Debating DSM-5: Diagnosis and the sociology of critique

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 40, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 521-525

  Pickersgill, Martyn D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MENTAL DISORDERS; PSYCHIATRY; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; PSYCHOMETRY; SOCIOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; MENTAL DISORDERS; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; PSYCHIATRY; PSYCHOMETRICS; SOCIOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84904693208     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: 14734257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101762     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Goldstein Jutel A. Putting a name to it: Diagnosis in contemporary society. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011.
2. Conrad P, Barker KK. The social construction of illness: key insights and policy omplications. J Health Soc Behav 2010;51 Suppl:S67-79.
3. Hacking I. Historical ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.
4. Kitankaka J. Depression in Japan: Psychiatric cures for a society in distress. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.
5. Davis EA. Bad souls: Madness and responsibility in modern Greece. Durham: Duke University Press, 2012.
6. Ehrenberg A. The weariness of the self: Diagnosing the history of depression in the contemporary age. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queens University Press, 2010.
7. Luhrmann TM. Of two minds: The growing disorder in American psychiatry. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2000.
8. Martin E. Bipolar expeditions: Mania and depression in American culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.
9. Silverman C. Understanding autism: Parents, doctors, and the history of a disorder. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.
10. Pickersgill M. How personality became treatable: the mutual constitution of clinical knowledge and mental health law. Soc Stud Sci 2013;43:30-53.
11. Pickersgill MD. Sociotechnical innovation in mental health: articulating complexity. In: Flear ML, Farrell A, Hervey TK, Murphy T. eds. European Law and New Health Technologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013:323-42.
12. Kupfer DJ, First MB, Regier AA. eds. A research agenda for DSM-V. Washington, DC: APA Press, 2002.
13. Ledford H. Psychiatry manual revisions spark row. Nature 2009;460:445.
14. Spitzer RL. DSM-V transparency: fact or rhetoric? Psychiatric Times, 2009. http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/articles/dsm-v-transparency-fact-or-rhetoric (accessed 25 Jun 2013).
15. Holden C. APA seeks to overhaul personality disorder diagnoses. Science 2010;327:1314.
16. Conrad P. The medicalization of society: On the transformation of human conditions into treatable disorders. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007.
17. Rose N. Beyond medicalisation. The Lancet 2007;369:700-2.
18. Wykes Y, Callard F. Diagnosis, diagnosis, diagnosis: towards DSM-5. J Ment Health Nurs 2010;19:301-4.
19. Frances A. The first draft of DSM-V if accepted will fan the flames of false positive diagnoses. BMJ 2010;340:492.
20. Frances A. Essentials of psychiatric diagnosis: Responding to the challenge of DSM-5. New York: Guildford Press, 2013.
21. Frances A. Saving normal: An insider's revolt against out-of-control psychiatric diagnosis, DSM-5, big pharma, and the medicalization of ordinary life. New York: William Morrow & Company, 2013.
22. Horwitz A, Wakefield JC. The loss of sadness: How psychiatry turned normal sorrow into depressive disorder. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
23. Hazen EP, McDougle CJ, Volkmar FR. Changes in the diagnostic criteria for autism in DSM-5: controversies and concerns. J Clin Psychiatry 2013;74:739-40.
24. Wakefield JC. The DSM-5 debate over the bereavement exclusion: psychiatric diagnosis and the future of empirically supported treatment. Clin Psychol Rev 2013;33:825-45.
25. Pickersgill M. What is psychiatry? Co-producing complexity in mental health. Soc Theory Health 2012;10:328-47.
26. Jutel A. Sociology of diagnosis: a preliminary review. Soc Health Illness 2009;31:278-99., 291.
27. Williams SJ, Martin P, Gabe J. The pharmaceuticalisation of society? A framework for analysis. Soc Health Illness 2011;33:710-25.
28. Insel TR. Transforming diagnosis [blog]. 29 Apr. 2013. http://www.nimh.nih.gov/ about/director/2013/transforming-diagnosis.shtml (accessed 27 Jun 2013).
29. NIMH. Research Domain Criteria (RDoC). 2013. http://www.nimh.nih.gov/ research-funding/rdoc/index.shtml (accessed 27 Jun 13).
30. Rose N. The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.
31. Clarke AE, Mamo L, Fosket JR, Fishman JR, Shim JK, eds. Biomedicalization: Technoscience, health, and illness in the U.S. Durham: Duke University, 2010.
32. Miller G. Beyond DSM: seeking a brain-based classification of mental illness. Science 2010;327:1437.
33. Insel TR, Lieberman JA. DSM-5 and RDoC: shared interests. 13 May 2013. http:// www.nimh.nih.gov/news/science-news/2013/dsm-5-and-rdoc-shared-interests.shtml (accessed 27 Jun 2013).
34. Whooley O. Diagnostic ambivalence: psychiatric workarounds and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Soc Health Illness 2010;32:452-69.
35. Szmukler G. When psychiatric diagnosis becomes an overworked tool. J Med Ethics 2014;40:517-20.
36. Callard F. Psychiatric diagnosis: the indispensability of ambivalence. J Med Ethics 2014;40:526-30.
37. Pickersgill MD. From implications to dimensions: science, medicine and ethics in society. Health Care Anal 2013;21:31-42.