An ensemble pansharpening approach for finer-scale mapping of sugarcane with Landsat 8 imagery

International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 218-225

  Johnson, Brian A ^a   Scheyvens, Henry ^a   Shivakoti, Binaya R ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES   (Japan)

Author keywords

IHS; Image fusion; Landsat 8; Pansharpening; Sugarcane mapping; SVM

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ENSEMBLE FORECASTING; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; LANDSAT; MULTISPECTRAL IMAGE; PIXEL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SATELLITE IMAGERY; WAVELET;

EID: 84904753263     PISSN: 15698432     EISSN: 1872826X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2014.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Aiazzi, B., Baronti, S., Selva, M., 2007. Improving component substitution pansharpening through multivariate regression of MS + Pan data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 45,3230-3239.
2. Amolins, K., Zhang, Y., Dare, P., 2007. Wavelet based image fusion techniques-an introduction, review and comparison. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 62, 249-263, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2007.05.009.
3. Amro, I., Mateos,J., Vega, M., Molina, R., Katsaggelos, A.K., 2011. A survey of classical methods and new trends in pansharpening of multispectral images. EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process. 79,1-22.
4. Bruzzone, L, Carlin, L, 2006. A multilevel context-based system for classification of very high spatial resolution images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 44, 2587-2600.
5. Burges, C, 1998. Atutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2, 121-167.
6. Colditz, R.R., Wehrmann, T., Bachmann, M., Steinnocher, K., Schmidt, M., Strunz, G., Dech, S., 2006. Influence of image fusion approaches on classification accuracy: a case study. Int. J. Remote Sens. 27,3311-3335.
7. Cortes, C, Vapnik, V., 1995. Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn. 20, 273-297.
8. Gillespie, A.R., Kahle,A.B., Walker, R.E., 1987. Color enhancement of highly correlated images II. Channel ratio and chromaticity transformation techniques. Remote Sens. Environ. 22,343-365.
9. González-Audícana, M., Otazu, X., Fors, O., Alvarez-Mozos, J., 2006. A low computational-cost method to fuse IKONOS images using the spectral response function of its sensors. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 44,1683-1691.
10. Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.H., 2009. The WEKAdata mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explor. 11,10-18.
11. Johnson, B., 2014. Effects of pansharpening on vegetation indices. ISPRS Int. J. Geo- Inf. 3, 507-522.
12. Johnson, B.A., 2013. High resolution urban land cover classification using a competitive multi-scale object-based approach. Remote Sens. Lett. 4, 131-140, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2150704X.2012.705440.
13. Johnson, BA, Tateishi, R., Hoan, N.T., 2012. Satellite image pansharpening using a hybrid approach for object-based image analysis. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 1, 228-241.
14. Johnson, B.A., Tateishi, R., Hoan, N.T., 2013. A hybrid pansharpening approach and multiscale object-based image analysis for mapping diseased pine and oak trees. Int. J. Remote Sens. 34, 6969-6982.
15. Kavzoglu, T., Colkesen, I., 2009. A kernel functions analysis for support vector machines for land cover classification. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 11,352-359.
16. Melgani, F., Bruzzone, L, 2004. Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 42,1778-1790.
17. Mountrakis, G., Im, J., Ogole, C, 2011. Support vector machines in remote sensing: a review. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 66, 247-259, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.11.001.
18. Nunez, J., Otazu, X., Fors, O., Prades, A., Pala, V., Arbiol, R., 1999. Multiresolutionbased image fusion with additive wavelet decomposition. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 37,1204-1211.
19. Pal, M., Foody, G.M., 2010. Feature selection for classification of hyperspectral data by SVM. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 48, 2297-2307.
20. Palsson, F., Sveinsson,J.R., Benediktsson,J.A., Aanaes, H., 2012. Classification of pansharpened urban satellite images. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 5, 281-297.
21. Shackelford, A.K., Davis, C.H., 2003. A hierarchical fuzzy classification approach for high-resolution multispectral data over urban areas. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 41, 1920-1932.
22. Tu, T.M., Huang, P.S., Hung, C.L., Chang, C.P., 2004. A fast Intensity-Hue-Saturation fusion technique with spectral adjustment for IKONOS imagery. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 1, 309-312.
23. Tu, T.M., Lee, Y.-C, Chang, C.P., Huang, P.S., 2005. Adjustable Intensity-Hue- Saturation and Brovey transform fusion technique for IKONOS/QuickBird imagery. Opt. Eng. 44,116201, http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.2124871.
24. Tu,T.-M., Su, S.-C, Shyu, H.-C, Huang, P.S., 2001. A new look at IHS-like image fusion methods. Inf. Fusion 2,177-186.
25. Wang, Z., Ziou, D., Armenakis, C, Li, D., Li, Q., 2005. A comparative analysis of image fusion methods. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 43,1391-1402.
26. Witten, I.H., Frank, E., Hall, M., 2011. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 3rd ed. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, USA.