Report: The process model matching contest 2013

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

Volumn 171 171 LNBIP, Issue , 2014, Pages 442-463

  Cayoglu, Ugur ^a   Dijkman, Remco ^b   Dumas, Marlon ^c   Fettke, Peter ^d,e   García Bañuelos, Luciano ^c   Hake, Philip ^d,e   Klinkmüller, Christopher ^f   Leopold, Henrik ^g   Ludwig, Andŕe ^f   Loos, Peter ^d,e   Mendling, Jan ^h   Oberweis, Andreas ^a   Schoknecht, Andreas ^a   Sheetrit, Eitam ⁱ   Thaler, Tom ^d,e   Ullrich, Meike ^a   Weber, Ingo ^j,k   Weidlich, Matthias ⁱ  

^a KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

^d GERMAN RESEARCH CENTER FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DFKI   (Germany)

^e SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^g HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^h VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Austria)

ⁱ TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^j CSIRO   (Australia)

^k UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

more..

Author keywords

Contest; Matching evaluation; Model alignment; Process matching

Indexed keywords

DATA PROCESSING;

CONTEST; EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT; EVALUATION RESULTS; MATCHING EVALUATION; MATCHING PROBLEMS; MATCHING TECHNIQUES; PROCESS MATCHING; PROCESS MODEL MATCHING;

