Polypropylene surgical mesh coated with extracellular matrix mitigates the host foreign body response

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 102, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 234-246

  Wolf, Matthew T ^a,b   Carruthers, Christopher A ^a,b   Dearth, Christopher L ^b,c   Crapo, Peter M ^b,d   Huber, Alexander ^b   Burnsed, Olivia A ^e   Londono, Ricardo ^b   Johnson, Scott A ^b   Daly, Kerry A ^b   Stahl, Elizabeth C ^a,b   Freund, John M ^a,b   Medberry, Christopher J ^a,b   Carey, Lisa E ^a,b   Nieponice, Alejandro ^b,c   Amoroso, Nicholas J ^a,b   Badylak, Stephen F ^a,b,c  

^a University of Pittsburgh   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d C R BARD INC   (United States)

^e GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

coated surgical mesh; extracellular matrix; foreign body response; polypropylene; surgical mesh

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; COATINGS; COLLAGEN; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM; PLASTIC PRODUCTS; REPAIR; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS; SURGERY; TISSUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EXTRACELLULAR MATRICES; FOREIGN BODY GIANT CELLS; FOREIGN BODY RESPONSE; LOOSE CONNECTIVE TISSUES; MECHANICAL CHARACTERIZATIONS; NATURALLY OCCURRING; SURGICAL MESHES; SYNTHETIC MATERIALS;

POLYPROPYLENES;

COLLAGEN FIBER; POLYPROPYLENE; BIOMATERIAL;

ABDOMINAL WALL DEFECT; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTIBODY LABELING; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EX VIVO STUDY; EXPLANT; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FEMALE; FOREIGN BODY; GIANT CELL; HYDROGEL; IMMUNE RESPONSE; IN VIVO STUDY; KINEMATICS; MATERIAL COATING; NONHUMAN; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RAT; RIGIDITY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURGICAL MESH; TENSION; TISSUE REACTION; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; FOREIGN BODY REACTION; MATERIALS TESTING; METABOLISM; PATHOLOGY; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT;

ANIMALS; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FEMALE; FOREIGN-BODY REACTION; MATERIALS TESTING; POLYPROPYLENES; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SURGICAL MESH;

