Theories as bridges

Bridging Social Psychology: Benefits of Transdisciplinary Approaches

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 21-33

  Kruglanski, Arie W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904838383     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410616982     Document Type: Chapter

References (17)

1. Aronson, E., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1968). Experimentation in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1-79). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2. Deutsch, M., & Krauss, R. M. (1965). Theories in social psychology. New York: Basic Books.
3. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
4. Fiedler, K. (2004). Tools, toys, tenure, truisms, and theories: Some thoughts on the creative cycle of theory formation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 164-172.
5. Greenwald, A. G. (2004). The resting parrot, the dessert stomach, and other perfectly defensible theories. In J. Jost, M. R. Banaji, & D. A. Prentice (Eds.), The yin and yang of social cognition: Perspectives on the social psychology of thought systems. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 275-285.
6. Higgins, E. T. (1992). Increasingly complex but less interesting articles: Scientific progress or regulatory problem? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 489-492.
7. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sullaway, F. J. (2003a). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339-375.
8. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sullaway, F. J. (2003b). Exceptions that prove the rule: Using a theory of motivated social cognition to account for ideological incongruities and political anomalies, Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 383-393.
9. Kruglanski, A.W. (2001). That "vision thing": The state of theory in social and personality psychology at the edge of the new millennium. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 871-875.
10. Merton, R. K. (1957). Social theory and social structure (rev. ed.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
11. Miller, N., & Pedersen,W. C. (1999). Assessing process distinctiveness. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 150-155.
12. Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Harper. (Original work published as Logik der Forschung, 1935).
13. Popper, K. R. (1965). Conjectures and refutations. New York: Harper.
14. Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78.
15. Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., & Greenberg, J. (2003). In the wake of 9/11: The psychology of terror. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16. Reis, H. T., & Stiller, J. (1992). Publication trends in JPSP: A three decade review. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 465-472.
17. Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow database on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515-530.