Upper Washita river experimental watersheds: Physiography data

Journal of Environmental Quality

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1298-1309

  Moriasi, Daniel N ^a   Starks, Patrick J ^a   Steiner, Jean L ^a   Guzman, Jorge A ^a   Allen, Paul B ^b   Naney, James W ^b  

^a USDA ARS GRAZINGLANDS RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL STABILITY; COMPLEX NETWORKS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; GEOMORPHOLOGY; RESEARCH; RIVERS;

CHEMICAL TRANSPORT; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; EXPERIMENTAL WATERSHEDS; GEOLOGIC FORMATIONS; LITTLE WASHITA RIVER EXPERIMENTAL WATERSHEDS; OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY; RAPID GEOMORPHIC ASSESSMENTS; RESEARCH APPLICATIONS;

WATERSHEDS;

AGRICULTURAL LAND; ARTICLE; BULK DENSITY; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; LAND USE; RIVER; SOIL EROSION; SOIL MANAGEMENT; SOIL PROPERTY; SOIL TEXTURE; WATER QUALITY; WATER SUPPLY; WATERSHED;

EID: 84904689425     PISSN: 00472425     EISSN: 15372537     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2013.08.0337     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Allen, P.B., and J.W. Naney. 1991. Hydrology of the Little Washita River watershed, Oklahoma. ARS-90. http://www.ars.usda.gov/SP2UserFiles/Place/62180520/ars-90.pdf (accessed 27 Nov. 2012).
2. Andrews, S.S., D.L. Karlen, and C.A. Cambardella. 2004. The soil management assessment framework: A quantitative soil quality evaluation method. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68:1945-1962. doi:10.2136/sssaj2004.1945.
3. Arnold, J.G., R. Srinivasan, R.S. Muttiah, and J.R. Williams. 1998. Large-area hydrologic modeling and assessment: I. Model development. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 34:73-89. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x.
4. Castellano, M.J., D.B. Lewis, and J.P. Kaye. 2013. Response of soil nitrogen retention to the interactive effects of soil texture, hydrology, and organic matter. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 118:280-290. doi:10.1002/jgrg.20015.
5. Cotter, A.S., I. Chaubey, T.A. Costello, T.S. Soerens, and M.A. Nelson. 2003. Water quality model output uncertainty as affected by spatial resolution of input data. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 39:977-986. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2003.tb04420.x.
6. Davis, L.V. 1955. Geology and ground water resources of Grady and northern Stephens counties, Oklahoma. Bull. 73. Oklahoma Geol. Surv., Norman.
7. Franklin, D.H., J. L. Steiner, S.E. Duke, D. N. Moriasi, and P. J. Starks. 2013. Spatial and temporal considerations for phosphorus in streams of the Fort Cobb watershed, USA. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 49:908-922. doi:10.1111/jawr.12048.
8. Guzman, J.A., D.N. Moriasi, P.H. Gowda, J.L. Steiner, J.G. Arnold, R. Srinivasan, and P.J. Starks. 2013a. An integrated hydrologic modeling framework for coupling SWAT with MODFLOW. In: D. Kiniry et al., editors, Proceedings of the International SWAT Conference, New Delhi, India. 16-20 July 2012. TR-436. Texas Water Resour. Inst., College Station. p. 446-455.
9. Guzman, J.A., D.N. Moriasi, M.L. Chu, P.J. Starks, J.L. Steiner, and P.H. Gowda. 2013b. A Tool for mapping and spatiotemporal analysis of hydrological data. Environ. Modell. Softw. 48:163-170. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.06.014.
10. Guzman, J.A., G.A. Fox, and J. Payne. 2010. Surface runoff transport of Escherichia coli after poultry litter application on pastureland. Trans. ASABE 53:779-786. doi:10.13031/2013.30083.
11. Hart, D.L., Jr. 1965. Ground water in the alluvial deposits: Washita Basin, Clinton to Anadarko, Oklahoma. Bull. 26. Oklahoma Water Resour. Board, Oklahoma City.
12. Hyndman, D.W., F.D. Day-Lewis, and K. Singha, editors. 2007. Subsurface hydrology: Data integration for properties and processes. Geophys. Monogr. Ser. 171. Am. Geophys. Union, Washington, DC.
13. Johanson, R.C., J.C. Imhoff, J.L. Little, and A.S. Donigian. 1984. User's manual for the Hydrological Simulation Program (HSPF). USEPA, Athens, GA.
14. Kim, H.N., and S.L. Walker. 2009. Escherichia coli transport in porous media: Influence of cell strain, solution chemistry, and temperature. Colloid Surf. B 71:160-167. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.02.002.
15. Li, Z., Q. Zhu, and C. Gold. 2005. Digital terrain modeling: Principles and methodology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
16. Moriasi, D.N., J.L. Steiner, and J.G. Arnold. 2011. Sediment measurement and transport modeling: Impact of riparian and filter strip buffers. J. Environ. Qual. 40:807-814. doi:10.2134/jeq2010.0066.
