Tests for quantum contextuality in terms of q-entropies

Quantum Information and Computation

Volumn 14, Issue 11-12, 2014, Pages 996-1013

  Rastegin, Alexey E ^a  

^a IRKUTSK STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Bell theorem; Chain rule; Conditional q entropy; Contextuality hypothesis; Marginal scenario

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION THEORY; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

BELL'S THEOREM; CHAIN RULES; CONDITIONAL Q-ENTROPY; CONTEXTUALITY; CONTEXTUALITY HYPOTHESIS; ENTROPIC MEASURES; INFORMATION-THEORETIC APPROACH; JOINT PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; MARGINAL SCENARIO; Q-ENTROPIES;

BELLS;

EID: 84904416061     PISSN: 15337146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.26421/qic14.11-12-7     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang (2000), Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge University Press (Cambridge).
2. E. Schrödinger (1935), Die gegenwärtige situation in der quantenmechanik, Naturwissenschaften 23, 807-812, 823-828, 844-849; the translation is reprinted in J. A. Wheeler, W. H. Zurek, eds. (1983), Quantum Theory and Measurement, 152-167, Princeton University Press (Princeton).
3. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen (1935), Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777-780; reprinted in J. A. Wheeler, W. H. Zurek, eds. (1983), Quantum Theory and Measurement, 138-141, Princeton University Press (Princeton).
4. D. Bohm (1951), Quantum Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (New Jersey).
5. M. J. W. Hall (2010), Local deterministic model of singlet state correlations based on relaxing measurement independence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 250404.
6. J. Barrett and N. Gisin (2011), How much measurement independence is needed to demonstrate nonlocality?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 100406.
7. J. S. Bell (1964), On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox, Physics 1, 195-200.
8. A. Zeilinger (1999), Experiment and the foundations of quantum physics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, S288-S297.
9. A. Acín, N. Gisin, L. Masanes, and V. Scarani (2004), Bell's inequalities detect efficient entanglement, Int. J. Quant. Inf. 2, 23-32.
10. A. Acín, N. Gisin, and V. Scarani (2003), Security bounds in quantum cryptography using d-level systems, Quantum Information & Computation 3, 563-580.
11. S. Pironio, A. Acín, S. Massar, A. Boyer de la Giroday, D. N. Matsukevich, P. Maunz, S. Olmschenk, D. Hayes, L. Luo, T. A. Manning, and C. Monroe (2010), Random numbers certified by Bell's theorem, Nature 464, 1021-1024.
12. A. J. Leggett and A. Garg (1985), Quantum mechanics versus macroscopic realism: Is the flux there when nobody looks? Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 857-860.
13. C. Emary, N. Lambert, and F. Nori (2013), Leggett-Garg inequalities, arXiv: 1304. 5133 [quantph].
14. A. R. Usha Devi, H. S. Karthik, Sudha, and A. K. Rajagopal (2013), Macrorealism from entropic Leggett-Garg inequalities, Phys. Rev. A 87, 052103.
15. J. S. Bell (1966), On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 447-452.
16. S. Kochen and E. P. Specker (1967), The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics, J. Math. Mech. 17, 59-87.
17. N. D. Mermin (1993), Hidden variables and the two theorems of John Bell, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 803-815.
18. O. Oreshkov, F. Costa, and Č. Brukner (2012), Quantum correlations with no causal order, Nature Communications 3, 1092. DOI: 10. 1038/ncomms2076
19. D. M. Greenberger, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and A. Zeilinger (1990), Bell's theorem without inequalities, Am. J. Phys. 58, 1131-1143.
20. A. Acín, G. Vidal, and J. I. Cirac (2003), On the structure of a reversible entanglement generating set for three-partite states, Quantum Information & Computation 3, 55-63.
21. A. Salles, D. Cavalcanti, A. Acín, D. Pérez-García, and M. M. Wolf (2010), Bell inequalities from multilinear contractions, Quantum Information & Computation 10, 0703-0719.