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84904544651     PISSN: 18651348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.: Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Springer, Berlin (2012).
2. Castelo Branco, M., Troya, J., Czarnecki, K., Küster, J., Völzer, H.: Matching business process workflows across abstraction levels. In: France, R. B., Kazmeier, J., Breu, R., Atkinson, C. (eds.) MODELS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7590, pp. 626-641. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).
3. Küster, J. M., Koehler, J., Ryndina, K.: Improving business process models with reference models in business-driven development. In: Eder, J., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2006. LNCS, vol. 4103, pp. 35-44. Springer, Heidelberg (2006).
4. Weidlich, M., Mendling, J., Weske, M.: A foundational approach for managing process variability. In: Mouratidis, H., Rolland, C. (eds.) CAiSE 2011. LNCS, vol. 6741, pp. 267-282. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).
5. La Rosa, M., Dumas, M., Uba, R., Dijkman, R.: Business process model merging: An approach to business process consolidation. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 22(2), 11: 1-11: 42 (2013).
6. Dumas, M., García-Bañuelos, L., Dijkman, R. M.: Similarity search of business process models. IEEE Data Eng. Bull. 32(3), 23-28 (2009).
7. Kunze, M., Weidlich, M., Weske, M.: Behavioral similarity-a proper metric. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Toumani, F., Wolf, K. (eds.) BPM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6896, pp. 166-181. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).
8. Jin, T., Wang, J., Rosa, M. L., ter Hofstede, A. H., Wen, L.: Efficient querying of large process model repositories. Comput. Ind. 64(1), 41-49 (2013).
9. Ekanayake, C. C., Dumas, M., García-Bañuelos, L., La Rosa, M., ter Hofstede, A. H. M.: Approximate clone detection in repositories of business process models. In: Barros, A., Gal, A., Kindler, E. (eds.) BPM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7481, pp. 302-318. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).
10. Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology Matching. Springer, Heidelberg (DE) (2007).
11. Bellahsene, Z., Bonifati, A., Rahm, E. (eds.): Schema Matching and Mapping. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).
12. Wu, Z., Palmer, M.: Verbs semantics and lexical selection. In: Proceedings of the 32nd annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL '94, pp. 133-138, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics (1994).
13. Ehrig, M., Koschmider, A., Oberweis, A.: Measuring similarity between semantic business process models. In: Roddick, J. F., Hinze, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling. Australian Computer Science Communications, vol. 67, pp. 71-80 (2007).
14. Miller, G., Fellbaum, C.: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998).
15. Bunke, H.: On a relation between graph edit distance and maximum common subgraph. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 18(8), 689-694 (1997).
16. Dijkman, R. M., Dumas, M., van Dongen, B. F., Käärik, R., Mendling, J.: Similarity of business process models: metrics and evaluation. Inf. Syst. 36(2), 498-516 (2011).
17. Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., García-Bañuelos, L.: Graph matching algorithms for business process model similarity search. In: Dayal, U., Eder, J., Koehler, J., Reijers, H. A. (eds.) BPM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5701, pp. 48-63. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).
18. Weidlich, M., Dijkman, R., Mendling, J.: The ICoP framework: identification of correspondences between process models. In: Pernici, B. (ed.) CAiSE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6051, pp. 483-498. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).
19. Jain, A. K., Murty, M. N., Flynn, P. J.: Data clustering: a review. ACM Comput. Surv. 31(3), 264-323 (1999).
20. Porter, M. F.: Readings in Information Retrieval. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (1997).
21. Miller, G. A.: WordNet: a Lexical database for english. Commun. ACM 38(11), 39-41 (1995).
22. Klinkmüller, C., Weber, I., Mendling, J., Leopold, H., Ludwig, A.: Increasing recall of process model matching by improved activity label matching. In: Daniel, F., Wang, J., Weber, B. (eds.) BPM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8094, pp. 211-218. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).
23. Levenshtein, V. I.: Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Sov. Phys. Dokl. 10(8), 707-710 (1966).
24. Lin, D.: An information-theoretic definition of similarity. In. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 296-304. Morgan Kaufmann (1998).
25. Leopold, H., Smirnov, S., Mendling, J.: On the refactoring of activity labels in business process models. Inf. Syst. 37(5), 443-459 (2012).
26. Sakr, S., Awad, A., Kunze, M.: Querying process models repositories by aggregated graph search. In: La Rosa, M., Soffer, P. (eds.) BPM 2012 Workshops. LNBIP, vol. 132, pp. 573-585. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).
27. Awad, A.: BPMN-Q: A language to query business processes. In: Reichert, M., Strecker, S., Turowski, K. (eds.) EMISA. LNI, vol. P-119, pp. 115-128 St. Goar, Germany, GI (2007).
28. Weidlich, M., Sheetrit, E., Branco, M., Gal, A.: Matching business process models using positional passage-based language models. In: Ng, W., Storey, V. C., Trujillo, J. C. (eds.) ER 2013. LNCS, vol. 8217, pp. 130-137. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).
29. Lv, Y., Zhai, C.: Positional language models for information retrieval. In: Allan, J., Aslam, J. A., Sanderson, M., Zhai, C., Zobel, J. (eds.) SIGIR, pp. 299-306. ACM, New York (2009).
30. Lin, J.: Divergence measures based on the shannon entropy. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 37(1), 145-151 (1991).
31. Gal, A., Sagi, T.: Tuning the ensemble selection process of schema matchers. Inf. Syst. 35(8), 845-859 (2010).
32. Weidlich, M., Dijkman, R., Mendling, J.: The ICoP framework: identification of correspondences between process models. In: Pernici, B. (ed.) CAiSE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6051, pp. 483-498. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).
33. Qu, Y., Hu, W., Cheng, G.: Constructing virtual documents for ontology matching. In: Carr, L., Roure, D. D., Iyengar, A., Goble, C. A., Dahlin, M. (eds.) WWW, pp. 23-31. ACM, New York (2006).
34. Weidlich, M., Mendling, J., Weske, M.: Efficient consistency measurement based on behavioral profiles of process models. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 37(3), 410-429 (2011).
35. Polyvyanyy, A., Weidlich, M.: Towards a compendium of process technologies-the jbpt library for process model analysis. In: Deneckère, R., Proper, H. A. (eds.) CAiSE Forum. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 998, pp. 106-113. www. CEUR-WS. org (2013).
36. Sagi, T., Gal, A.: Schema matching prediction with applications to data source discovery and dynamic ensembling. VLDB J. 22(5), 689-710 (2013).
37. Belhajjame, K., Paton, N. W., Fernandes, A. A. A., Hedeler, C., Embury, S. M.: User feedback as a first class citizen in information integration systems. In: CIDR, pp. 175-183. www. cidrdb. org (2011).
38. Quoc Viet Nguyen, H., Wijaya, T. K., Miklós, Z., Aberer, K., Levy, E., Shafran, V., Gal, A., Weidlich, M.: Minimizing human effort in reconciling match networks. In: Ng, W., Storey, V. C., Trujillo, J. C. (eds.) ER 2013. LNCS, vol. 8217, pp. 212-226. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).
39. Sagi, T., Gal, A.: Non-binary evaluation for schema matching. In: Atzeni, P., Cheung, D., Ram, S. (eds.) ER 2012. LNCS, vol. 7532, pp. 477-486. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).
40. Duchateau, F., Bellahsene, Z., Coletta, R.: Matching and alignment: what is the cost of user post-match effort? In: Meersman, R., et al. (eds.) OTM 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7044, pp. 421-428. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).