17. Moriasi, D.N., and P.J. Starks. 2010. Effects of the resolution of soil dataset and precipitation dataset on SWAT2005 streamflow calibration parameters and simulation accuracy. J. Soil Water Conserv. 65:63-78. doi:10.2489/jswc.65.2.63.
18. Musgrave, G.W. 1955. How much of the rain enters the soil? In: Water. USDA Yearbook. U.S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC. p. 151-159.
19. NRCS. 1994. State Soil Geographic (STATSGO) Data Base. NRCS, Fort Worth, TX. http://water.usgs.gov/lookup/getspatial?ussoils.
20. NRCS. 1995. Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Data Base: Data use information. Natl. Soil Surv. Ctr., Lincoln, NE.
21. NRCS. 1996. National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. U.S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC.
22. NRCS. 2013. U.S. general soil map (STATSGO2). [Database.] NRCS, Washington, DC. http://water.usgs.gov/lookup/getspatial?ussoils (accessed 30 Oct. 2013).
23. Oklahoma Climatology Survey. 2005. Caddo County climate summary. Oklahoma Clim. Surv., Norman. http://climate.mesonet.org/county_climate/Products/QuickFacts/caddo.pdf.
24. Puckett, L.J., and W.B. Hughes. 2005. Transport and fate of nitrate and pesticides: Hydrogeology and riparian zone processes. J. Environ. Qual. 34:2278-2292. doi:10.2134/jeq2005.0109.
25. Reeves, F. 1921. Geology of the Cement oil field, Caddo, County, Okla. U.S. Geol. Surv. Bull. 726:41-85.
26. Soil Conservation Service. 1972. Estimation of direct runoff from storm rainfall. In: National Engineering Handbook. Sect. 4. U.S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC. p. 10.1-10.24.
27. Simon, A., and L. Klimetz. 2008. Relative magnitudes and sources of sediment in benchmark watersheds of the Conservation Effects Assessment Project. J. Soil Water Conserv. 63:504-522. doi:10.2489/jswc.63.6.504.
28. Simon, A., and M. Rinaldi. 2006. Disturbance, stream incision, and channel evolution: The roles of excess transport capacity and boundary materials in controlling channel response. Geomorphology 79:361-383. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.06.037.
29. Starks, P.J., J.A. Daniel, D.N. Moriasi, and J.L. Steiner. 2011. Soils, crop production, and geology in the Fort Cobb Reservoir watershed, southwestern Oklahoma. In: C.J. Becker, editor, Assessment of conservation practices in the Fort Cobb Reservoir watershed, southwestern Oklahoma. Sci. Invest. Rep. 2010-5257. USGS, Reston, VA.
30. Starks, P.J., and D.N. Moriasi. 2009. Spatial resolution effect of precipitation data on SWAT calibration and performance: Implications for CEAP. Trans. ASABE 52:1171-1180. doi:10.13031/2013.27792.
31. Starks, P.J., J.L. Steiner, and A.J. Stern. 2014. Upper Washita River experimental watersheds: Land cover data sets (1974-2007) for two southwestern Oklahoma agricultural watersheds. J. Environ. Qual. 43 doi:10.2134/jeq2013.07.0292.
32. Steiner, J.L., P.J. Starks, J.D. Garbrecht, D.N. Moriasi, X. Zhang, J.M. Schneider, J.A. Guzman, and E. Osei. 2014. The Upper Washita River Experimental Watersheds, Oklahoma, USA. J. Environ. Qual. 43 doi:10.2134/jeq2014.05.0229.
33. Steiner, J.L., P.J. Starks, J.A. Daniel, J.D. Garbrecht, D. Moriasi, S. McIntyre, and J. Chen. 2008. Environmental effects of agricultural conservation: A framework for research in two watersheds in Oklahoma's Upper Washita River basin. J. Soil Water Conserv. 63:443-452. doi:10.2489/jswc.63.6.443.
34. Tanaka, H.H., and L.V. Davis. 1963. Ground-water resources of the Rush Springs sandstone in Caddo County area, Oklahoma. Circ. 63. Oklahoma Geol. Surv., Norman.
35. Teegavarapu, R., C. Viswanathan, and L. Ormsbee. 2006. Effect of digital elevation model (DEM) resolution on the hydrological and water quality modeling. In: R. Graham, editor, World Environmental and Water Resource Congress, Omaha, NE. 21-15 May 2006. [CD-ROM] Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., Reston, VA. doi:10.1061/40856(200)216.
36. Van Liew, M.W., C.H. Green, and P.J. Starks. 2007. Unit source area data: Can it make a difference in calibrating the hydrologic response for watershed-scale modeling? J. Soil Water Conserv. 62:162-170.
37. Van Liew, M.W., J.G. Arnold, and J.D. Garbrecht. 2003a. Hydrologic simulation on agricultural watersheds: Choosing between two models. Trans. ASAE 46:1539-1551. doi:10.13031/2013.15643.
38. Van Liew, M.W., J.D. Garbrecht, and J.G. Arnold. 2003b. Simulation of the impacts of flood retarding structures on streamflow for a watershed in southwestern Oklahoma under dry, average, and wet climatic conditions. J. Soil Water Conserv. 58:340-348.
39. Winchell, M., R. Srinivasan, M. DiLuzio, and J. Arnold. 2007 ArcSWAT interface for SWAT2005 user's guide. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Temple. http://www.geology.wmich. edu/sultan/5350/Labs/ArcSWAT_Documentation.pdf (accessed 18 June 2014).