EID: 84888643991     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34671     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Usher FC,. Hernia repair with knitted polypropylene mesh. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1963; 117: 239-240.
2. George CD, Ellis H,. The results of incisional hernia repair: A twelve year review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1986; 68: 185-187.
3. Cobb WS, Kercher KW, Heniford BT,. The argument for lightweight polypropylene mesh in hernia repair. Surg Innov 2005; 12: 63-69.
4. Feola A, Barone W, Moalli P, Abramowitch S,. Characterizing the ex vivo textile and structural properties of synthetic prolapse mesh products. Int Urogynecol J 2013; 24: 559-564.
5. Klosterhalfen B, Junge K, Klinge U,. The lightweight and large porous mesh concept for hernia repair. Expert Rev Med Devices 2005; 2: 103-117.
6. Hernandez-Gascon B, Pena E, Melero H, Pascual G, Doblare M, Ginebra MP, Bellon JM, Calvo B,. Mechanical behaviour of synthetic surgical meshes: Finite element simulation of the herniated abdominal wall. Acta Biomater 2011; 7: 3905-3913.
7. Chu CC, Welch L,. Characterization of morphologic and mechanical properties of surgical mesh fabrics. J Biomed Mater Res 1985; 19: 903-916.
8. Ozog Y, Konstantinovic M, Werbrouck E, De Ridder D, Mazza E, Deprest J,. Persistence of polypropylene mesh anisotropy after implantation: an experimental study. BJOG 2011; 118: 1180-1185.
9. Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Muller M, Schumpelick V,. Foreign body reaction to meshes used for the repair of abdominal wall hernias. Eur J Surg 1999; 165: 665-673.
10. Leber GE, Garb JL, Alexander AI, Reed WP,. Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias. Arch Surg 1998; 133: 378-382.
11. Brown CN, Finch JG,. Which mesh for hernia repair? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2010; 92: 272-278.
12. Hollinsky C, Sandberg S, Koch T, Seidler S,. Biomechanical properties of lightweight versus heavyweight meshes for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and their impact on recurrence rates. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 2679-2685.
13. Weyhe D, Schmitz I, Belyaev O, Grabs R, Muller KM, Uhl W, Zumtobel V,. Experimental comparison of monofile light and heavy polypropylene meshes: Less weight does not mean less biological response. World J Surg 2006; 30: 1586-1591.
14. Conze J, Rosch R, Klinge U, Weiss C, Anurov M, Titkowa S, Oettinger A, Schumpelick V,. Polypropylene in the intra-abdominal position: influence of pore size and surface area. Hernia 2004; 8: 365-372.
15. Ansaloni L, Catena F, Coccolini F, Gazzotti F, D'Alessandro L, Pinna AD,. Inguinal hernia repair with porcine small intestine submucosa: 3-Year follow-up results of a randomized controlled trial of Lichtenstein's repair with polypropylene mesh versus Surgisis Inguinal Hernia Matrix. Am J Surg 2009; 198: 303-312.
16. Medberry CJ, Tottey S, Jiang H, Johnson SA, Badylak SF,. Resistance to infection of five different materials in a rat body wall model. J Surg Res 2010; 173: 38-44.
17. Holton LH III, Chung T, Silverman RP, Haerian H, Goldberg NH, Burrows WM, Gobin A, Butler CE,. Comparison of acellular dermal matrix and synthetic mesh for lateral chest wall reconstruction in a rabbit model. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119: 1238-1246.
18. Valentin JE, Turner NJ, Gilbert TW, Badylak SF,. Functional skeletal muscle formation with a biologic scaffold. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 7475-7484.
19. Hiles M, Record Ritchie RD, Altizer AM,. Are biologic grafts effective for hernia repair? A systematic review of the literature. Surg Innov 2009; 16: 26-37.
20. Valentin JE, Stewart-Akers AM, Gilbert TW, Badylak SF,. Macrophage participation in the degradation and remodeling of extracellular matrix scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A 2009; 15: 1687-1694.
21. Deeken CR, Melman L, Jenkins ED, Greco SC, Frisella MM, Matthews BD,. Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biologic meshes in a porcine model of ventral incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 2011; 212: 880-888.
