eHealth: Where next?

British Journal of General Practice

Volumn 64, Issue 624, 2014, Pages 325-326

  Murray, Elizabeth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY CARE; CONSULTATION; E-MAIL; EDITORIAL; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH CARE NEED; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; INTERNET; MOBILE PHONE; TELECOMMUNICATION; TELEHEALTH; TELEVISION; GENERAL PRACTICE; MANAGEMENT; MASS COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PROCEDURES; TELEMEDICINE; TRENDS; UNITED KINGDOM;

DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; GENERAL PRACTICE; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH POLICY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; POLICY MAKING; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 84904873676     PISSN: 09601643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp14X680365     Document Type: Editorial

References (17)

1. Glynn LG, Hayes PS, Casey M, et al. Effectiveness of a smartphone application to promote physical activity in primary care: a SMART MOVE randomised controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract 2014; DOI: 10.3399/bjgp14X680461.
2. Williams V, Price J, Hardinge W, et al. Using a mobile health application to support selfmanagement in COPD: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 2014; DOI: 10.3399/bjgp14X680473.
3. MacNeill V, Sanders C, Fitzpatrick R, et al. Experiences of front-line health professionals delivering telehealth: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 2014; DOI: 10.3399/bjgp14X680485.
4. Gillam S. Telephone triage in-hours: does it work? Br J Gen Pract 2014; DOI: 10.3399/bjgp14X680377.
5. Wanless D. Securing our future health: taking a long-term view. London: HM Treasury, 2002.
6. Oh H, Rizo C, Enkin M, Jadad A. What is eHealth (3): a systematic review of published definitions. J Med Internet Res 2005; 7(1): e1.
7. Webb TL, Joseph J, Yardley L, Michie S. Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J Med Internet Res 2010; 12(1): e4.
8. Harris J, Felix L, Miners A, et al. Adaptive e-learning to improve dietary behaviour: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess 2011; 15(37): 1-160.
9. Bailey JV, Murray E, Rait G, et al. Computer-based interventions for sexual health promotion: systematic review and metaanalyses. Int J STD AIDS 2012; 23(6): 408-413.
10. Lustria ML, Noar SM, Cortese J, et al. A meta-analysis of web-delivered tailored health behavior change interventions. J Health Commun 2013; 18(9): 1039-1069.
11. Kaltenthaler E, Brazier J, De NE, et al. Computerised cognitive behaviour therapy for depression and anxiety update: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2006; 10(33): iii, xi-iii,168.
12. Pal K, Eastwood SV, Michie S, et al. Computer-based diabetes self-management interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 3: CD008776.
13. Dutton WH, Blank G. Cultures of the internet: the internet in Britain. Oxford Internet Survey 2013 Report. Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, 2013.
14. Atherton H, Pappas Y, Heneghan C, Murray E. Experiences of using email for general practice consultations: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 2013; DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X674440.
15. Electronic health research centre awarded to Manchester [press release]. http://www.manchester.ac.uk/discover/news/article/?id=8574 (accessed 16 Jun 2014).
16. National Audit Office. The National Programme for IT in the NHS. London: TSO, 2006.
17. Mair F, May C, Murray E, et al. Understanding the implementation and integration of e-Health Services. Report for the NHS Service and Delivery R&D Organisation (NCCSDO). London: SDO, 2009.