22. S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves (1988), Information-theoretic Bell inequalities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 662-665.
23. N. J. Cerf and C. Adami (1997), Entropic Bell inequalities, Phys. Rev. A 55, 3371-3374.
24. R. Renner (2005), Security of quantum key distribution. PhD thesis, arXiv: quant-ph/0512258.
25. J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt (1969), Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880-884.
26. A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger (1982), Experimental realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm gedankenexperiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91-94.
27. A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger (1982), Experimental tests of Bell's inequalities using time-varying analyzers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804-1807.
28. A. A. Klyachko, M. A. Can, S. Binicioǧlu, and A. S. Shumovsky (2008), Simple test for hidden variables in spin-1 systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 020403.
29. R. Chaves and T. Fritz (2012), Entropic approach to local realism and noncontextuality, Phys. Rev. A 85, 032113.
30. P. Kurzyński, R. Ramanathan, and D. Kaszlikowski (2012), Entropic test of quantum contex tuality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 020404.
31. Y.-C. Liang, R. W. Spekkens, and H. M. Wiseman (2011), Specker's parable of the overprotective seer: A road to contextuality, nonlocality and complementarity, Phys. Rep. 506, 1-39.
32. M. Araújo, M. T. Quintino, C. Budroni, M. T. Cunha, and A. Cabello (2013), All noncontextuality inequalities for the n-cycle scenario, Phys. Rev. A 88, 022118
33. G. Borges, M. Carvalho, P.-L. de Assis, J. Ferraz, M. Araújo, A. Cabello, M. T. Cunha, and S. Pádua (2013), Experimental test of the quantum violation of the noncontextuality inequalities for the n-cycle scenario, arXiv: 1304. 4512 [quant-ph].
34. R. Chaves and T. Fritz (2013), Entropic inequalities and marginal problems, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 59, 803-817.
35. A. Rényi (1961), On measures of entropy and information, Proc. 4th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 547-561, University of California Press: Berkeley-Los Angeles.
36. C. Tsallis (1988), Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics, J. Stat. Phys. 52, 479-487.
37. J. Havrda and F. Charvát (1967), Quantification methods of classification processes: concept of structural entropy, Kybernetika 3, 30-35.
38. G. A. Raggio (1995), Properties of q-entropies, J. Math. Phys. 36, 4785-4791.
39. I. Bengtsson and K. Życzkowski (2006), Geometry of Quantum States: An Introduction to Quantum Entanglement, Cambridge University Press (Cambridge).
40. T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas (1991), Elements of Information Theory, John Wiley & Sons (New York).
41. S. Furuichi (2006), Information-theoretical properties of Tsallis entropies, J. Math. Phys. 47, 023302.
42. A. E. Rastegin (2012), Convexity inequalities for estimating generalized conditional entropies from below, Kybernetika 48, 242-253.
43. A. E. Rastegin (2013), Bounds of the Pinsker and Fannes types on the Tsallis relative entropy, Math. Phys. Anal. Geom. 16, 213-228.
44. I. Vajda (1968), Bounds of the minimal error probability on checking a finite or countable number of hypotheses, Problemy Peredači Informacii 4, 9-19 (in Russian); translated as Problems of Information Transmission 4, 6-14.
45. T. Yamano (2001), Information theory based on nonadditive information content, Phys. Rev. E 63, 046105.
46. B. S. Tsirel'son (1980), Quantum generalizations of Bell's inequality, Lett. Math. Phys. 4, 93-100.
47. E. Wakakuwa and M. Murao (2012), The chain rule implies Tsirelson's bound: an approach from generalized mutual information, New J. Phys. 14, 113037.
48. S. Abramsky and A. Brandenburger (2011), The sheaf-theoretic structure of non-locality and contextuality, New J. Phys. 13, 113036.
49. R. Chaves (2013), Entropic inequalities as a necessary and sufficient condition to noncontextuality and locality, Phys. Rev. A 87, 022102.
50. L. Masanes, A. Acín, and N. Gisin (2006), General properties of nonsignaling theories, Phys. Rev. A 73, 012112.