Discovering a language for human activity

AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn FS-05-05, Issue , 2005, Pages 70-77

  Guerra Filho, Gutemberg ^a   Fermuller, Cornelia ^a   Aloimonos, Yiannis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN ACTIVITY LANGUAGE (HAL); MOTION CAPTURE SYSTEM; MOTOR SUBSYSTEM;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; FORMAL LANGUAGES; MORPHOLOGY; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

SENSORY PERCEPTION;

EID: 33645986666     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Boyd, J. and Little, J. 1997. Global versus structured interpretation of motion: moving light displays. In Proceedings of IEEE Nonrigid and Articulated Motion Workshop at CVPR 97, 18-25.
2. Browman, C. and Goldstein, L. 1985. Dynamic modeling of phonetic structure. In V. Fromkin (ed.), Phonetic linguistics. New York: Academic Press.
3. Browman, C. and Goldstein, L. 1990. Gestural specification using dynamically-defined articulatory structures. Journal of Phonetics 18: 299-320.
4. Buccino, G., Lui, F., Canessa, N., Patteri, I., Lagravinese, G., Benuzzi, F., Porro, CA., and Rizzolatti, G. 2004. Neural circuits involved in the recognition of actions performed by nonconspecifics: an FMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16: 114-126.
5. Clark, W. 1963. The antecedents of man. New York: Harper and Row.
6. Deane, P. 1991. Syntax and the brain: neurological evidence for the spatialization of form hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics 2(4): 361-367.
7. Dell, C. 1971. A primer for movement description. Dance Notation Bureau, Inc., New York.
8. th International Symposium on Sign Language Research, Helsinki.
9. Eshkol, N. 1980. 50 Lessons By Dr. Moshe Feldenkrais. Tel-Aviv: The Movement Notation Society.
10. Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., and Rizzolatti, G. 1996. Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 119(2): 593-609.
11. Glenberg, A. and Kaschak, M. 2002. Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9(3): 558-565.
12. Hutchinson, A. 1977. Labanotation. Theatre Arts Books.
13. Kelso, J., Saltzman, E., and Tuller, B. 1986. The dynamical perspective on speech production: data and theory. Journal of Phonetics 14: 29-59.
14. Kien, J. 1992. Temporal segmentation in the motor system, symbolization, and the evolution of language. Annual meeting of the Language Origin Society, Cambridge, UK.
15. Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press.
16. Lidell, S. 1984. THINK and BELIEVE: sequentiality in American Sign Language. Language 60: 372-399.
17. Nishitani, N., Schurmann, M., Amunts, K., and Hari, R. 2005. Broca's region: from action to language. Physiology 20: 60-69.
18. nd Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research. Gallaudet University, Washington DC.
19. Perrett, D., Harries, M., Bevan, R., Thomas, S., Benson, P., Mistlin, A., Chitty, A., Hietanen, J., and Ortega, J. 1989. Frameworks of analysis for the neural representation of animate objects and actions. Journal of Experimental Biology 146:87-113.
20. Sandler, W. 1986. The spreading hand autosegment of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 50: 1-28.
21. Studdert-Kennedy, M. 1987. The phoneme as a perceptuomotor structure. In D. Allport (ed.), Language perception and production: relationships between listening, speaking, reading and writing. London: Academic Press.
22. Wilbur, R. 1987. American Sign Language: linguistic and applied dimensions. Boston: College Hill Press.