An exploratory study of the W3C mailing list test collection for retrieval of emails with pro/con arguments

3rd Conference on Email and Anti-Spam - Proceedings, CEAS 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Wu, Yejun ^a   Oard, Douglas W ^a   Soboroff, Ian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC MAIL; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; INTERNET;

ENTERPRISE SEARCHES; EVALUATION RESULTS; EXPLORATORY STUDIES; INTER-ASSESSOR AGREEMENTS; MAILING LISTS; TEST COLLECTION;

TESTING;

EID: 84904814258     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Carmine Cesarano, Bonnie Dorr, Antonio Picariello, et al, 2005. OASYS: An opinion analysis system. AAAI 2005.
2. Nick Craswell, Arjen P. de Vries, and Ian Soboroff, 2005. Overview of the TREC-2005 Enterprise Track. TREC 2005, Gaithersburg, Maryland, November 15-18, 2005.
3. Sanjiv R. Das and Mike Y. Chen, 2006. Yahoo! for Amazon: sentiment extraction from small talk on the web. 8th Asia Pacific Finance Association Annual Conference (2001)
4. Kushal Dave, Steve Lawrence, and David M. Pennock, 2003. Mining the peanut gallery: opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. WWW2003, May 20-24, 2003, Budapest, Hungary.
5. Stephen D. Durbin, J. Neal Richter, and Doug Warner, 2003. A system for affective rating of texts. Proceedings of the KDD Workshop on Operational Text Classification Systems (OTC-3), 2003.
6. George Forman, 2003. An extensive empirical study of feature selection metrics for text classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 2003, 1289-1305.
7. Marti Hearst and Ray Larson, 1997. Relevance feedback, SIMS 202 Lecture 25. http://www.sims.berkeley.edu:8000/courses/is202/f98/Lecture25/sld001.htm
8. David Howell, 2002. Statistical methods for psychology, 5th Ed., Thomson Learning, p167.
9. Minqing Hu and Bing Liu, 2004. Mining and summarizing customer reviews. KDD'04, August 22-25, 2004, Seattle, Washington, USA.
10. David J. Ittner, David D. Lewis, and David D. Ahn, 1995. Text categorization of low quality images. Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval, Las Vegas, USA, 1995, p301-315.
11. Alistair Kennedy and Diana Inkpen, 2005. Sentiment classification of movie and product reviews using contextual valence shifters. FINEXIN 2005.
12. M.E. Lesk and G. Salton, 1969. Relevance assessments and retrieval system evaluation. Information Storage and Retrieval, 4, 1969, p343-359.
13. David D. Lewis, Yiming Yang, Tony G. Rose, and Fan Li, 2004. RCV1: a new benchmark collection for text categorization research. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 5, 2004, p361-397.
14. Jimmy Lin, Eileen Abels, Dina Demner-Fushman, Douglas W. Oard, Philip Wu, and Yejun Wu, 2005. A Menagerie of tracks at Maryland: HARD, Enterpise, QA, and Genomics, oh my! TREC 2005, Gaithersburg, Maryland, November 15-18, 2005.
15. Bing Liu, Minqing Hu, and Junsheng Cheng, 2005. Opinion observer: Analyzing and comparing opinions on the web. WWW 2005. May 10-14, 2005, Chiba, Japan.
16. Satoshi Morinaga, Kenji Yamanishi, et al, 2002. Mining product reputations on the web. Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-2002).
17. Tetsuya Nasukawa and Jeonghee Yi, 2003. Sentiment analysis: capturing favorability using natural language processing. K-CAP'03, October 23-25, 2003, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA.
18. Scott Nowson, Jon Oberlander, Alastair J. Gill, 2005. Weblogs, Genres, and Individual Differences. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Stresa, Italy, 2005.
19. Douglas W. Oard, Dagobert Soergel, and David Doermann, et al, 2004. Building an Information Retrieval Test Collection for Spontaneous Conversational Speech. SIGIR'04, July 25-29, 2004, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK.
20. Stuart Oskamp, 1991. Attitudes and opinions, 2nd Ed. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, p12.
21. Bo Pang, Lillian Lee, and Shivakumar Vaithyanathan, 2002. Thumbs up? sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. EMNLP 2002, 79-86
22. Bo Pang and Lillian Lee, 2005. See stars: Exploiting class relationships for sentiment categorization with respect to rating scales. ACL 2005.
23. Benjamin Piwowarski and Mounia Lalmas, 2004. Providing consistent and exhausitive relevance assessments for XML retrieval evaluation. CIKM'04, November 8-13, 2004, Washington, DC, USA.
24. J. J. Rocchio, 1971. Relevance feedback information retrieval. The Smart Retrieval SystemExperiments in Automatic Document Processing, G. Salton, Ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 313C323.
25. Mark Sanderson, Justin Zobel, 2005. Evaluation: Information retrieval system evaluation: effort, sensitivity, and reliability. SIGIR '05.
26. Fabrizio Sebastiani, 2002. Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 34, No. 1, March 2002, p1-47.
27. Peter Turney, 2002. Thumbs up or thumb down? semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. ACL-2002, 417-424.
28. Ellen M. Voorhees, 1998. Variations in relevance judgments and the measurement of retrieval effectiveness. SIGIR'98, Melbourne, Australia.
29. Ellen M. Voorhees, 2005. Overview of TREC 2005. TREC 2005, Gaithersburg, Maryland, November 15-18, 2005.
30. Theresa Wilson, Janyce Wiebe and Rebecca Hwa, 2004. Just how mad are you? Finding strong and weak opinion clauses. AAAI-2004
31. Theresa Wilson, Janyce Wiebe, and Paul Hoffmann, 2005. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. HLT-EMNLP 2005.
32. Yiming Yang and Xin Liu, 1999. A re-examination of text categorization methods. SIGIR'99.
33. Weizhong Zhu, Min Song, and Robert Allen, 2005. TREC 2005 Enterprise Track results from Drexel. TREC 2005, Gaithersburg, Maryland, November 15-18, 2005.