The involvement of the orbitofrontal cortex in the experience of regret

Science

Volumn 304, Issue 5674, 2004, Pages 1167-1170

  Camille, Nathalie ^a   Coricelli, Giorgio ^a,b   Sallet, Jerome ^a   Pradat Diehl, Pascale ^c   Duhamel, Jean René ^a   Sirigu, Angela ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

^c PITIÉ SALPÊTRIÈRE HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; DISEASES; GENETIC ENGINEERING; PATIENT MONITORING;

COGNITIVE PROCESS; EMOTIONAL IMPACT;

BIOCHEMISTRY;

BEHAVIOR; BIOLOGY;

ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMOTION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; ORBITAL CORTEX; PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; SKIN CONDUCTANCE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; BRAIN DISEASES; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; EMOTIONS; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE; GAMBLING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; THINKING;

EID: 2442707672     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1094550     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. D. Kahneman, D. Miller, Psychol. Rev. 93, 136 (1986).
2. Consider the following example: "Eight years ago a man from Liverpool in UK, committed suicide. He decided to end his life after he knew that he missed out on a ℒ2 million prize in the National Lottery. While watching television he saw the numbers of his winning combination, 14, 17, 22, 24, 42, and 47, appearing one by one on the screen. He always played these numbers, but on this occasion, he had not renewed his ticket on time which actually expired the previous Saturday" (23). Although extreme, this example illustrates the profound regret this man felt once he knew the opportunity he missed to become very rich.
3. N. J. Roese, J. M. Olson, What Might Have Been: The Social Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 1995).
4. R. M. J. Byrne, Trends Cogn. Sci. 6, 426 (2002).
5. B. Mellers, I. Ritov, A. Schwartz, J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 3, 332 (1999).
6. M. Zeelenberg, J. Beattie, J. van der Pligt, N. K. de Vries, Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 65, 148 (1996).
7. D. E. Bell, Oper. Res. 30, 961 (1982).
8. G. Loomes, R. Sugden, Econ. J. 92, 805 (1982).
9. E. T. Rolls, Cereb. Cortex 10, 284 (2000).
10. H. C. Breiter, I. Ahron, D. Kahneman, A. Dale, P. Shizgal, Neuron 30, 619 (2001).
11. R. Elliott, J. L. Newman, O. A. Longe, W. J. F. Deakin, J. Neurosci. 23, 303 (2003).
12. L. Tremblay, W. Schultz, Nature 398, 704 (1999).
13. R. J. Dolan. Science 298, 1191 (2002).
14. A. Bechara, A. R. Damasio, H. Damasio, S. W. Anderson, Cognition 50, 7 (1994).
15. V. Goel, J. Grafman, J. Takik, S. Gana, D. Danto, Brain 120, 1805 (1997).
16. A. Bechara, H. Damasio, A. R. Damasio, Cereb. Cortex 10, 295 (2000).
17. Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
18. Avoiding a Loss of 200 changes the negative impact of Losing 50 into a neutral affective response. Data for +50 obtained / -200 unobtained versus +50 obtained / -50 unobtained show that the emotional evaluation (elation) is higher in the first case compared with the second one. Thus, the magnitude of the avoided monetary loss does influence emotional response, indicating that relief is present (table S3).
19. J. Von Neumann, O. Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1944).
20. One could argue that the regret effect is not independent from the disappointment induced by the unobtained outcome of the chosen gamble. However, when reanalyzed as a function of the latter variable (fig. S4), the affective ratings in the complete feedback condition are much less contrasted then when analyzed as a function of the unchosen gamble's outcome.
21. N. H. Frijda, P. Kuipers, E. ter Schure, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 57, 212 (1989).
22. M. Zeelenberg, W. W. van Dijk, A. S. R. Manstead, J. Van der Pligt, Cognition and Emotion 14, 521 (2000).
23. M. Zeelenberg, E. van Dijk, in D. Mandel, D. Hilton, P. Catelani, Eds., The Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking (Routledge, London, 2004).
24. We thank M. Thevenet, L. Granjon, and B. Messaoudi for technical support. This work was supported by Action Concertée Incitative (Systèmes complexes en sciences humaines et sociales) from CNRS.