Rheological behaviour of reconstructed skin

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials

Volumn 37, Issue , 2014, Pages 251-263

  Pailler Mattei, C ^a,b   Laquieze L ^a   Debret, R ^c   Tupin, S ^a   Aimond, G ^c   Sommer, P ^c   Zahouani, H ^a  

^a LABORATOIRE DE TRIBOLOGIE ET DYNAMIQUE DES SYSTÈMES   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

Reconstructed tissue; Relaxation tests; Rheological model; Skin fibres; Viscoelasticity

Indexed keywords

CELL CULTURE; MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; TISSUE; VISCOELASTICITY;

BIOLOGICAL STRUCTURES; FUNCTIONAL PROPERTIES; MECHANICAL MEASUREMENTS; RELAXATION TEST; RHEOLOGICAL MODELING; SPHERICAL INDENTATIONS; TIME-DEPENDENT BEHAVIOUR; VISCO-ELASTIC MATERIAL;

SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DERMIS; FLOW KINETICS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN; SKIN CELL; SKIN RECONSTRUCTION; SKIN SURGERY; SOFT TISSUE; VISCOELASTICITY; ADULT; CYTOLOGY; ELASTICITY; FIBROBLAST; KERATINOCYTE; MECHANICS; TIME; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLD; VISCOSITY; WEIGHT BEARING;

