The impact of Fourier-Domain optical coherence tomography catheter induced motion artefacts on quantitative measurements of a PLLA-based bioresorbable scaffold

International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1013-1026

  Van Ditzhuijzen, N S ^a,b   Karanasos, A ^a,b   Bruining, N ^a   Van Den Heuvel, M ^a   Sorop, O ^a   Ligthart, J ^a   Witberg, K ^a   Garcia Garcia, H M ^c   Zijlstra, F ^a   Duncker, D J ^a   Van Beusekom, H M M ^a   Regar, E ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c CARDIALYSIS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bioresorbable vascular scaffold; Motion artefact; OCT; Optical coherence tomography

Indexed keywords

POLYGLACTIN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BIORESORBABLE SCAFFOLD; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY IMAGING CATHETER; EXPERIMENTAL PIG; FOLLOW UP; FOURIER DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY CATHETER; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; MALE; MEASUREMENT; NONHUMAN; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ANIMAL; BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY BLOOD VESSEL; DEVICES; DISEASE MODEL; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HEART CATHETER; HEART CATHETERIZATION; MOTION; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PIG; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; TIME;

ABSORBABLE IMPLANTS; ANIMALS; ARTIFACTS; CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; CARDIAC CATHETERS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY VESSELS; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; FOURIER ANALYSIS; MALE; MOTION; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SWINE; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE;

