ECM hydrogel coating mitigates the chronic inflammatory response to polypropylene mesh

Biomaterials

Volumn 35, Issue 30, 2014, Pages 8585-8595

  Faulk, Denver M ^a,b   Londono, Ricardo ^b,c   Wolf, Matthew T ^a,b   Ranallo, Christian A ^a,b   Carruthers, Christopher A ^a,b   Wildemann, Justin D ^a,b   Dearth, Christopher L ^b,d   Badylak, Stephen F ^a,b,d  

^a University of Pittsburgh   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Coated surgical mesh; ECM (extracellular matrix); Foreign body response; Hydrogel; Polypropylene; Surgical mesh

Indexed keywords

COATINGS; COLLAGEN; DEPOSITION; HYDROGELS; MESH GENERATION; PLASTIC PRODUCTS; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); SURGERY; TISSUE;

CHRONIC INFLAMMATORY; ECM (EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX); EXTRACELLULAR MATRICES; FOREIGN BODY RESPONSE; INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE; SCAFFOLD MATERIALS; SURGICAL MESHES; SYNTHETIC MATERIALS;

POLYPROPYLENES;

COLLAGEN TYPE 1; BIOMATERIAL; COLLAGEN; HYDROGEL; POLYPROPYLENE;

ABDOMINAL WALL DEFECT; ABDOMINAL WALL MUSCULATURE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CHRONIC INFLAMMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; GIANT CELL; HYDROGEL; IMMUNE RESPONSE; IN VIVO STUDY; MACROPHAGE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; POLYPROPYLENE MESH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RAT; SURGICAL MESH; TISSUE REACTION; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ANIMAL; BIOMECHANICS; CHEMISTRY; CHRONIC DISEASE; DRUG EFFECTS; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; IMPLANT; INFLAMMATION; METABOLISM; PATHOLOGY; PHARMACOLOGY; SWINE;

