Contributing to research via biobanks: What it means to cancer patients

Health Expectations

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 523-533

  Pellegrini, Isabelle ^a   Chabannon, Christian ^a,b,c   Mancini, Julien ^a,d   Viret, Frederic ^b,c   Vey, Norbert ^a,b,c   Julian Reynier, Claire ^a,b  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIV   (France)

^b INSTITUT PAOLI CALMETTES   (France)

^c AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^d TIMONE HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Biobank; Meaning; Oncology; Qualitative study; Tumour donation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALTRUISM; BEHAVIOR; DONOR; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM; PATIENT; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALTRUISM; BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS; PATIENTS; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY); QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; TISSUE DONORS;

EID: 84904439917     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: 13697625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00781.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Khoury MJ, Millikan R, Little J, Gwinn M. The emergence of epidemiology in the genomics age. International Journal of Epidemiology, 2004 ; 33: 936 - 944 .
2. Jack AL, Womack C. Why surgical patients do not donate tissue for commercial research: review of records. BMJ, 2003 ; 327: 262 .
3. Kettis-Lindblad A, Ring L, Viberth E, Hansson MG. Genetic research and donation of tissue samples to biobanks. What do potential sample donors in the Swedish general public think?European Journal of Public Health, 2006 ; 16: 433 - 440 .
4. Start RD, Brown W, Bryant RJ et al. Ownership and uses of human tissue: does the Nuffield bioethics report accord with opinion of surgical inpatients?BMJ, 1996 ; 313: 1366 - 1368 .
5. Stegmayr B, Asplund K. Informed consent for genetic research on blood stored for more than a decade: a population based study. BMJ, 2002 ; 325: 634 - 635 .
6. Vermeulen E, Schmidt MK, Aaronson NK et al. A trial of consent procedures for future research with clinically derived biological samples. British Journal of Cancer, 2009 ; 101: 1505 - 1512 .
7. Vermeulen E, Schmidt MK, Aaronson NK et al. Opt-out plus, the patients' choice: preferences of cancer patients concerning information and consent regimen for future research with biological samples archived in the context of treatment. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2009 ; 62: 275 - 278 .
8. Pentz RD, Billot L, Wendler D. Research on stored biological samples: views of African American and White American cancer patients. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 2006 ; 140: 733 - 739 .
9. Malone T, Catalano PJ, O'Dwyer PJ, Giantonio B. High rate of consent to bank biologic samples for future research: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group experience. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2002 ; 94: 769 - 771 .
10. Hansson MG. Ethics and biobanks. British Journal of Cancer, 2009 ; 100: 8 - 12 .
11. Moutel G, de Montgolfier S, Meningaud JP, Herve C. Bio-libraries and DNA storage: assessment of patient perception of information. Medicine and Law, 2001 ; 20: 193 - 204 .
12. Petrini C. "Broad" consent, exceptions to consent and the question of using biological samples for research purposes different from the initial collection purpose. Social Science and Medicine, 2010 ; 70: 217 - 220 .
13. Ormond KE, Cirino AL, Helenowski IB, Chisholm RL, Wolf WA. Assessing the understanding of biobank participants. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 2009 ; 149A: 188 - 198 .
14. Johnsson L, Hansson MG, Eriksson S, Helgesson G. Opt-out from biobanks better respects patients' autonomy. BMJ, 2008 ; 337: a1580 .
15. Hoeyer K, Olofsson BO, Mjorndal T, Lynoe N. The ethics of research using biobanks: reason to question the importance attributed to informed consent. Archives of Internal Medicine, 2005 ; 165: 97 - 100 .
16. Wendler D, Emanuel E. The debate over research on stored biological samples: what do sources think?Archives of Internal Medicine, 2002 ; 162: 1457 - 1462 .
17. Beskow LM, Dean E. Informed consent for biorepositories: assessing prospective participants' understanding and opinions. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 2008 ; 17: 1440 - 1451 .
