Lesion locations influencing baseline severity and early recovery in ischaemic stroke

European Journal of Neurology

Volumn 21, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 1226-1232

  Bentley, P ^a   Kumar, G ^a   Rinne, P ^a   Buddha, S ^a   Kallingal, J ^a   Hookway, C ^a   Sharma, P ^a   Mehta, A ^a   Beckmann, C ^a,b,c  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Lesion mapping; National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; Prognosis; Recovery; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; BRAIN STEM; CONVALESCENCE; CORPUS STRIATUM; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FRONTAL CORTEX; HUMAN; INSULA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE FRONTAL GYRUS; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH STROKE SCALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARIETAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH; TEMPORAL CORTEX; WHITE MATTER; BRAIN; COMPLICATION; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROGNOSIS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STROKE; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BRAIN; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STROKE;

EID: 84904905127     PISSN: 13515101     EISSN: 14681331     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ene.12464     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Grefkes C, Fink GR. Reorganization of cerebral networks after stroke: new insights from neuroimaging with connectivity approaches. Brain 2011; 134: 1264-1276.
2. Kim SH, Jang SH. Prediction of aphasia outcome using diffusion tensor tractography for arcuate fasciculus in stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013; 34: 785-790.
3. Riley JD, Le V, Der-Yeghiaian L, et al. Anatomy of stroke injury predicts gains from therapy. Stroke 2011; 42: 421-426.
4. Stinear CM, Ward NS. How useful is imaging in predicting outcomes in stroke rehabilitation? Int J Stroke 2013; 8: 33-37.
5. Coupar F, Pollock A, Rowe P, Weir C, Langhorne P. Predictors of upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil 2012; 26: 291-313.
6. Lo R, Gitelman D, Levy R, Hulvershorn J, Parrish T. Identification of critical areas for motor function recovery in chronic stroke subjects using voxel-based lesion symptom mapping. Neuroimage 2010; 49: 9-18.
7. Menezes NM, Ay H, Wang Zhu M, et al. The real estate factor: quantifying the impact of infarct location on stroke severity. Stroke 2007; 38: 194-197.
8. Saver JL, Gornbein J, Starkman S. Graphic reanalysis of the two NINDS-tPA trials confirms substantial treatment benefit. Stroke 2010; 41: 2381-2390.
9. Bates E, Wilson SM, Saygin AP, et al. Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. Nat Neurosci 2003; 6: 448-450.
10. Hope TM, Seghier ML, Leff AP, Price CJ. Predicting outcome and recovery after stroke with lesions extracted from MRI images. Neuroimage Clin 2013; 2: 424-433.
11. Williams LS, Yilmaz EY, Lopez-Yunez AM. Retrospective assessment of initial stroke severity with the NIH Stroke Scale. Stroke 2000; 31: 858-862.
12. Bruno A, Saha C, Williams LS. Percent change on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: a useful acute stroke outcome measure. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2009; 18: 56-59.
13. Wahlund LO, Barkhof F, Fazekas F, et al. A new rating scale for age-related white matter changes applicable to MRI and CT. Stroke 2001; 32: 1318-1322.
14. Anderson M, Robinson J. Permutation tests for linear models. Aust N Z J Stat 2001; 43: 75-88.
15. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 1995; 57: 289-300.
16. Smith DV, Clithero JA, Rorden C, Karnath HO. Decoding the anatomical network of spatial attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013; 110: 1518-1523.
17. Zhu LL, Lindenberg R, Alexander MP, Schlaug G. Lesion load of the corticospinal tract predicts motor impairment in chronic stroke. Stroke 2010; 41: 910-915.
18. Zhang Y, Zhang J, Oishi K, et al. Atlas-guided tract reconstruction for automated and comprehensive examination of the white matter anatomy. Neuroimage 2010; 52: 1289-1301.
19. Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Twisk J. Impact of time on improvement of outcome after stroke. Stroke 2006; 37: 2348-2353.
20. Hallevi H, Albright KC, Martin-Schild SB, et al. Recovery after ischemic stroke: criteria for good outcome by level of disability at day 7. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009; 28: 341-348.
21. Kerr DM, Fulton RL, Lees KR, VISTA Collaborators. Seven-day NIHSS is a sensitive outcome measure for exploratory clinical trials in acute stroke: evidence from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive. Stroke 2012; 43: 1401-1403.
22. Debas K, Carrier J, Orban P, et al. Brain plasticity related to the consolidation of motor sequence learning and motor adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010; 107: 17839-17844.
23. Thullier F, Lalonde R, Mahler P, Joyal CC, Lestienne F. Dorsal striatal lesions in rats. 1: Effects on exploration and motor coordination. Arch Physiol Biochem 1996; 104: 300-306.
24. Lee KY, Latour LL, Luby M, Hsia AW, Merino JG, Warach S. Distal hyperintense vessels on FLAIR: an MRI marker for collateral circulation in acute stroke? Neurology 2009; 72: 1134-1139.
25. Robertson IH, Ridgeway V, Greenfield E, Parr A. Motor recovery after stroke depends on intact sustained attention: a 2-year follow-up study. Neuropsychology 1997; 11: 290-295.