RODENTIA;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; CHRONIC DISEASE; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; COLLAGEN; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; HYDROGEL; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; INFLAMMATION; MACROPHAGES; PHENOTYPE; POLYPROPYLENES; RATS; SURGICAL MESH; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 84904764846     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.06.057     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Shankaran V., Weber D.J., Reed R.L., Luchette F.A. A review of available prosthetics for ventral hernia repair. Ann Surg 2011, 253(1):16-26.
2. Cevasco M., Itani K.M. Ventral hernia repair with synthetic, composite, and biologic mesh: characteristics, indications, and infection profile. Surg Infect 2012, 13(4):209-215.
3. Cobb W.S., Kercher K.W., Heniford B.T. Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernias. Surg Clin North Am 2005, 85(1):91-103.
4. Klosterhalfen B., Junge K., Klinge U. The lightweight and large porous mesh concept for hernia repair. Expert Rev Med Devices 2005, 2(1):103-117.
5. Hernandez-Gascon B., Pena E., Melero H., Pascual G., Doblare M., Ginebra M.P., et al. Mechanical behaviour of synthetic surgical meshes: finite element simulation of the herniated abdominal wall. Acta Biomater 2011, 7(11):3905-3913.
6. Chu C.C., Welch L. Characterization of morphologic and mechanical properties of surgical mesh fabrics. J Biomed Mater Res 1985, 19(8):903-916.
7. Ozog Y., Konstantinovic M., Werbrouck E., De Ridder D., Mazza E., Deprest J. Persistence of polypropylene mesh anisotropy after implantation: an experimental study. BJOG 2011, 118(10):1180-1185.
8. Feola A., Barone W., Moalli P., Abramowitch S. Characterizing the ex vivo textile and structural properties of synthetic prolapse mesh products. Int Urogynecol J 2013, 24(4):559-564.
9. Bello Y.M., Falabella A.F., Eaglstein W.H. Tissue-engineered skin. Current status in wound healing. Am J Clin Dermatol 2001, 2(5):305-313.
10. Butler C.E., Langstein H.N., Kronowitz S.J. Pelvic, abdominal, and chest wall reconstruction with AlloDerm in patients at increased risk for mesh-related complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005, 116(5):1263-1275. discussion 76-77.
11. Franklin M.E., Gonzalez J.J., Glass J.L. Use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a prosthetic device for laparoscopic repair of hernias in contaminated fields: 2-year follow-up. Hernia 2004, 8(3):186-189.
12. Badylak S.F. The extracellular matrix as a biologic scaffold material. Biomaterials 2007, 28(25):3587-3593.
13. Hodde J., Hiles M. Constructive soft tissue remodelling with a biologic extracellular matrix graft: overview and review of the clinical literature. Acta Chir Belg 2007, 107(6):641-647.
14. Sikkink C.J., Zeebregts C.J., Reijnen M.M. Hyaluronan-based antiadhesive agents in abdominal surgery: applications, results, and mechanisms of action. Surg Technol Int 2007, 16:19-29.
15. Sicari B.M., Zhang L., Londono R., Badylak S.F. An assay to quantify chemotactic properties of degradation products from extracellular matrix. Methods Mol Biol 2014, 1202:103-110.
16. Tottey S., Corselli M., Jeffries E.M., Londono R., Peault B., Badylak S.F. Extracellular matrix degradation products and low-oxygen conditions enhance the regenerative potential of perivascular stem cells. Tissue Eng Part A 2011, 17(1-2):37-44.
17. Brennan E.P., Tang X.H., Stewart-Akers A.M., Gudas L.J., Badylak S.F. Chemoattractant activity of degradation products of fetal and adult skin extracellular matrix for keratinocyte progenitor cells. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2008, 2(8):491-498.
18. Reing J.E., Zhang L., Myers-Irvin J., Cordero K.E., Freytes D.O., Heber-Katz E., et al. Degradation products of extracellular matrix affect cell migration and proliferation. Tissue Eng Part A 2009, 15(3):605-614.
19. Brennan E.P., Reing J., Chew D., Myers-Irvin J.M., Young E.J., Badylak S.F. Antibacterial activity within degradation products of biological scaffolds composed of extracellular matrix. Tissue Eng 2006, 12(10):2949-2955.
20. Ramchandran R., Dhanabal M., Volk R., Waterman M.J., Segal M., Lu H., et al. Antiangiogenic activity of restin, NC10 domain of human collagen XV: comparison to endostatin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1999, 255(3):735-739.
21. Valentin J.E., Turner N.J., Gilbert T.W., Badylak S.F. Functional skeletal muscle formation with a biologic scaffold. Biomaterials 2010, 31(29):7475-7484.
22. Wolf M.T., Daly K.A., Brennan-Pierce E.P., Johnson S.A., Carruthers C.A., D'Amore A., et al. A hydrogel derived from decellularized dermal extracellular matrix. Biomaterials 2012, 33(29):7028-7038.
