Hitch AD, Salaam MM, Herman WH, Zimmer-Galler IE, Mayer-Davis EJ. Telehealth improves diabetes self-management in an underserved community. Diabetes Care 2010;33:1712-1717.
12. Bellazzi R, Arcelloni M, Ferrari P, Decata P, Hernando ME, García A, Gazzaruso C, Gómez EJ, Larizza C, Fratino P, Stefanelli M. Management of patients with diabetes through information technology: Tools for monitoring and control of the patients' metabolic behavior. Diabetes Technol Ther 2004;6:567-578.
13. Kraai IH, Luttik MLA, de Jong RM, Jaarsma T, Hillege HL. Heart failure patients monitored with telemedicine: Patient satisfaction, a review of the literature. J Card Fail 2011;17:684-690.
14. Shikiar R, Rentz AM. Satisfaction with medication: An overview of conceptual, methodologic, and regulatory issues. Value Health 2004;7:204-215.
15. Ware JJE Jr, Snyder MK, Wright WR, Davies AR. Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care. Eval Program Plann 1983;6:247-263.
16. Hsu CL, Tseng KC, Chuang YH. Predictors of future use of telehomecare health services by middle-aged people in Taiwan. Soc Behav Personality 2011;39:1251-1261.
17. Aggelidis VP, Chatzoglou PD. Using a modified technology acceptance model in hospitals. Int J Med Inform 2009;78:115-126.
18. Chau PYK, Hu PJH. Investigating healthcare professionals' decisions to accept telemedicine technology: An empirical test of competing theories. Inform Manage 2002;39:297-311.
19. Tung FC, Chang SC, Chou CM. An extension of trust and TAM model with IDT in the adoption of the electronic logistics information system in HIS in the medical industry. Int J Med Inform 2008;77:324-335.
20. Wu JH, Wang SC, Lind LM. Mobile computing acceptance factors in the healthcare industry: A structural equation model. Int J Med Inform 2007;76:66-77.
21. Jung ML, Berthon P. Fulfilling the promise: A model for delivering successful online health care. J Med Market 2009;9:243-254.
22. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q 2003;27:425-478.
23. Schaper LK, Pervan GP. ICT and OTs: A model of information and communication technology acceptance and utilization by occupational therapists. Int J Med Inform 2007;76(Suppl 1):S212-S221.
24. Schrijver GJ. The user of video-telephony in the care process of ALS patients [Master's thesis]. Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, 2008.
25. Eikelboom RH, Atlas MD. Attitude to telemedicine, and willingness to use it, in audiology patients. J Telemed Telecare 2005;11:22-25.
26. Martinez A, Everss E, Rojo-Alvarez JL, Figal DP, Garcia-Alberola A. A systematic review of the literature on home monitoring for patients with heart failure. J Telemed Telecare 2006;12:234-241.
27. Hjelm NM. Benefits and drawbacks of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 2005;11:60-70.
28. Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Bruster S, Richards N, Chandola T. Patients' experiences and satisfaction with health care: Results of a questionnaire study of specific aspects of care. Qual Saf Health Care 2002;11:335-339.
29. Katz SJ, Moyer CA. The emerging role of online communication between patients and their providers. J Gen Intern Med 2004;19:978-983.
30. Chang IC, Hwang HG, Hung WF, Li YC. Physicians' acceptance of pharmacokinetics-based clinical decision support systems. Expert Syst Appl 2007;33:296-303.
31. Cardozo L, Steinberg J. Telemedicine for recently discharged older patients. Telemed J E Health 2010;16:49-55.
32. Alaloola NA, Albedaiwi WA. Patient satisfaction in a Riyadh tertiary care centre. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2008;21:630-637.
33. Manaf NHA. Inpatient satisfaction: An analysis of Malaysian public hospitals. Int J Public Sector Manage 2012;25:6-16.
34. Cho JH, Lee HC, Lim DJ, Kwon HS, Yoon KH. Mobile communication using a mobile phone with a glucometer for glucose control in Type 2 patients with diabetes: As effective as an Internet-based glucose monitoring system. J Telemed Telecare 2009;15:77-82.
35. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 1989;13:319-340.
36. Heijden HVD. User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Q 2004;28:695-704.
37. Liu L, Ma Q. The impact of service level on the acceptance of application service oriented medical records. Inform Manage 2005;42:1121-1135.
38. Jung SG, Kweon HJ, Kim ET, Kim SA, Choi JK, Cho DY. Preference and awareness of telemedicine in primary care patients. Korean J Fam Med 2012;33:25-33.
39. Park HY, Chon YC, Lee JS, Choi IJ, Yoon KH. Service design attributes affecting diabetic patient preferences of telemedicine in South Korea. Telemed J E Health 2011;17:442-451.
40. Lim S, Kim SY, Kim JI, Kwon MK, Min SJ, Yoo SY, Kang SM, Kim HI, Jung HS, Park KS, Ryu JO, Shin H, Jang HC. A survey on ubiquitous healthcare service demand among diabetic patients. Diabetes Metab J 2011;35:50-57.
41. Veld RMHAH, Kosterink SM, Barbe T, Lindegard A, Marecek T, Vollenbroek-Hutten MMR. Relation between patient satisfaction, compliance and the clinical benefit of a teletreatment application for chronic pain. J Telemed Telecare 2010;16:322-328.
42. Holtz B, Lauckner C. Diabetes management via mobile phones: A systematic review. Telemed J E Health 2012;18:175-184.
43. Azar M, Gabbay R. Web-based management of diabetes through glucose uploads: Has the time come for telemedicine? Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2009;83:9-17.
44. Kesavadev J, Shankar A, Pillai PBS, Krishnan G, Jothydev S. Cost-effective use of telemedicine and self-monitoring of blood glucose via Diabetes Tele Management System (DTMS) to achieve target glycosylated hemoglobin values without serious symptomatic hypoglycemia in 1,000 subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus-A retrospective study. Diabetes Technol Ther 2012;14:772-776.
45. Smith KE, Levine B, Clement SC, Hu MJ, Alaoui A, Mun SK. Impact of MyCareTeam for poorly controlled diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Technol Ther 2004;6:828-835.
46. Weinstock RS, Teresi JA, Goland R, Izquierdo Roberto, Palmas W, Eimicke JP, Ebner S, Shea S; The IDEATel Consortium. Glycemic control and health disparities in older ethnically diverse underserved adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2011;34:274-279.
47. Cho JH, Kim HS, Han JH, Lee JH, Oh JA, Choi YH, Yoon KH. Ubiquitous diabetes management system via interactive communication based on information technologies: Clinical effects and perspectives. Korean Diabetes J 2010;34:267-273.