The demise of the URM building stock in Christchurch during the 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 253-276

  Moon, Lisa ^a   Dizhur, Dmytro ^b   Senaldi, Ilaria ^c   Derakhshan, Hossein ^a   Griffith, Michael ^a   Magenes, Guido ^d   Ingham, Jason ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^c SCUOLA UNIVERSITARIA SUPERIORE IUSS PAVIA   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEMOLITION; EARTHQUAKES;

BUILDING CHARACTERISTICS; BUILDING STOCKS; DAMAGE LEVEL; EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCES; GENERAL DESCRIPTION; IMPROVEMENT TECHNIQUE; PROGRESSIVE DAMAGE; UNREINFORCED MASONRY;

CONCRETE BUILDINGS;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; DEMOLITION; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; MASONRY; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SEISMIC RETROFIT; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

CANTERBURY [SOUTH ISLAND]; CHRISTCHURCH [CANTERBURY]; NEW ZEALAND; SOUTH ISLAND;

EID: 84904623750     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/022113EQS044M     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Applied Technology Council (ATC), 1985. ATC-13: Earthquake Damage Evaluation Data for California, Redwood City, CA, 492.
2. Applied Technology Council (ATC), 1992. ATC-31: Evaluation of the Performance for Seismically retrofitted buildings, Redwood City, CA, 75.
3. Bailey, S., Dizhur, D., Trowsdale, J., Griffith, M., and Ingham, J. M., 2014. Performance of posttensioned seismic retrofit of two stone masonry buildings during the Canterbury earthquakes, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, accepted for publication.
4. Bradley, B. A., Quigley, M. C., Van Dissen, R. J., and Litchfield, N. J., 2013. Ground motion and seismic source aspects of the Canterbury earthquake sequence, Earthquake Spectra 30, 1-15.
5. Bradley, B. A., and Cubrinovski, M., 2011. Near source strong ground motions observed in the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake, Bulletin of the NZSEE 44, 181-194.
6. Bruneau, M., 1995. Performance of masonry structures during the 1994 Northridge (Los Angeles) earthquake, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 22, 379-402.
7. Cabañas, L., Benito, B., and Herráiz, M., 1997. An approach to the measurement of the potential structural damage of earthquake ground motions, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 26, 79-92.
8. Campbell, K. W., and Bozorgnia, Y., 2012a. Cumulative absolute velocity (CAV) and seismic intensity based on the PEER-NGA database, Earthquake Spectra 28, 457-485.
9. Campbell, K. W., and Bozorgnia, Y., 2012b. A comparison of ground motion prediction equations for Arias intensity and cumulative absolute velocity developed using a consistent database and functional form database, Earthquake Spectra 28, 931-941.
10. Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission, 2011. http://canterbury. royalcommission.govt.nz/.
11. Cole, G. L., Dhakal, R. P., and Turner, F. M., 2012. Building pounding damage observed in the 2011 Christchurch earthquake, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 41, 893-913.
12. Cooper, M., Carter, R., and Fenwick, R., 2012. Canterbury Earthquake Royal Commission Volume 4: Earthquake Prone Buildings, available at http://canterbury.royalcommission .govt.nz/Final-Report-Part-Two.
13. Cousins, W. J., King, A. B., and Kanga, M., 2012. Accumulated losses from sequences of earthquakes: Implications for risk modeling, in Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 24-28 September 2012, Lisbon, Portugal.
14. Dizhur, D., Ingham, J. M., Moon, L., Griffith, M., Schultz, A., Senaldi, I., Magenes, G., Dickie, J., Lissel, S., Centeno, J., Ventura, C., Leiti, J., and Lourenco, P., 2011. Performance of masonry buildings and churches in the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake, Bulletin of the NZSEE 44, 279-297.
15. Dizhur, D., Ismail, N., Knox, C., Lumantarna, R., and Ingham, J. M., 2010. Performance of unreinforced and retrofitted masonry buildings during the 2010 Darfield earthquake, Bulletin of the NZSEE 43, 321-339.
16. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), 1994. Expected Seismic Performance of Buildings, Ad Hoc Committee on Seismic Performance, Oakland, CA, 19 pp.
17. Ingham, J. M., Biggs, D. T., and Moon, L. M., 2011. How did unreinforced masonry buildings perform in the February 2011 Christchurch earthquake?, The Structural Engineer 89(6), 14-18.
18. Ingham, J. M., and Griffith, M. C., 2011a. Damage to unreinforced masonry structures by seismic activity, The Structural Engineer 89(3), 14-15.
19. Ingham, J. M., and Griffith, M. C., 2011b. Performance of unreinforced masonry buildings during the 2010 Darfield (Christchurch, NZ) earthquake, Australian Journal of Structural Engineering 11, 207-224.
20. Ingham, J. M., and Griffith, M. C., 2011c. The Performance of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings in the 2010-2011 Canterbury Earthquake Swarm, Commissioned report to the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Building Failure Caused by the Canterbury Earthquake.
21. Ingham, J. M., and Griffith, M. C., 2011d. The Performance of Earthquake Strengthened URM Buildings in the Christchurch CBD in the 22 February 2011 Earthquake, Addendum report commissioned by Royal Commission of Inquiry into Building Failure Caused by the Canterbury Earthquake.
22. Leite, J., Ingham, J. M., and Lourenco, P. B., 2013. Statistical assessment of damage to churches affected by the 2010-2011 by the Canterbury (New Zealand) earthquake sequence, Journal of Earthquake Engineering 17, 73-97.
23. Lumantarna, R., 2012. Material characterisation of New Zealand's unreinforced masonry buildings, Doctoral dissertation, The University of Auckland, Auckland, NZ, 399 pp., available at https://researchspace.auckland.ac. nz/handle/2292/18879.
24. Lumantarna, R., Biggs, D. T., and Ingham, J. M., 2014a. Uniaxial compressive strength and stiffness of field extracted and laboratory constructed masonry prisms, ASCE Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 26, 567-575, available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT .1943-5533.0000731.
25. Lumantarna, R., Biggs, D. T., and Ingham, J. M., 2014b. Compressive, flexural bond and shear bond strengths of in-situ New Zealand unreinforced clay brick masonry constructed using lime mortar between the 1880s and 1940s, ASCE Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 26, 559-566, available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000685.
26. Moon, L. M., Griffith, M. C., Ingham, J. M., and Biggs, D. T., 2012. Review of transect of Christchurch CBD following 22 February 2011 earthquake, in 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper #4686, 24-28 September, Lisbon, Portugal.
27. New Zealand Parliament, 2004. Building Act 2004, Department of Building and Housing-Te Tari Kaupapa Whare, Ministry of Economic Development, New Zealand Government, Wellington, NZ, Date of assent: 24 August 2004.
28. New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering (NZSEE), 2006. Assessment and Improvement of the Structural Performance of Buildings in Earthquakes, Recommendations of a NZSEE Study Group on Earthquake Risk Buildings.
29. Senaldi, I., Magenes, G., and Ingham, J. M., 2013. Damage assessment of unreinforced stone masonry buildings after the 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquakes, International Journal of Architectural Heritage, accepted for publication.
30. Smokehouse Restaurant, 2009. Smokehouse, available at http://www.holysmoke.co.nz (retrieved 28 October 2010).
31. Standards New Zealand, 2004. NZS 1170.5:2004, Structural Design Actions Part 5: Earthquake actions-New Zealand, Wellington, NZ.
32. Wailes, C. D., and Horner, A. C., 1933. Earthquake damage analyzed by Long Beach building officials, Engineering News-Record, 25 May 1933.