EID: 84904575068     PISSN: 15695794     EISSN: 15730743     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10554-014-0447-3     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP et al (1991) Optical coherence tomography. Science 254(5035):1178-1181 (Pubitemid 21917444)
2. Regar E, Schaar JA, Mont E, Virmani R, Serruys PW (2003) Optical coherence tomography. Cardiovasc Radiat Med 4(4):198-204. doi:10.1016/j.carrad. 2003.12.003 (Pubitemid 38638802)
3. Choma M, Sarunic M, Yang C, Izatt J (2003) Sensitivity advantage of swept source and Fourier domain optical coherence tomography. Opt Express 11(18):2183-2189
4. Yun SH, Tearney GJ, Vakoc BJ et al (2006) Comprehensive volumetric optical microscopy in vivo. Nat Med 12(12):1429-1433. doi:10.1038/nm1450 (Pubitemid 44924503)
5. Liu B, Brezinski ME (2007) Theoretical and practical considerations on detection performance of time domain, Fourier domain, and swept source optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Opt 12(4):044007. doi:10.1117/1.2753410
6. van Ditzhuijzen NS, van den Heuvel M, Sorop O et al (2011) Invasive coronary imaging in animal models of atherosclerosis. Neth Heart J 19(10):442-446. doi:10.1007/s12471-011-0187-0
7. Ormiston JA, Serruys PW, Regar E et al (2008) A bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting coronary stent system for patients with single de-novo coronary artery lesions (ABSORB): a prospective openlabel trial. Lancet 371(9616):899-907. doi:10.1016/S0140- 6736(08)60415-8
8. Serruys PW, Ormiston JA, Onuma Y et al (2009) A bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting coronary stent system (ABSORB): 2-year outcomes and results from multiple imaging methods. Lancet 373(9667):897-910. doi:10.1016/S0140- 6736(09)60325-1
9. Serruys PW, Onuma Y, Ormiston JA et al (2010) Evaluation of the second generation of a bioresorbable everolimus drug-eluting vascular scaffold for treatment of de novo coronary artery stenosis: six-month clinical and imaging outcomes. Circulation 122(22):2301-2312. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970772
10. Hamers R, Bruining N, Knook M, Sabate M, Roelandt JRTC (2001) A novel approach to quantitative analysis of intravascular ultrasound images. Comput Cardiol (28)589-592 (Pubitemid 34167199)
11. Brugaletta S, Radu MD, Garcia-Garcia HM et al (2012) Circumferential evaluation of the neointima by optical coherence tomography after ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation: can the scaffold cap the plaque? Atherosclerosis 221(1):106-112. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.12.008
12. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307-310 (Pubitemid 16134762)
13. Haber M, Barnhart HX (2006) Coefficients of agreement for fixed observers. Stat Methods Med Res 15(3):255-271 (Pubitemid 43833931)
14. Okamura T, Onuma Y, Garcia-Garcia HM, Bruining N, Serruys PW (2012) High-speed intracoronary optical frequency domain imaging: implications for three-dimensional reconstruction and quantitative analysis. EuroIntervention 7(10):1216-1226. doi:10.4244/EIJV7I10A194
15. Regar E (2011) Invasive imaging technologies: can we reconcile light and sound? J Cardiovasc Med 12(8):562-570
16. Arbab-Zadeh A, DeMaria AN, Penny WF, Russo RJ, Kimura BJ, Bhargava V (1999) Axial movement of the intravascular ultrasound probe during the cardiac cycle: implications for threedimensional reconstruction and measurements of coronary dimensions. Am Heart J 138(5 Pt 1):865-872 (Pubitemid 29523273)
17. Sihan K, Botha C, Post F et al (2011) Retrospective image-based gating of intracoronary optical coherence tomography: implications for quantitative analysis. EuroIntervention 6(9):1098-1103. doi:10.4244/EIJV6I9A191
18. Okamura T, Garg S, Gutierrez-Chico JL et al (2010) In vivo evaluation of stent strut distribution patterns in the bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting device: an OCT ad hoc analysis of the revision 1.0 and revision 1.1 stent design in the ABSORB clinical trial. EuroIntervention 5(8):932-938
19. Jamil Z, Tearney G, Bruining N et al (2013) Interstudy reproducibility of the second generation, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography in patients with coronary artery disease and comparison with intravascular ultrasound: a study applying automated contour detection. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29(1):39-51. doi:10.1007/s10554-012-0067-8
20. Farooq V, Gogas BD, Okamura T et al (2013) Three-dimensional optical frequency domain imaging in conventional percutaneous coronary intervention: the potential for clinical application. Eur Heart J 34(12):875-885
21. Kyono H, Guagliumi G, Sirbu V et al (2010) Optical coherence tomography (OCT) strut-level analysis of drug-eluting stents (DES) in human coronary bifurcations. EuroIntervention 6(1):69-77
22. Mehanna EA, Attizzani GF, Kyono H, Hake M, Bezerra HG (2011) Assessment of coronary stent by optical coherence tomography, methodology and definitions. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27(2):259-269
23. Farooq V, Serruys PW, Heo JH et al (2013) Intracoronary optical coherence tomography and histology of overlapping everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in a porcine coronary artery model: the potential implications for clinical practice. JACC 6(5):523-532
24. Karanasos A, Tu S, van der Linden M, van Weenen S, Ligthart J, Regar E (2012) Online 3-dimensional rendering of optical coherence tomography images for the assessment of bifurcation intervention. Can J Cardiol 28(6):759e751-759e753
25. Wang T, Wieser W, Springeling G et al (2013) Intravascular optical coherence tomography imaging at 3200 frames per second. Opt Lett 38(10):1715-1717
26. Gomez-Lara J, Brugaletta S, Diletti R et al (2011) Agreement and reproducibility of gray-scale intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography for the analysis of the bioresorbable vascular scaffold. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 79(6):890-902
27. Gonzalo N, Garcia-Garcia HM, Serruys PW et al (2009) Reproducibility of quantitative optical coherence tomography for stent analysis. EuroIntervention 5(2):224-232
28. van den Heuvel M, Sorop O, Koopmans SJ et al (2012) Coronary microvascular dysfunction in a porcine model of early atherosclerosis and diabetes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 302(1):H85-H94. doi:10.1152/ajpheart. 00311.2011
29. Schmidt EJ, Yoneyama R, Dumoulin CL et al (2009) 3D coronary motion tracking in swine models with MR tracking catheters. J Magn Reson Imaging 29(1):86-98
30. Ha J, Yoo H, Tearney GJ, Bouma BE (2012) Compensation of motion artifacts in intracoronary optical frequency domain imaging and optical coherence tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28(6):1299-1304. doi:10.1007/s10554-011- 9953-8
31. Wang A, Eggermont J, Dekker N et al (2013) Automatic stent strut detection in intravascular optical coherence tomographic pullback runs. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29(1):29-38. doi:10.1007/s10554-012-0064-y
32. Xu C, Schmitt JM, Akasaka T, Kubo T, Huang K (2011) Automatic detection of stent struts with thick neointimal growth in intravascular optical coherence tomography image sequences. Phys Med Biol 56(20):6665-6675. doi:10.1088/0031- 9155/56/20/010