Regional block versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section and neonatal outcomes: A population-based study

BMC Medicine

Volumn 7, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Algert, Charles S ^a   Bowen, Jennifer R ^b   Giles, Warwick B ^b   Knoblanche, Greg E ^b   Lain, Samantha J ^a   Roberts, Christine L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b ROYAL NORTH SHORE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANESTHETIC AGENT;

ANESTHESIA COMPLICATION; APGAR SCORE; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION; CESAREAN SECTION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; FETUS DISTRESS; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTUBATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEWBORN; OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA; POPULATION RESEARCH; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; RESUSCITATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPINAL ANESTHESIA; TREATMENT INDICATION; ADULT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; METHODOLOGY; PREGNANCY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA, CONDUCTION; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; APGAR SCORE; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INTUBATION; PREGNANCY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 66049102056     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17417015     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-7-20     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia: An updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia Anesthesiology 2007, 106:843-863 10.1097/01.anes.0000264744.63275.10 17413923
2. Cyna AM Dodd J Clinical update: Obstetric anaesthesia Lancet 2007, 370:640-642 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61320-8 17720001
3. Bloom SL Spong CY Weiner SJ Landon MB Rouse DJ Varner MW Moawad AH Caritis SN Harper M Wapner RJ Sorokin Y Miodovnik M O'Sullivan MJ Sibai B Langer O Gabbe SG Complications of anesthesia for cesarean delivery Obstet Gynecol 2005, 106:281-287 16055576
4. Gordon A McKechnie EJ Jeffery H Pediatric presence at cesarean section: justified or not? Am J Obst Gynecol 2005, 193:599-605 10.1016/ j.ajog.2005.06.013
5. Afolabi BB Lesi FEA Merah NA Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006:CD004350 17054201
6. Reynolds F Seed PT Anaesthesia for Caesarean section and neonatal acid-base status: A meta-analysis Anaesthesia 2005, 60:636-653 10.1111/ j.1365-2044.2005.04223.x 15960713
7. Bucklin BA Hawkins JL Anderson JR Ullrich FA Obstetric anesthesia workforce survey: Twenty-year update Anesthesiology 2005, 103:645-653 10.1097/00000542-200509000-00030 16129992
8. NSW Department of Health Validation Study: NSW Midwives Data Collection 1998 N S W Public Health Bull 2000 http://www.publish.csiro.au/nid/227/ issue/5090.htm
9. Roberts CL For JB Lain SJ Algert CS Sparks CJ Use and accuracy of reporting of general anaesthesia for childbirth Anaesth Intensive Care 2008, 36:418-424 18564804
10. Thorngren-Jerneck K Herbst A Low 5-minute Apgar score: A population-based register study of 1 million term births Obstetrics & Gynecology 2001, 98:65-70 10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01370-9
11. Higgins JPT Thompson SG Deeks JJ Altman DG Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses Br MedJ 2003, 327:557-560 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
12. The Information Centre NHS Maternity Statistics 2005-06 http://www.ic.nhs.uk/statistics-and-data-collections/hospital-care/ maternity/nhs-maternity-statistics-england:-2006-2007
13. Bartusseck E Fatehi S Motsch J Grau T Survey on practice of regional anaesthesia in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Part 3: Methods in obstetric anaesthesia Anaesthesist 2004, 53:993-1000 10.1007/ s00101-004-0719-8 15235790
14. Parsons SJ Sonneveld S Nolan T Is a paediatrician needed at all Caesarean sections? J Paediatr Child Health 1998, 34:241-244 10.1046/ j.1440-1754.1998.00207.x 9633970
15. Atherton N Parsons SJ Mansfield P Attendance of paediatricians at elective Caesarean sections performed under regional anaesthesia: Is it warranted? J Paediatr Child Health 2006, 42:332-336 10.1111/ j.1440-1754.2006.00886.x 16737472
16. Bowring J Fraser N Vause S Heazell AEP Is regional anaesthesia better than general anaesthesia for caesarean section? J Obstet Gynaecol 2006, 26:433-434 10.1080/01443610600720345 16846870
17. Gori F Pasqualucci A Corradetti F Milli M Peduto VA Maternal and neonatal outcome after cesarean section: The impact of anesthesia J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2007, 20:53-57 10.1080/14767050601134645 17437200
18. Ong BY Cohen MM Palahniuk RJ Anesthesia for cesarean section-effects on neonates Anesth Analg 1989, 68:270-275 2919765
19. Black N Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care BMJ 1996, 312:1215-1218 2350940 8634569
20. Wallace DH Leveno KJ Cunningham FG Giesecke AH Shearer VE Sidawi JE Randomized comparison of general and regional anesthesia for cesarean delivery in pregnancies complicated by severe preeclampsia Obstetrics & Gynecology 1995, 86:193-199 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00139-I
21. Hogan L Ingemarsson I Thorngren-Jerneck K Herbst A How often is a low 5-min Apgar score in term newborns due to asphyxia? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007, 130:169-175 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.03.002 16621222
22. Roberts CL Bell JC Ford JB Hadfield RM Algert CS Morris JM The accuracy of reporting of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in population health data Hypertens Pregnancy 2008, 27:285-297 2562018 18696357 10.1080/10641950701826695