Towards a sensorimotor WordNetSM: Closing the semantic gap

GWC 2006: 3rd International Global WordNet Conference, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 171-176

  Guerra Filho, Gutemberg ^a   Aloimonos, Yiannis ^a  

^a Institute of Advanced Computer Science   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS; SPEECH RECOGNITION;

FORMAL APPROACH; GRAMMATICAL STRUCTURE; GROUNDING LANGUAGE; HUMAN ACTIONS; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; HUMAN BODIES; HUMAN MOVEMENTS; PRIMITIVE WORD;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 84904680872     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Bailey D., Chang N., Feldman J., and Narayanan S. (1997) Extending Embodied lexical development. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
2. Basili R., Pazienza M., and Velardi, P. (1996) An empirical symbolic approach to natural language processing. Artificial Intelligence Journal, 85/1/2, pp. 59-99.
3. Fellbaum C. (Ed.) (1998) WordNet: An Electronic lexical Database. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Gangemi A., Navigli R., and Velardi P. (2003) The OntoWordNet project: extension and acclimatization of conceptual relations in WordNet. In Proceedings of International Conference on Ontologies, Databases and Applications of Semantics.
5. Gibson J. (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.
6. Guerra-Filho G. (2005) Optical Motion Capture: Theory and Implementation. To appear in the Brazilian Computing Society Revista de Informática Teórica e Aplicada.
7. Guerra-Filho G., Fermüller C., and Aloimonos Y. (2005) Discovering a language for human activity. To appear in Proceedings of AAAI 2005 Fall Symposium: "From Reactive to Anticipatory Cognitive Embodied Systems".
8. Levin B. (1993) English Verb Classes and Alternations. Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL.
9. Harabagiu S., Miller G., and Moldovan D. (1999)WordNet 2 - A morphologically and semantically enhanced resource. In Proceedings of SIGLEX-99, pp. 1-8.
10. Harnard S. (1990) The symbol grounding problem. Physica, D42, pp. 335-346.
11. Harrow A. (1972) A Taxonomy of the Psychomotor Domain: A Guide for Developing Behavioral Objectives. David McKay Company, Inc., New York, NY.
12. Joanis E. and Stevenson S. (2003) A General Feature Space for Automatic Verb Classification. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the European ACL, pp. 163-170.
13. Merlo P. and Stevenson S. (2001) Automatic Verb Classification Based on Statistical Distributions of Argument Structure. Computational Linguistics, 27/3, pp. 373-408.
14. Miller G., Beckwith R., Fellbaum C., Gross D., and Miller K. (1990) Five papers on Wordnet. International Journal of Lexicography, 3/4.
15. Miller G. and Fellbaum C. (1991) Semantic networks of English. Cognition, 41/1/3, pp. 197-229.
16. Roy D. (2005) Semiotic schemas: a framework for grounding language in action and perception. To appear in Artificial Intelligence.
17. Schulteim Walde S. and Brew C. (2002) Inducing German Semantic Verb Classes from Purely Syntatic Subcategorisation Information. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), Philadelphia, pp. 223-230.
18. Siskind J. (2001) Grounding the lexical semantics of verbs in visual perception using force dynamics and event logic. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 15, pp. 31-90.
19. Vázquez G., Fernández A., Castellón I., and Martí M. (2000) Clasificación Verbal: Alternancias de Diátesis. Number 3 in Quaderns de Sintagma, Universitat de Lleida.