Matching business process workflows across abstraction levels

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 7590 LNCS, Issue , 2012, Pages 626-641

  Castelo Branco, Moisés ^a   Troya, Javier ^b   Czarnecki, Krzysztof ^a   Küster, Jochen ^c   Völzer, Hagen ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

^c IBM RESEARCH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

BPMN Matching; Change Extraction; Consistency Management

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTION LEVEL; BANKING SECTORS; BPMN MATCHING; BUSINESS PROCESS; BUSINESS PROCESS MODELING; BUSINESS REQUIREMENT; CONSISTENCY MANAGEMENT; CORRESPONDENCE PATTERNS; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; HIGH PRECISION; LEVEL MODEL; MODEL ELEMENTS; PROCESS MODEL; REAL WORLD PROJECTS; WHOLE PROCESS; WORK-FLOWS;

ABSTRACTING; ALGORITHMS; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

MODELS;

EID: 84867650839     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33666-9_40     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Castelo Branco, M., Xiong, Y., Czarnecki, K., Küster, J., Völzer, H.: An Empirical Study on Consistency Management of Business and IT Process Models. Technical Report GSDLAB-TR 2012-03-22, Generative Software Development Laboratory, University of Waterloo, Waterloo (2012), http://gsd.uwaterloo.ca/reportstudybpm
2. Dijkman, R.: A Classification of Differences between Similar Business Processes. In: EDOC 2007, pp. 37-47. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2007)
3. Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., Garcia-Banuelos, L., Kaarik, R.: Aligning Business Process Models. In: EDOC 2009, pp. 45-53. IEEE (September 2009)
4. Easterbrook, S.M., Singer, J., Storey, M., Damian, D.: Selecting Empirical Methods for Software Engineering Research. In: Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering, pp. 285-311. Springer (2007)
5. Ehrig, M., Koschmider, A., Oberweis, A.: Measuring similarity between semantic business process models. In: APCCM 2007, pp. 71-80. Australian Computer Society, Inc., Darlinghurst (2007)
6. Fluri, B., Wursch, M., Pinzger, M., Gall, H.: Change Distilling: Tree Differencing for Fine-Grained Source Code Change Extraction. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 33(11), 725-743 (2007)
7. Gerth, C., Luckey, M., Küster, J.M., Engels, G.: Detection of Semantically Equivalent Fragments for Business Process Model Change Management. In: SCC 2010, pp. 57-64. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2010)
8. Gerth, C., Luckey, M., Küster, J.M., Engels, G.: Detection of Semantically Equivalent Fragments for Business Process Model Change Management. Tech. Rep. IBM Research Report RZ 3767, IBM Research, Zurich, Switzerland (2010), http://www.cs.uni-paderborn.de/uploads/tx-sibibtex/rz3767.pdf
9. Johnson, R., Pearson, D., Pingali, K.: The Program Structure Tree: Computing Control Regions in Linear Time. In: SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (1994)
10. Levenshtein, V.I.: Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady 10(8), 707-710 (1966)
11. Object Management Group: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) Version 2.0, http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/
12. Polyvyanyy, A., Vanhatalo, J., Völzer, H.: Simplified computation and generalization of the refined process structure tree. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Web Services and Formal Methods, WS-FM 2010, pp. 25-41. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
13. SOA Tools Platform: Eclipse BPMN Modeler, http://eclipse.org/projects/ project.php?id=soa.bpmnmodeler
14. Vanhatalo, J., Völzer, H., Koehler, J.: The Refined Process Structure Tree. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 100-115. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
15. Vanhatalo, J., Völzer, H., Leymann, F.: Faster and More Focused Control-Flow Analysis for Business Process Models Through SESE Decomposition. In: Krämer, B.J., Lin, K.-J., Narasimhan, P. (eds.) ICSOC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4749, pp. 43-55. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
16. Weidlich, M., Dijkman, R., Weske, M.: Deciding Behaviour Compatibility of Complex Correspondences between Process Models. In: Hull, R., Mendling, J., Tai, S. (eds.) BPM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6336, pp. 78-94. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
17. Weidlich, M., Dijkman, R.M., Mendling, J.: The ICoP Framework: Identification of Correspondences between Process Models. In: Pernici, B. (ed.) CAiSE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6051, pp. 483-498. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
18. Weidmann, M., Alvi, M., Koetter, F., Leymann, F., Renner, T., Schumm, D.: Business Process Change Management based on Process Model Synchronization of Multiple Abstraction Levels. In: Proceedings of SOCA 2011. IEEE Computer Society (2011)
19. Xing, Z., Stroulia, E.: Umldiff: an algorithm for object-oriented design differencing. In: Proceedings of the 20th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, ASE 2005, pp. 54-65. ACM, New York (2005), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1101908.1101919