23. Badylak S.F., Freytes D.O., Gilbert T.W. Extracellular matrix as a biological scaffold material: structure and function. Acta Biomater 2009, 5(1):1-13.
24. Wolf M.T., Carruthers C.A., Dearth C.L., Crapo P.M., Huber A., Burnsed O.A., et al. Polypropylene surgical mesh coated with extracellular matrix mitigates the host foreign body response. J Biomed Mater Res A 2013, 102(1):234-246.
25. Valentin J.E., Badylak J.S., McCabe G.P., Badylak S.F. Extracellular matrix bioscaffolds for orthopaedic applications. A comparative histologic study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 2006, 88(12):2673-2686.
26. Brown B.N., Londono R., Tottey S., Zhang L., Kukla K.A., Wolf M.T., et al. Macrophage phenotype as a predictor of constructive remodeling following the implantation of biologically derived surgical mesh materials. Acta Biomater 2012, 8(3):978-987.
27. Freytes D.O., Martin J., Velankar S.S., Lee A.S., Badylak S.F. Preparation and rheological characterization of a gel form of the porcine urinary bladder matrix. Biomaterials 2008, 29(11):1630-1637.
28. Carpenter A.E., Jones T.R., Lamprecht M.R., Clarke C., Kang I.H., Friman O., et al. CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol 2006, 7(10):R100.
29. Whittaker P., Kloner R.A., Boughner D.R., Pickering J.G. Quantitative assessment of myocardial collagen with picrosirius red staining and circularly polarized light. Basic Res Cardiol 1994, 89(5):397-410.
30. Nadkarni S.K., Pierce M.C., Park B.H., de Boer J.F., Whittaker P., Bouma B.E., et al. Measurement of collagen and smooth muscle cell content in atherosclerotic plaques using polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007, 49(13):1474-1481.
31. Billiar K.L., Sacks M.S. Biaxial mechanical properties of the natural and glutaraldehyde treated aortic valve cusp-Part I: experimental results. J Biomech Eng 2000, 122(1):23-30.
32. Cobb W.S., Kercher K.W., Heniford B.T. The argument for lightweight polypropylene mesh in hernia repair. Surg Innov 2005, 12(1):63-69.
33. Klinge U., Klosterhalfen B., Muller M., Schumpelick V. Foreign body reaction to meshes used for the repair of abdominal wall hernias. Eur J Surg 1999, 165(7):665-673.
34. Leber G.E., Garb J.L., Alexander A.I., Reed W.P. Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias. Arch Surg 1998, 133(4):378-382.
35. Di Vita G., D'Agostino P., Patti R., Arcara M., Caruso G., Davi V., et al. Acute inflammatory response after inguinal and incisional hernia repair with implantation of polypropylene mesh of different size. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2005, 390(4):306-311.
36. Garcia-Urena M.A., Vega Ruiz V., Diaz Godoy A., Baez Perea J.M., Marin Gomez L.M., Carnero Hernandez F.J., et al. Differences in polypropylene shrinkage depending on mesh position in an experimental study. Am J Surg 2007, 193(4):538-542.
37. Costello C.R., Bachman S.L., Ramshaw B.J., Grant S.A. Materials characterization of explanted polypropylene hernia meshes. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007, 83(1):44-49.
38. Nieponice A., McGrath K., Qureshi I., Beckman E.J., Luketich J.D., Gilbert T.W., et al. An extracellular matrix scaffold for esophageal stricture prevention after circumferential EMR. Gastrointest Endosc 2009, 69(2):289-296.
39. Badylak S.F., Vorp D.A., Spievack A.R., Simmons-Byrd A., Hanke J., Freytes D.O., et al. Esophageal reconstruction with ECM and muscle tissue in a dog model. J Surg Res 2005, 128(1):87-97.
40. Badylak S., Meurling S., Chen M., Spievack A., Simmons-Byrd A. Resorbable bioscaffold for esophageal repair in a dog model. J Pediatr Surg 2000, 35(7):1097-1103.
41. Turner N.J., Badylak J.S., Weber D.J., Badylak S.F. Biologic scaffold remodeling in a dog model of complex musculoskeletal injury. J Surg Res 2012, 176(2):490-502.
42. Sicari B.M., Rubin J.P., Dearth C.L., Wolf M.T., Ambrosio F., Boninger M., et al. An acellular biologic scaffold promotes skeletal muscle formation in mice and humans with volumetric muscle loss. Sci Transl Med 2014, 6(234):234ra58.
43. Mase V.J., Hsu J.R., Wolf S.E., Wenke J.C., Baer D.G., Owens J., et al. Clinical application of an acellular biologic scaffold for surgical repair of a large, traumatic quadriceps femoris muscle defect. Orthopedics 2010, 33(7):511.
44. Brown B.N., Chung W.L., Pavlick M., Reppas S., Ochs M.W., Russell A.J., et al. Extracellular matrix as an inductive template for temporomandibular joint meniscus reconstruction: a pilot study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011, 69(12):e488-505.
45. Sicari B.M., Johnson S.A., Siu B.F., Crapo P.M., Daly K.A., Jiang H., et al. The effect of source animal age upon the in vivo remodeling characteristics of an extracellular matrix scaffold. Biomaterials 2012, 33(22):5524-5533.