ADULT; DERMIS; ELASTICITY; FIBROBLASTS; HUMANS; KERATINOCYTES; MECHANICAL PROCESSES; RHEOLOGY; SKIN; TIME FACTORS; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS; VISCOSITY; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 84904627811     PISSN: 17516161     EISSN: 18780180     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.05.030     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Anssari-Benam A., Bader D.L., Screen H.R.C. Anisotropic time-dependant behaviour of the aortic valve. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2011, 4:1603-1610.
2. Black A.F., Bouez C., Perrier E., Schlotmann K., Chapuis F., Damour O. Optimization and characterization of an engineered human skin equivalent. Tissue Eng. 2005, 11:723-733.
3. Boyer G., Laquieze L., Le Bot A., Laquieze S., Zahouani H. Dynamic indentation on human skin in vivo: ageing effects. Skin Res. Technol. 2009, 15:55-67.
4. Brown R.A. In the beginning there were soft collagen-cell gels: towards better 3D connective tissue models?. Exp. Cell Res. 2013, 319:2460-2469.
5. Cheng Y.T., Cheng C.M. Relationships between initial unloading slope, contact depth, and mechanical properties for conical indentation in linear viscoelastic solids. J. Mater. Res. 2005, 20:1046-1053.
6. Cheung H.Y., Lau K.T., Lu T.P., Hui D. A critical review on polymer-based bio-engineered materials for scaffold development. Composites Part B 2007, 38:291-300.
7. Chin L.K., Calabro A., Walker E., Derwin K.A. Mechanical properties of tyramine substituted-hyaluronan enriched fascia extracellular matrix. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2012, 100:786-793.
8. Dantzig G.B. Linear Programming and Extensions 1963, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
9. Darling E.M., Topel M., Zauscher S., Vail T.P., Guilak F. Viscoelastic properties of human mesenchymally-derived stem cells and primary osteoblasts, chondrocytes and adipocytes. J. Biomech. 2008, 41:454-464.
10. Drury J.L., Mooney D.J. Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications. Biomaterials 2003, 24:4337-4351.
11. Ebersole G.C., Anderson P.M., Powell H.M. Epidermal differentiation governs engineered skin biomechanics. J. Biomech. 2010, 43:3183-3190.
12. Echinard C. Under the epidermis, the dermis, or how to interpret skin cultures. Ann. Chir. Plast. Esth 1998, 43:197-205.
13. Elias P.Z., Spector M. Viscoelastic characterization of rat cerebral cortex and type I collagen scaffolds for central nervous system tissue engineering. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2012, 12:63-73.
14. Fallqvist B., Kroon M. A chemo-mechanical constitutive model for transiently cross-linked actin networks and a theoretical assessment of their viscoelastic behaviour. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2013, 12:373-382.
15. Flynn C., Taberner A., Nielsen P. Estimating material parameters of structurally based constitutive relation for skin mechanics. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2011, 39:1935-1946.
16. Flynn C., Taberner A.J., Nielsen P.M.F., Fels S. Simulating the three-dimensional deformation of in vivo facial skin. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2013, 28:484-494.
17. Forgacs G., Foty R.A., Shafrir Y., Steinberg M.S. Viscoelastic properties of living embryonic tissues: a quantitative study. Biophys. J. 1998, 74:2227-2234.
18. Freyman T.M., Yannas I.V., Yokoo R., Gibson L.J. Fibroblast contraction of a collagen-GAG matrix. Biomaterials 2001, 22:2883-2891.
19. Fung Y.C. Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues 1993, Springer-Verlag, New York.
20. Gardel M.L., Shin J.H., MacKintosh F.C., Mahadevan L., Matsudaira P., Weitz D.A. Elastic behavior of cross-linked and bundled actin networks. Science 2004, 304:1301-1305.
21. Geerligs M., Peters G.W.M., Ackermans P.A.J., Oomens C.W.J., Baaijens F.P.T. Linear viscoelastic behavior of subcutaneous adipose tissue. Biorheology 2008, 45:677-688.
22. Gefen A., Haberman E. Viscoelastic properties of ovine adipose tissue covering the gluteus muscles. J. Biomech. Eng. 2007, 129:924-930.
23. Gerhardt L.C., Schmidt J., Sanz-Herrera J.A., Baaijens F.P.T., Ansari T., Peters G.W.M., Oomens C.W.J. A novel method for visualising and quantifying through-plane skin layer deformations. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2012, 14:199-207.
24. Gras L.L., Mitton D., Viot P., Laporte S. Viscoelastic properties of the human sternocleidomastoideus muscle of aged women in relaxation. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2013, 27:77-83.
25. Groves R.B., Coulman S.A., Birchall J.C., Evans S.L. An anisotropic, hyperelastic model for skin: experimental measurements, finite element modelling and identification of parameters for human and murine skin. J. Mech. Behav. Mater. 2013, 18:167-180.
26. Harley B.A., Leung J.H., Silva E.C., Gibson L.J. Mechanical characterization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2007, 3:463-474.
27. Hidaka K., Moine L., Collin G., Labarre D., Grossiord J.L., Huang N., Osuga K., Wada S., Laurent A. Elasticity and viscoelasticity of embolization microspheres. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2011, 4:2161-2167.
28. Jachowicz J., McMullen R., Prettypaul D. Indentometric analysis of in vivo skin and comparison with artificial skin models. Skin Res. Technol. 2007, 13:299-309.
29. Johnson K.L. Contact Mechanics 2001, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
30. Jor J., Nash M., Nielsen P., Hunter P. Estimating material parameters of a structurally based constitutive relation for skin mechanics. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2011, 10:767-778.
31. Kanungo B.P., Gibson L.J. Density-property relationships in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2010, 6:344-353.