18. Secko DM, Preto N, Niemeyer S, Burgess MM. Informed consent in biobank research: a deliberative approach to the debate. Social Science and Medicine, 2009 ; 68: 781 - 789 .
19. Barr M. I'm not really read up on genetics': biobanks and the social context of informed consent. Biosocieties, 2006 ; 1: 251 - 262 .
20. Mancini J, Pellegrini I, Viret F et al. Consent for biobanking: assessing the understanding and views of cancer patients. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2011 ; 103: 154 - 157 .
21. Lipworth W, Morrell B, Irvine R, Kerridge I. An empirical reappraisal of public trust in biobanking research: rethinking restrictive consent requirements. Journal of Law Medicine, 2009 ; 17: 119 - 132 .
22. Axler RE, Irvine R, Lipworth W, Morrell B, Kerridge IH. Why might people donate tissue for cancer research? Insights from organ/tissue/blood donation and clinical research. Pathobiology, 2008 ; 75: 323 - 329 .
23. Kaphingst KA, Janoff JM, Harris LN, Emmons KM. Views of female breast cancer patients who donated biologic samples regarding storage and use of samples for genetic research. Clinical Genetics, 2006 ; 69: 393 - 398 .
24. Dixon-Woods M, Wilson D, Jackson CJ, Cavers D, Pritchard-Jones K. Human tissue and 'the public': the case of childhood cancer tumor banking. BioSocieties, 2008 ; 3: 57 - 80 .
25. Morrell B, Lipworth W, Axler R, Kerridge I, Little M. Cancer as rubbish: donation of tumor tissue for research. Qualitative Health Research, 2011 ; 21: 75 - 84 .
26. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1967 .
27. Charmaz K. Grounded theory. In: Smith J, Hami R, Van Langenhove L ( eds ) Rethinking Methods in Psychology. London: Sage, 1995: 27 - 49 .
28. Pope C, Mays N. Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ, 1995 ; 311: 42 - 45 .
29. Turnquist DC, Harvey JH, Andersen BL. Attributions and adjustment to life-threatening illness. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1988 ; 27 ( Pt 1 ): 55 - 65 .
30. Luker KA, Beaver K, Leinster SJ, Owens RG. Meaning of illness for women with breast cancer. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 1996 ; 23: 1194 - 1201 .
31. Cox K. Enhancing cancer clinical trial management: recommendations from a qualitative study of trial participants' experiences. Psychooncology, 2000 ; 9: 314 - 322 .
32. Milbank J. The gift and the given. Theory, Culture & Society, 2006 ; 23: 444 - 447 .
33. Zaller N, Nelson KE, Ness P, Wen G, Bai X, Shan H. Knowledge, attitude and practice survey regarding blood donation in a Northwestern Chinese city. Transfusion Medicine (Oxford, England), 2005 ; 15: 277 - 286 .
34. Cox K, Avis M. Psychosocial aspects of participation in early anticancer drug trials. Report of a pilot study. Cancer Nursing, 1996 ; 19: 177 - 186 .
35. Morris N, Balmer B. Volunteer human subjects' understandings of their participation in a biomedical research experiment. Social Science and Medicine, 2006 ; 62: 998 - 1008 .
36. Rothstein MA. Expanding the ethical analysis of biobanks. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 2005 ; 33: 89 - 101 .
37. Mauss M. Essai sur le don, forme et raison de l'échange dans les sociétés archaïques. L'année Sociologique, 1924 ; 1: 30 - 186 .
38. Felt U, Bister MD, Strassnig M, Wagner U. Refusing the information paradigm: informed consent, medical research, and patient participation. Health (London), 2009 ; 13: 87 - 106 .
39. Titmuss RM. The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy. London: LSE Books, 1971 .
40. Gandour-Edwards R, Nguyen H, Castillo M, Soares S. Patient consent: a major obstacle in tissue banking? Perspectives from the UC Davis Cancer Center. Cell Preservation Technology, 2007 ; 5: 151 - 154 .
41. Wright JR, Whelan TJ, Schiff S et al. Why cancer patients enter randomized clinical trials: exploring the factors that influence their decision. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2004 ; 22: 4312 - 4318 .
42. Baumann DJ, Cialdini RB, Kendrick DT. Altruism as hedonism: helping and self-gratification as equivalent responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981 ; 40: 1039 - 1046 .
43. Ferguson E, Farrell K, Lawrence C. Blood donation is an act of benevolence rather than altruism. Health Psychology, 2008 ; 27: 327 - 336 .
44. Dixon-Woods M, Ashcroft RE, Jackson CJ et al. Beyond "misunderstanding": written information and decisions about taking part in a genetic epidemiology study. Social Science and Medicine, 2007 ; 65: 2212 - 2222 .