22. Bellows CF, Wheatley BM, Moroz K, Rosales SC, Morici LA,. The effect of bacterial infection on the biomechanical properties of biological mesh in a rat model. PLoS One 2011; 6: e21228.
23. Zhang J, Wang GY, Xiao YP, Fan LY, Wang Q,. The biomechanical behavior and host response to porcine-derived small intestine submucosa, pericardium and dermal matrix acellular grafts in a rat abdominal defect model. Biomaterials 2011; 32: 7086-7095.
24. Badylak SF, Freytes DO, Gilbert TW,. Extracellular matrix as a biological scaffold material: Structure and function. Acta Biomater 2009; 5: 1-13.
25. Reing JE, Brown BN, Daly KA, Freund JM, Gilbert TW, Hsiong SX, Huber A, Kullas KE, Tottey S, Wolf MT, Badylak SF,. The effects of processing methods upon mechanical and biologic properties of porcine dermal extracellular matrix scaffolds. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 8626-8633.
26. Freytes DO, Martin J, Velankar SS, Lee AS, Badylak SF,. Preparation and rheological characterization of a gel form of the porcine urinary bladder matrix. Biomaterials 2008; 29: 1630-1637.
27. Wolf MT, Daly KA, Brennan-Pierce EP, Johnson SA, Carruthers CA, D'Amore A, Nagarkar SP, Velankar SS, Badylak SF,. A hydrogel derived from decellularized dermal extracellular matrix. Biomaterials 2012; 33: 7028-7038.
28. Rich L, Whittaker P,. Collagen and picrosirius red staining: a polarized light assesment of fibrillar hue and spatial distribution. Braz J morphol Sci 2005; 22: 97-104.
29. Nadkarni SK, Pierce MC, Park BH, de Boer JF, Whittaker P, Bouma BE, Bressner JE, Halpern E, Houser SL, Tearney GJ,. Measurement of collagen and smooth muscle cell content in atherosclerotic plaques using polarization- sensitive optical coherence tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 1474-1481.
30. Billiar KL, Sacks MS,. Biaxial mechanical properties of the natural and glutaraldehyde treated aortic valve cusp - Part I: Experimental results. J Biomech Eng 2000; 122: 23-30.
31. Sun W, Sacks MS, Scott MJ,. Effects of boundary conditions on the estimation of the planar biaxial mechanical properties of soft tissues. J Biomech Eng 2005; 127: 709-715.
32. Di Vita G, D'Agostino P, Patti R, Arcara M, Caruso G, Davi V, Cillari E,. Acute inflammatory response after inguinal and incisional hernia repair with implantation of polypropylene mesh of different size. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2005; 390: 306-311.
33. Garcia-Urena MA, Vega Ruiz V, Diaz Godoy A, Baez Perea JM, Marin Gomez LM, Carnero Hernandez FJ, Velasco Garcia MA,. Differences in polypropylene shrinkage depending on mesh position in an experimental study. Am J Surg 2007; 193: 538-542.
34. Costello CR, Bachman SL, Ramshaw BJ, Grant SA,. Materials characterization of explanted polypropylene hernia meshes. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007; 83: 44-49.
35. Brandt CJ, Kammer D, Fiebeler A, Klinge U,. Beneficial effects of hydrocortisone or spironolactone coating on foreign body response to mesh biomaterial in a mouse model. J Biomed Mater Res A 2011; 99: 335-343.
36. Harth KC, Rosen MJ, Thatiparti TR, Jacobs MR, Halaweish I, Bajaksouzian S, Furlan J, von Recum HA,. Antibiotic-releasing mesh coating to reduce prosthetic sepsis: An in vivo study. J Surg Res 2010; 163: 337-343.
37. Engelsman AF, Krom BP, Busscher HJ, van Dam GM, Ploeg RJ, van der Mei HC,. Antimicrobial effects of an NO-releasing poly(ethylene vinylacetate) coating on soft-tissue implants in vitro and in a murine model. Acta Biomater 2009; 5: 1905-1910.
38. Altinel Y, Ozturk E, Ozkaya G, Akyildiz EU, Ulcay Y, Ozguc H,. The effect of a chitosan coating on the adhesive potential and tensile strength of polypropylene meshes. Hernia 2012; 16: 709-716.
39. Schreinemacher MH, Emans PJ, Gijbels MJ, Greve JW, Beets GL, Bouvy ND,. Degradation of mesh coatings and intraperitoneal adhesion formation in an experimental model. Br J Surg 2009; 96: 305-313.
40. van't Riet M, Burger JW, Bonthuis F, Jeekel J, Bonjer HJ,. Prevention of adhesion formation to polypropylene mesh by collagen coating: a randomized controlled study in a rat model of ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 681-685.