32. Knapp D.M., Barocas V.H., Moon A.G., Yoo K., Petzold L.R., Tranquillo R.T. Rheology of reconstituted type I collagen gel in confined compression. J. Rheol. 1997, 41:971-993.
33. Lamers E., Van Kempen T.H.S., Baaijens F.P.T., Peters G.W.M., Oomens C.W.J. Large amplitude oscillatory shear properties of human skin. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2013, 28:462-470.
34. Ledoux W.R., Blevins J.J. The compressive material properties of the plantar soft tissue. J. Biomech. 2007, 40:2975-2981.
35. Lee E.H., Radok J.R. The contact problem for viscoelastic bodies. J. Appl. Mech. 1960, 27:438-444.
36. Lee E.H. Stress analysis in viscoelastic bodies. Q. Appl. Math 1955, 13:183-190.
37. Limbert G. A mesostructurally based anisotropic continuum model for biological soft tissues decoupled invariant formulation. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed 2011, 4:1637-1657.
38. Lulevich V., Yang H.Y., Isseroff R.R., Liu G.Y. Single cell mechanics of keratinocyte cells. Ultramicroscopy 2010, 110:1435-1442.
39. Mano J.F., Silva G.A., Azevedo H.S., Malafaya P.B., Sousa R.A., Silva S.S., Boesel L.F., Oliveira J.M., Santos T.C., Marques A.P., Neves N.M., Reis R.L. Natural origin biodegradable systems in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: present status and some moving trends. J. R. Soc. Interface 2007, 4:999-1030.
40. Monteiro-Riviere N.A., Inman A.O., Snider T.H., Blank J.A., Hobson D.W. Comparison of an in vitro skin model to normal human skin for dermatological research. Microsc. Res. Tech. 1997, 37:172-179.
41. Netzlaff F., Lehr C.M., Wertz P.W., Schaefer U.F. The human epidermis models EpiSkin, SkinEthic and EpiDerm: an evaluation of morphology and their suitability for testing phototoxicity, irritancy, corrosivity, and substance transport. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2005, 60:167-178.
42. Nelder J.A., Mead R. A simplex method for function minimization. Comp. J. 1965, 7:308-313.
43. Newman S., Cloître M., Allain C., Forgacs G., Beysens D. Viscosity and elasticity during collagen assembly in vitro: relevance to matrix-driven translocation. Biopolymers 1997, 41:337-347.
44. Ni Annaidh A.N., Bruyere K., Destrade M., Gilchrist M.D., Maurini C., Ottenio M., Saccomandi G. Automated estimation of collagen fibre dispersion in the dermis and its contribution to the anisotropic behaviour of skin. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2012, 40:1666-1678.
45. Nixon F.E. Handbook of Laplace Transformation, Fundamentals, Applications, Tables, and Examples 1965, Prentice Hall, New Jersey. second ed.
46. Oyen M.L. Analytical techniques for indentation of viscoelastic materials. Philos. Mag. 2006, 86:5625-5641.
47. Pailler-Mattei C., Bec S., Zahouani H. In vivo measurements of the elastic mechanical properties of human skin by indentation tests. Med. Eng. Phys. 2008, 30:599-606.
48. Pailler-Mattei C., Nicoli S., Pirot F., Vargiolu R., Zahouani H. A new approach to describe the skin surface physical properties in vivo. Colloids Surf., B 2009, 68:200-206.
49. Pailler-Mattei C., Guerret-Piécourt C., Zahouani H., Nicoli S. Interpretation of the human skin biotribological behaviour after tape stripping. J. R. Soc. Interface 2011, 8:934-941.
50. Pailler-Mattei C., Debret R., Vargiolu R., Sommer P., Zahouani H. In vivo skin biophysical behaviour and surface topography as a function of ageing. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed 2013, 28:474-483.
51. Pan Y., Xiong D. Stress relaxation behavior of nano-hydroxyapatite reinforced poly(vinyl alcohol) gel composites as biomaterial. J. Mater. Sci. 2010, 45:5495-5501.
52. Patel P.N., Smith C.K., Patrick C.W. Rheological and recovery properties of poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate hydrogels and human adipose tissue. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2005, 73:313-319.
53. Peppas N.A., Hilt J.Z., Khademhosseini A., Langer R. Hydrogels in biology and medicine: from molecular principles to bionanotechnology. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18:1345-1360.
54. Ponec M., Boelsma E., Gibbs S., Mommaas M. Characterization of reconstructed skin models. Skin Pharmacol. Appl. 2002, 15:4-17.
55. Radok J.R. Viscoelastic stress analysis. Q. Appl. Math 1957, 15:198-202.
56. Screen H.R.C. Investigating load relaxation mechanics in tendon. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2008, 1:51-58.
57. Shahabeddin L., Berthod F., Damour O., Collombel C. Characterization of skin reconstructed on a chitosan-cross-linked collagen-glycosaminoglycan matrix. Skin Pharmacol. 1990, 3:107-114.
58. Silver F.H., Freeman J.W., DeVore D. Viscoelastic properties of human skin and processed dermis. Skin Res. Technol. 2001, 7:18-23.
59. Silver F.H., Siperko L.M., Seehra G.P. Mechanobiology of force transduction in dermal tissue. Skin Res. Technol. 2003, 9:3-23.
60. Ting T.C. The contact stresses between a rigid indenter and a viscoelastic half-space. J. Appl. Mech. 1966, 88:845-854.
61. Vaissiere G., Chevallay B., Herbage D., Damour O. Comparative analysis of different collagen-based biomaterials as scaffolds for long-term culture of human fibroblasts. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2000, 38:205-210.
62. Wang T.W., Spector M. Development of hyaluronic acid-based scaffolds for brain tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2009, 5:2371-2384.
63. Webba K., Hitchcocka R.W., Smeala R.M., Lib W., Grayb S.D., Trescoa P.A. Cyclic strain increases fibroblast proliferation, matrix accumulation, and elastic modulus of fibroblast-seeded polyurethane constructs. J. Biomech. 2006, 39:1136-1144.
64. Zahouani H., Pailler-Mattei C., Sohm B., Vargiolu R., Cenizo V., Debret R. Characterization of the mechanical properties of a dermal equivalent compared with human skin in vivo by indentation and static friction tests. Skin Res. Technol. 2009, 15:68-76.