Revealing Rembrandt

Frontiers in Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue 8 APR, 2014, Pages

  Parker, Andrew J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Art; Authenticity; Cortical response properties; FMRI; Rembrandt

Indexed keywords

ANXIETY; ART; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; DISGUST; FEAR; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; NEUROSCIENCE; PAINTER; REVIEW; VISUAL INFORMATION;

EID: 84904889343     PISSN: 16624548     EISSN: 1662453X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00076     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Biederman, I., and Shiffrar, M. M. (1987). Sexing day-old chicks: a case study and expert systems analysis of a difficult perceptual-learning task. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 13:640. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.13.4.640
2. Camille, N., Coricelli, G., Sallet, J., Pradat-Diehl, P., Duhamel, J.-R., and Sirigu, A. (2004). The involvement of the orbitofrontal cortex in the experience of regret. Science 304, 1167-1170. doi: 10.1126/science.1094550
3. Cela-Conde, C. J., Ayala, F. J., Munar, E., Maestú, F., Nadal, M., Capó, M. A., et al. (2009). Sex-related similarities and differences in the neural correlates of beauty. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 3847-3852. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900304106
4. Gerhard, H. E., and Bethge, M. (2014). Towards rigorous study of artistic style: a new psychophysical paradigm. Art and Percept. 2, 23-44. doi: 10.1163/22134913-00002010
5. Huang, M., Bridge, H., Kemp, M. J., and Parker, A. J. (2011). Human cortical activity evoked by the assignment of authenticity when viewing works of art. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 5:134. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00134
6. Ijpma, F. F., van de Graaf, R. C., Nicolai, J. P., and Meek, M. F. (2006). [The anatomy lesson of Dr Nicolaes Tulp by Rembrandt (1632) and the findings during dissection of the forearm of a cadaver: anatomical discrepancies]. Ned. Tijdschr. Geneeskd. 150, 2756-2765. Available online at: http://www.ntvg.nl/publicatie/de-anatomische-les-van-dr-nicolaes-tulp-door-rembrandt-1632-en-de-bevindingen-bij-de-diss/volledig
7. Jacobs, R. H. A. H., Renken, R., and Cornelissen, F. W. (2012). Neural correlates of visual aesthetics - beauty as the coalescence of stimulus and internal state. PLoS ONE 7:e31248. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031248
8. Jacobsen, T., Schubotz, R. I., Höfel, L., and Cramon, D. Y. V. (2006). Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty. Neuroimage 29, 276-285. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.010
9. Kawabata, H., and Zeki, S. (2004). Neural correlates of beauty. J. Neurophysiol. 91, 1699-1705. doi: 10.1152/jn.00696.2003
10. Khoshdel, D. D. (2012). BBC Radio 4 "So You Want To Be A Scientist." Available online at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006qyyb/profiles/dara-djavan-khoshdel:BBC
11. Koechlin, E., and Hyafil, A. (2007). Anterior prefrontal function and the limits of human decision-making. Science 318, 594-598. doi: 10.1126/science.1142995
12. Koenderink, J. J., and van Doorn, A. J. (2003). Local structure of Gaussian texture. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. E86d, 1165-1171. Available online at: http://search.ieice.org/bin/summary.php?id=e86-d_7_1165
13. Locher, P. (2011). Contemporary experimental aesthetics: state of the art technology. Iperception. 2, 697-707. doi: 10.1068/i0449aap
14. Munar, E., Nadal, M., Castellanos, N. P., Flexas, A., Maest, F., Mirasso, C., et al. (2012). Aesthetic appreciation: from time-frequency analysis to synchronization. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 5:185. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00185
15. Nessim, B. (1997). Gallery Artworks. Leonardo 30, 405-432. doi: 10.2307/1576501
16. Pang, C. Y., Nadal, M., Müller-Paul, J. S., Rosenberg, R., and Klein, C. (2013). Electrophysiological correlates of looking at paintings and its association with art expertise. Biol. Psychol. 93, 246-254. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.10.013
17. Pihko, E., Virtanen, A., Saarinen, V.-M., Pannasch, S., Hirvenkari, L., Tossavainen, T., et al. (2011). Experiencing art: the influence of expertise and painting abstraction level. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 5:94. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00094
18. Rolls, E. T. (2000). The orbitofrontal cortex and reward. Cereb. Cortex 10, 284-294. doi: 10.1093/cercor/10.3.284
19. Ruderman, D. L., Bialek, W. (1994). Statistics of natural images - scaling in the woods. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 814-817. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.814
20. Seinstra, F. J. (2010). A Web Catalogue of Rembrandt Paintings. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
21. Smith, J., and Smith, L. (2001). Spending time on art. Empir. Stud. Arts 19, 229-236. doi: 10.2190/5MQM-59JH-X21R-JN5J
22. Solso, R. L. (2000). The cognitive neuroscience of art: a preliminary fMRI observation. J. Conscious. Stud. 7, 75-86. Available online at: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/imp/jcs/2000/00000007/F0020008/1043
23. Travers, T. (2006). Museums and Galleries in Britain: Economic, Social and Creative Impacts. London: London School of Economics.
24. van der Schaaf, A., and van Hateren, J. H. (1996). Modelling the power spectra of natural images: statistics and information. Vision Res. 36, 2759-2770. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(96)00002-8
25. van de Wetering, E. (ed.). (2005). A Corpus of Rembrandt Paintings IV Self Portraits. Dordrecht: Springer.
26. van Hateren, J. H., and van der Schaaf, A. (1998). Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex. Proc. Biol. Sci. 265, 359-366. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0303
27. van Sonnenburg, H. (1995). Rembrandt/not Rembrandt: Aspects of Connoisseurship, ed Art MMo. New York, NY: Metropolitan Museum of Art.
28. Wallraven, C., Fleming, R., Cunningham, D., Rigau, J., Feixas, M., and Sbert, M. (2009). Categorizing art: comparing humans and computers. Comput. Graph. 33, 484-495. doi: 10.1016/j.cag.2009.04.003
29. Zeki, S., Romaya, J. P., Benincasa, D. M. T., and Atiyah, M. F. (2014). The experience of mathematical beauty and its neural correlates. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:68. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00068