41. Borrazzo EC, Belmont MF, Boffa D, Fowler DL,. Effect of prosthetic material on adhesion formation after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in a porcine model. Hernia 2004; 8: 108-112.
42. Fujino K, Kinoshita M, Saitoh A, Yano H, Nishikawa K, Fujie T, Iwaya K, Kakihara M, Takeoka S, Saitoh D, and others. Novel technique of overlaying a poly-L-lactic acid nanosheet for adhesion prophylaxis and fixation of intraperitoneal onlay polypropylene mesh in a rabbit model. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 3428-3436.
43. Pierce RA, Perrone JM, Nimeri A, Sexton JA, Walcutt J, Frisella MM, Matthews BD,. 120-Day comparative analysis of adhesion grade and quantity, mesh contraction, and tissue response to a novel omega-3 fatty acid bioabsorbable barrier macroporous mesh after intraperitoneal placement. Surg Innov 2009; 16: 46-54.
44. van 't Riet M, de Vos van Steenwijk PJ, Bonthuis F, Marquet RL, Steyerberg EW, Jeekel J, Bonjer HJ,. Prevention of adhesion to prosthetic mesh: comparison of different barriers using an incisional hernia model. Ann Surg 2003; 237: 123-128.
45. Maciver AH, McCall MD, Edgar RL, Thiesen AL, Bigam DL, Churchill TA, Shapiro AM,. Sirolimus drug-eluting, hydrogel-impregnated polypropylene mesh reduces intra-abdominal adhesion formation in a mouse model. Surgery 2011; 150: 907-915.
46. Takaoka R, Hikasa Y, Tabata Y,. Vascularization around poly(tetrafluoroethylene) mesh with coating of gelatin hydrogel incorporating basic fibroblast growth factor. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2009; 20: 1483-1494.
47. Badiou W, Lavigne JP, Bousquet PJ, O'Callaghan D, Mares P, de Tayrac R,. In vitro and in vivo assessment of silver-coated polypropylene mesh to prevent infection in a rat model. Int Urogynecol J 2011; 22: 265-272.
48. Junge K, Rosch R, Klinge U, Saklak M, Klosterhalfen B, Peiper C, Schumpelick V,. Titanium coating of a polypropylene mesh for hernia repair: Effect on biocompatibilty. Hernia 2005; 9: 115-119.
49. Brown BN, Londono R, Tottey S, Zhang L, Kukla KA, Wolf MT, Daly KA, Reing JE, Badylak SF,. Macrophage phenotype as a predictor of constructive remodeling following the implantation of biologically derived surgical mesh materials. Acta Biomater 2012; 8: 978-987.
50. DeQuach JA, Lin JE, Cam C, Hu D, Salvatore MA, Sheikh F, Christman KL,. Injectable skeletal muscle matrix hydrogel promotes neovascularization and muscle cell infiltration in a hindlimb ischemia model. Eur Cell Mater 2012; 23: 400-412.
51. Agrawal V, Johnson SA, Reing J, Zhang L, Tottey S, Wang G, Hirschi KK, Braunhut S, Gudas LJ, Badylak SF,. Epimorphic regeneration approach to tissue replacement in adult mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107: 3351-3355.
52. Badylak SF, Valentin JE, Ravindra AK, McCabe GP, Stewart-Akers AM,. Macrophage phenotype as a determinant of biologic scaffold remodeling. Tissue Eng Part A 2008; 14: 1835-1842.
53. Singelyn JM, Sundaramurthy P, Johnson TD, Schup-Magoffin PJ, Hu DP, Faulk DM, Wang J, Mayle KM, Bartels K, Salvatore M, and others. Catheter-deliverable hydrogel derived from decellularized ventricular extracellular matrix increases endogenous cardiomyocytes and preserves cardiac function post-myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59: 751-763.
54. Weyhe D, Belyaev O, Buettner G, Mros K, Mueller C, Meurer K, Papapostolou G, Uhl W,. In vitro comparison of three different mesh constructions. ANZ J Surg 2008; 78: 55-60.
55. Weyhe D, Hoffmann P, Belyaev O, Mros K, Muller C, Uhl W, Schmitz F,. The role of TGF-beta1 as a determinant of foreign body reaction to alloplastic materials in rat fibroblast cultures: Comparison of different commercially available polypropylene meshes for hernia repair. Regul Pept 2007; 138: 10-14.
56. Muellner T, Kwasny O, Loehnert V, Mallinger R, Unfried G, Schabus R, Plenk H Jr,. Light and electron microscopic study of stress-shielding effects on rat patellar tendon. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2001; 121: 561-565.