Anesthetic practice for Caesarean section and factors influencing anesthesiologists' choice of anesthesia: A population-based study

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Volumn 58, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 843-850

  Lai, H Y ^a,b   Tsai, P S ^c   Fan, Y C ^d   Huang, C J ^d,e  

^a Mennonite Christian Hospital   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL DONG HWA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c TZU CHI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d TAIPEI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^e TAIPEI TZU CHI HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANESTHESIA; ANESTHESIST; ANTEPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CHI SQUARE TEST; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DECISION TREE; EMERGENCY; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; POPULATION; PREECLAMPSIA; PREMATURE LABOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK; SPINAL ANESTHESIA; TAIWAN; ANESTHESIOLOGY; BLOOD COAGULATION DISORDERS; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; DECISION MAKING; FACTUAL DATABASE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; PRE-ECLAMPSIA; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TRENDS; UTILIZATION;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA, EPIDURAL; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; ANESTHESIA, OBSTETRICAL; ANESTHESIA, SPINAL; ANESTHESIOLOGY; BLOOD COAGULATION DISORDERS; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CESAREAN SECTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DECISION TREES; EMERGENCIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PRE-ECLAMPSIA; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; SAMPLING STUDIES; TAIWAN;

EID: 84904462785     PISSN: 00015172     EISSN: 13996576     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/aas.12350     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Black C, Kaye JA, Jick H,. Cesarean delivery in the United Kingdom: time trends in the general practice research database. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 151-155. (Pubitemid 40898448)
2. MacDorman MF, Menacker F, Declercq E,. Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, and outcomes. Clin Perinatol 2008; 35: 293-307. (Pubitemid 351635812)
3. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anaesthesia. Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2007; 106: 843-863.
4. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Caesarean section. London (UK): 2012 August. (Clinical guideline no. 132). 2012.
5. Yang SN, Shen LJ, Ping T, Wang YC, Chien CW,. The delivery mode and seasonal variation are associated with the development of postpartum depression. J Affect Disord 2011; 132: 158-164.
6. Michael JA, Gordon SL,. Data mining technique: for marketing, sales and customer support. New York: Wiley, 1997.
7. Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW,. A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models. Am J Epidemiol 1982; 115: 92-106. (Pubitemid 12205725)
8. Stamer UM, Wiese R, Stüber F, Wulf H, Meuser T,. Change in anaesthetic practice for Caesarean section in Germany. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005; 49: 170-176. (Pubitemid 40313228)
9. Algert CS, Bowen JR, Giles WB, Knoblanche GE, Lain SJ, Roberts CL,. Regional block versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section and neonatal outcomes: a population-based study. BMC Med 2009; 7: 20.
10. Mancuso A, De Vivo A, Giacobbe A, Priola V, Maggio Savasta L, Guzzo M, De Vivo D, Mancuso A,. General versus spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean sections: effects on neonatal short-term outcome. A prospective randomised study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 23: 1114-1118.
11. Tsai PS, Hsu CS, Fan YC, Huang CJ,. General anaesthesia is associated with increased risk of surgical site infection after Caesarean delivery compared with neuraxial anaesthesia: a population-based study. Br J Anaesth 2011; 107: 757-761.
12. Gori F, Pasqualucci A, Corradetti F, Milli M, Peduto VA,. Maternal and neonatal outcome after cesarean section: the impact of anesthesia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2007; 20: 53-57. (Pubitemid 47215735)
13. Hawkins JL, Chang J, Palmer SK, Gibbs CP, Callaghan WM,. Anesthesia-related maternal mortality in the United States: 1979-2002. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 69-74.
14. Beckmann M, Calderbank S,. Mode of anaesthetic for category 1 caesarean sections and neonatal outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2012; 52: 316-320.
15. Sia AT, Fun WL, Tan TU,. The ongoing challenges of regional and general anaesthesia in obstetrics. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2010; 24: 303-312.
16. Popham P, Buettner A, Mendola M,. Anaesthesia for emergency caesarean section, 2000-2004, at the Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne. Anaesth Intensive Care 2007; 35: 74-79. (Pubitemid 46344289)
17. Hillemanns P, Hasbargen U, Strauss A, Schulze A, Genzel-Boroviczeny O, Hepp H,. Maternal and neonatal morbidity of emergency caesarean sections with a decision-to-delivery interval under 30 minutes: evidence from 10 years. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2003; 268: 136-141. (Pubitemid 36988444)
18. Weiner E, Bar J, Fainstein N, Ben-Haroush A, Sadan O, Golan A, Kovo M,. The effect of a program to shorten the decision-to-delivery interval for emergent cesarean section on maternal and neonatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210: 224, e1-6.
19. Thomas J, Paranjothy S, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. London: RCOG 11 Press, 2001.
20. Horowitz ER, Yogev Y, Ben-Haroush A, Kaplan B,. Women's attitude toward analgesia during labor-a comparison between 1995 and 2001. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 117: 30-32. (Pubitemid 39335858)
21. Koteles J, de Vrijer B, Penava D, Xie B,. Maternal characteristics and satisfaction associated with intrapartum epidural analgesia use in Canadian women. Int J Obstet Anesth 2012; 21: 317-323.
22. Hwa HL, Chen LK, Chen TH, Lee CN, Shyu MK, Shih JC,. Effect of availability of a parturient-elective regional labor pain relief service on the mode of delivery. J Formos Med Assoc 2006; 105: 722-730. (Pubitemid 44489742)